scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Food allergy QoL questionnaire for children aged 0-12 years : content, construct, and cross-cultural validity

TLDR
A food allergy‐specific questionnaire that allows parents to report children's health‐related QoL (HRQL) from the child's perspective from the children's perspective is proposed.
Abstract
Summary Background To date, there is no food allergy-specific questionnaire that allows parents to report children's health-related QoL (HRQL) from the child's perspective. Objective The aim of this study was to develop a sensitive, multi-dimensional measure to assess parental perception of HRQL in children aged 0–12 years with food allergy. Methods The Food Allergy QoL – Parent Form (FAQLQ-PF) was developed and validated in four stages: (1) item generation using focus groups, expert opinion, and literature review; (2) item reduction, using clinical impact and factor analysis; (3) internal and test–retest reliability and construct validity were evaluated using relevant scales of the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)-28 and the disease-specific food allergy independent measure (FAIM); and (4) cross-cultural and content validity was examined by administering the questionnaire in a US sample. Results Stage 1: Saturation was reached at 110 items. Stage 2: The reduced instrument has 14 items for children <4 years and 26 and 30 items for children aged 4–6 years and 7–12 years, respectively. Factor analysis revealed three subscales: emotional impact, food anxiety, and social and dietary limitations, accounting for 68% of the variance. Stage 3: Cronbach's α >0.7 for subscales and total score. Construct validity was demonstrated by significant correlations between relevant scales of the CHQ-28 and FAQLQ-PF subscales (r=0.69–0.77, P<0.01), and between FAQLQ-PF subscales and the FAIM. Sensitivity was shown by significant within-group differences in a sample of 124 food-allergic children. Stage 4: The FAQLQ-PF was validated in a sample of US children, Cronbach's α >0.7 for subscales and total score. Construct validity was demonstrated by significant correlations between FAQLQ-PF and the FAIM (parent report) and between the FAQLQ-PF and the FAIM (child report). No differences were observed between the US and Irish scores. Conclusion The FAQLQ-PF is psychometrically robust, with excellent reliability and validity.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The psychosocial impact of food allergy and food hypersensitivity in children, adolescents and their families: a review.

TL;DR: The psychosocial impact of food allergy and food hypersensitivity in children, adolescents and their families: a review is a review.
Journal ArticleDOI

Health-related quality of life of food allergic patients: Comparison with the general population and other diseases

TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared generic health-related quality of life (HRQL) of food allergic patients from childhood to adulthood with that of the general population or patients with other chronic diseases.
Journal ArticleDOI

Development and validation of the self-administered Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire for adolescents

TL;DR: The FAQLQ-TF is the first self-administered, disease-specific HRQL questionnaire for adolescents with food allergy and has good construct validity and excellent internal consistency and discriminates between adolescents who differ in the number of food allergies.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.

TL;DR: In this paper, a general formula (α) of which a special case is the Kuder-Richardson coefficient of equivalence is shown to be the mean of all split-half coefficients resulting from different splittings of a test, therefore an estimate of the correlation between two random samples of items from a universe of items like those in the test.
Book

Scale development : theory and applications

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the role of measurement in the social sciences and propose guidelines for scale development in the context of scale-based measurement. But, the authors do not discuss the relationship between scale scores and scale length.
Book

An easy guide to factor analysis

Paul Kline
TL;DR: The use and Abuse of Factor Analysis in Research References Index is illustrated with examples from Personality Tests and a comparison of the use and abuse of factor analysis in the context of clinical trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring health-related quality of life.

TL;DR: Patients, clinicians, and health care administrators are all keenly interested in the effects of medical interventions on HRQL, because increasing efforts exist to incorporate HRQLs as measures of the quality of care and of clinical effectiveness, and because payers are beginning to use HRQL information in reimbursement decisions.
Book

Quality of Life: Assessment, Analysis, and Interpretation

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors developed and tested a questionnaire for clinical trials and found that the questionnaire scores and measures were validated, reliability, and sensitivity, respectively, in terms of Validity, Reliability, Sensitivity.
Related Papers (5)