scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook

Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Milanovic et al. as discussed by the authors presented a new account of the dynamics that drive inequality on a global scale, drawing on vast data sets and cutting-edge research, and explained the benign and malign forces that make inequality rise and fall within and among nations.
Abstract
One of the world s leading economists of inequality, Branko Milanovic presents a bold new account of the dynamics that drive inequality on a global scale. Drawing on vast data sets and cutting-edge research, he explains the benign and malign forces that make inequality rise and fall within and among nations. He also reveals who has been helped the most by globalization, who has been held back, and what policies might tilt the balance toward economic justice."Global Inequality" takes us back hundreds of years, and as far around the world as data allow, to show that inequality moves in cycles, fueled by war and disease, technological disruption, access to education, and redistribution. The recent surge of inequality in the West has been driven by the revolution in technology, just as the Industrial Revolution drove inequality 150 years ago. But even as inequality has soared "within" nations, it has fallen dramatically "among" nations, as middle-class incomes in China and India have drawn closer to the stagnating incomes of the middle classes in the developed world. A more open migration policy would reduce global inequality even further.Both American and Chinese inequality seems well entrenched and self-reproducing, though it is difficult to predict if current trends will be derailed by emerging plutocracy, populism, or war. For those who want to understand how we got where we are, where we may be heading, and what policies might help reverse that course, Milanovic s compelling explanation is the ideal place to start."

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Book Review: OECD, Growing Unequal? Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries:

TL;DR: In this paper, a redistribuição governamental através do sistema de benefícios fiscais afecta estas tendências.
Journal ArticleDOI

Global Burden of Disease and the Impact of Mental and Addictive Disorders.

TL;DR: The newest empirical evidence regarding the burden of mental and addictive disorders is reviewed and their importance for global health in the first decades of the twenty-first century is weighed.
References
More filters
Book

The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism

TL;DR: In this paper, Esping-Andersen distinguishes three major types of welfare state, connecting these with variations in the historical development of different Western countries, and argues that current economic processes such as those moving toward a post-industrial order are shaped not by autonomous market forces but by the nature of states and state differences.
Journal ArticleDOI

Income Inequality in the United States, 1913–1998

TL;DR: The authors showed that the large shocks that capital owners experienced during the Great Depression and World War II have had a permanent effect on top capital incomes and argued that steep progressive income and estate taxation may have prevented large fortunes from fully recovering from these shocks.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Global Decline of the Labor Share

TL;DR: The authors showed that the global labor share has signicantly declined since the early 1980s, with the decline occurring within the large majority of countries and industries, and that the decrease in the relative price of investment goods, often attributed to advances in information technology and the computer age, induced rms.
Book

Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age

TL;DR: The first edition of Unequal Democracy was an instant classic, shattering illusions about American democracy and spurring scholarly and popular interest in the political causes and consequences of escalating economic inequality.
Journal ArticleDOI

Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens

Abstract: Each of four theoretical traditions in the study of American politics—which can be characterized as theories of Majoritarian Electoral Democracy, Economic-Elite Domination, and two types of interest-group pluralism, Majoritarian Pluralism and Biased Pluralism—offers different predictions about which sets of actors have how much influence over public policy: average citizens; economic elites; and organized interest groups, mass-based or business-oriented. A great deal of empirical research speaks to the policy influence of one or another set of actors, but until recently it has not been possible to test these contrasting theoretical predictions against each other within a single statistical model. We report on an effort to do so, using a unique data set that includes measures of the key variables for 1,779 policy issues. Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence. The results provide substantial support for theories of Economic-Elite Domination and for theories of Biased Pluralism, but not for theories of Majoritarian Electoral Democracy or Majoritarian Pluralism.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
What are some possible solutions to global inequality?

The paper does not provide specific solutions to global inequality. It discusses the factors that drive inequality and suggests that a more open migration policy could reduce global inequality further.