scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Healthcare information systems: data mining methods in the creation of a clinical recommender system

TLDR
The proposed system uses correlations among nursing diagnoses, outcomes and interventions to create a recommender system for constructing nursing care plans, and utilises a prefix-tree structure common in itemset mining to construct a ranked list of suggested care plan items based on previously-entered items.
Abstract
Recommender systems have been extensively studied to present items, such as movies, music and books that are likely of interest to the user. Researchers have indicated that integrated medical information systems are becoming an essential part of the modern healthcare systems. Such systems have evolved to an integrated enterprise-wide system. In particular, such systems are considered as a type of enterprise information systems or ERP system addressing healthcare industry sector needs. As part of efforts, nursing care plan recommender systems can provide clinical decision support, nursing education, clinical quality control, and serve as a complement to existing practice guidelines. We propose to use correlations among nursing diagnoses, outcomes and interventions to create a recommender system for constructing nursing care plans. In the current study, we used nursing diagnosis data to develop the methodology. Our system utilises a prefix-tree structure common in itemset mining to construct a ranked list of suggested care plan items based on previously-entered items. Unlike common commercial systems, our system makes sequential recommendations based on user interaction, modifying a ranked list of suggested items at each step in care plan construction. We rank items based on traditional association-rule measures such as support and confidence, as well as a novel measure that anticipates which selections might improve the quality of future rankings. Since the multi-step nature of our recommendations presents problems for traditional evaluation measures, we also present a new evaluation method based on average ranking position and use it to test the effectiveness of different recommendation strategies.

read more

Citations
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Big Data Applications in Health Care and Education

TL;DR: In this article, the authors make a critical analysis of these aspects of higher education and healthcare with respect to big data analysis and make some recommendations in this direction, which can collectively help the healthcare industry to find out problems related to variability in healthcare quality and escalating healthcare expenditure.
Posted ContentDOI

Mindcraft: A Mobile Mental Health Monitoring Platform for Children and Young People (Preprint)

TL;DR: Mindcraft as mentioned in this paper is a mobile mental health monitoring platform which has been developed in response to the negative mental health trends among children and young people, focusing on user experience and careful collection of meaningful mental health-related self-reported data and passive mobile sensor data following Good Clinical Practice standards of data security and privacy.
References
More filters
Book

Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques

TL;DR: This book presents dozens of algorithms and implementation examples, all in pseudo-code and suitable for use in real-world, large-scale data mining projects, and provides a comprehensive, practical look at the concepts and techniques you need to get the most out of real business data.
BookDOI

To Err Is Human Building a Safer Health System

TL;DR: Boken presenterer en helhetlig strategi for hvordan myndigheter, helsepersonell, industri og forbrukere kan redusere medisinske feil.
Journal ArticleDOI

Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions

TL;DR: This paper presents an overview of the field of recommender systems and describes the current generation of recommendation methods that are usually classified into the following three main categories: content-based, collaborative, and hybrid recommendation approaches.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems

TL;DR: The key decisions in evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems are reviewed: the user tasks being evaluated, the types of analysis and datasets being used, the ways in which prediction quality is measured, the evaluation of prediction attributes other than quality, and the user-based evaluation of the system as a whole.
Related Papers (5)