scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Intravaginal misoprostol versus transcervical Foley catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This report outlines the three cervical factors -- length consistency and dilatation -- responsible for the comparative advantage of intravaginal misoprostol above the transcervical Foley catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening.
About
This article is published in International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics.The article was published on 2006-02-01. It has received 16 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Foley catheter & Misoprostol.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Mechanical methods for induction of labour

TL;DR: Mechanical methods reduced the risk of hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes when compared with vaginal prostaglandins: vaginal PGE2 (eight studies; 1203 women, RR 0.16; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64 to 1.26) and misoprostol (3% versus 9%).
Journal ArticleDOI

Which method is best for the induction of labour? A systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis

TL;DR: Overall, misoprostol and oxytocin with amniotomy (for women with favourable cervix) is more successful than other agents in achieving VD within 24 hours and several treatments reduced the odds of caesarean section, but there was considerable uncertainty in treatment rankings.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol with Foley Catheter for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor

TL;DR: In the cases of pregnancy termination and unripe cervix, two methods of misoprostol and Foley catheter were considered suitable, but it seemed that misop frostol decreases the delivery time and was needed for the cesarean section.
Journal ArticleDOI

Combined Foley's catheter with vaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening: A randomised controlled trial.

TL;DR: Pre‐induction cervical ripening greatly influences the outcome of induction of labour (IOL) and the decision to induce labour is driven by the mother and the baby.
Journal ArticleDOI

Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis.

TL;DR: Labor induction with a combination of intracervical Foley catheter and intravaginal misoprostol may be a better choice based on advantages in shortening induction time and reducing the risk of uterine tachysystole and meconium staining compared to intravagsinal misOProstol alone.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Labor induction with misoprostol.

TL;DR: Overall, most trials fail to demonstrate a significant change in the cesarean delivery rate with the use of this agent, but misoprostol is an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction when used in a judicious and cautious fashion.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Randomized Comparison of Transcervical Foley Catheter to Intravaginal Misoprostol for Preinduction Cervical Ripening

TL;DR: Intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical Foley catheter are equivalent for cervical ripening and Uterine contractile abnormalities and meconium passage are more common with misop frostol.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.

TL;DR: Intravaginal Misoprostol is as effective a pre-induction cervical ripening agent as transcervical Foley catheters, with added advantages of shorter duration of cervical ripens, reduced oxytocin requirement for induction of labour and greater acceptability to patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Use of Misoprostol for Induction of Labour in a Low-Resource Setting

TL;DR: It is confirmed that misoprostol can be used safely for induction of labour in settings where there are no items of sophisticated monitoring equipment.
Related Papers (5)