scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Involving South Asian patients in clinical trials.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
How South Asian patients conceptualise the notion of clinical trials is investigated and key processes that impact on trial participation are identified and the extent to which communication difficulties, perceptions of risk and attitudes to authority influence these decisions is identified.
Abstract
Objectives To investigate how South Asian patients conceptualise the notion of clinical trials and to identify key processes that impact on trial participation and the extent to which communication difficulties, perceptions of risk and attitudes to authority influence these decisions. Also to identify whether 'South Asian' patients are homogeneous in these issues, and which factors differ between different South Asian subgroups and finally how professionals regard the involvement of South Asian patients and their views on strategies to increase participation. Data sources A review of the literature on minority ethnic participation in clinical trials was followed by three qualitative interview studies. Interviews were taped and transcribed (and translated if required) and subjected to framework analysis. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 25 health professionals; 60 South Asian lay people who had not taken part in a trial and 15 South Asian trial participants. Results Motivations for trial participation were identified as follows: to help society, to improve own health or that of family and friends, out of obligation to the doctor and to increase scientific knowledge. Deterrents were concerns about drug side-effects, busy lifestyles, language, previous bad experiences, mistrust and feelings of not belonging to British society. There was no evidence of antipathy amongst South Asians to the concept of clinical trials and, overall, the younger respondents were more knowledgeable than the older ones. Problems are more likely to be associated with service delivery. Lack of being approached was a common response. Lay-reported factors that might affect South Asian participation in clinical trials include age, language, social class, feeling of not belonging/mistrust, culture and religion. Awareness of clinical trials varied between each group. There are more similarities than differences in attitudes towards clinical trial participation between the South Asian and the general population. Important decisions, such as participation in clinical trials, are likely to be made by those family members who are fluent in English and younger. Social class appears to be more important than ethnicity, and older South Asian people and those from working class backgrounds appear to be more mistrustful. Approachable patients (of the same gender, social class and fluent in English) tend to be 'cherry picked' to clinical trials. This practice was justified because of a lack of time and resources and inadequate support. South Asian patients might be systematically excluded from trials owing to the increased cost and time associated with their inclusion, particularly in relation to the language barrier. Under-representation might also be due to passive exclusion associated with cultural stereotypes. Other characteristics such as gender, age, educational level and social class can also affect trial inclusion. Conclusions Effective strategies for South Asian recruitment to clinical trials include: using multi-recruitment strategies; defining the demographic and social profiles of the population to be included; using focus groups to identify any potential barriers; consulting representative community members to provide assistance in the study; ensuring eligibility criteria are set as wide as possible; developing educational and recruitment approaches to attract ethnic minority health professionals; ensuring health professionals are adequately trained in culturally and ethnically orientated service provision; determining the most effective mass media to use in study promotion and recruitment; and targeting inner-city, single-handed practices likely to have high ethnic minority populations. Future research should consider: responses when invited to participate; the role of methodological and organisational barriers to recruitment; the complexities of recruitment from a health professional perspective; developing culturally sensitive research methods; the magnitude of the problem of under-recruitment; strategies to encourage inner-city, single-handed GP participation; and other factors affecting trial inclusion, such as age, gender, educational level and socio-cultural background.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Patient engagement in research: a systematic review

TL;DR: Patient engagement in healthcare research is likely feasible in many settings but can become tokenistic and research dedicated to identifying the best methods to achieve engagement is lacking and clearly needed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reaching the hard-to-reach: a systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups

TL;DR: A comprehensive summation of the major barriers to working with various disadvantaged groups is provided, along with proposed strategies for addressing each of the identified types of barriers.
Journal ArticleDOI

Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework

TL;DR: There is growing attention towards increasing patient and service user engagement in biomedical and health services research, but existing variations in language and design inhibit reporting and indexing, which are crucial to comparative effectiveness in determining best practices.
Journal ArticleDOI

Call to action: cardiovascular disease in Asian Americans: a science advisory from the American Heart Association.

TL;DR: The purpose of this Advisory is to highlight the gaps in existing research on cardiovascular disease (CVD) among Asian Americans, and to serve as a call to action on behalf of the American Heart Association to address these areas of need.
Journal ArticleDOI

A systematic review of tools used to assess the quality of observational studies that examine incidence or prevalence and risk factors for diseases

TL;DR: A literature search of several databases to abstract format, content, development, and validation of checklists and scales used to evaluate observational studies that examine incidence or prevalence and risk factors for diseases was conducted by as discussed by the authors.
References
More filters
Book

Designing Qualitative Research

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present an approach for recording, managing, and analyzing data in the context of qualitative research, defending the value and logic of research, and managing time and resources.
Book

Principles of biomedical ethics

TL;DR: The principles of biomedical and Islamic medical ethics and an interfaith perspective on end-of-life issues and three cases to exemplify some of the conflicts in ethical decision-making are discussed.
Book

Ethnography: Principles and Practice

TL;DR: Features include the selection and sampling of cases, the problems of access, observation and interviewing, recording and filing data, and the process of data analysis.
Book

Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data

TL;DR: This book discusses the design and implementation of the Responsive Interviewing Model, and some of the techniques used, as well as personal reflections on Responsive interviewing.
Journal ArticleDOI

The psychology of attitudes.

TL;DR: The only truly comprehensive advanced level textbook designed for courses in the pscyhology of attitudes and related studies in attitude measurement, social cognition is as mentioned in this paper, which contains a comprehensive coverage of classic and modern research and theory.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
WHO Issues clinical trial certificate in Singapore?

There are more similarities than differences in attitudes towards clinical trial participation between the South Asian and the general population.