scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Managing carbon aspirations: the influence of corporate climate change targets on environmental performance

TLDR
This article explored the role of firms' climate change targets in shaping their emissions trends in the context of a large multi-country sample of companies and found that targets characterized by a commitment to more ambitious emissions reductions, a longer target time frame, and absolute reductions in emissions are associated with significant reductions in firms' emissions.
Abstract
Addressing climate change is among the most challenging ethical issues facing contemporary business and society. Unsustainable business activities are causing significant distributional and procedural injustices in areas such as public health and vulnerability to extreme weather events, primarily because of a distinction between primary emitters and those already experiencing the impacts of climate change. Business, as a significant contributor to climate change and beneficiary of externalizing environmental costs, has an obligation to address its environmental impacts. In this paper, we explore the role of firms’ climate change targets in shaping their emissions trends in the context of a large multi-country sample of companies. We contrast two intentions for setting emissions reductions targets: symbolic attempts to manage external stakeholder perceptions via “greenwashing” and substantive commitments to reducing environmental impacts. We argue that the attributes of firms’ climate change targets (their extent, form, and time horizon) are diagnostic of firms’ underlying intentions. Consistent with our hypotheses, while we find no overall effect of setting climate change targets on emissions, we show that targets characterized by a commitment to more ambitious emissions reductions, a longer target time frame, and absolute reductions in emissions are associated with significant reductions in firms’ emissions. Our evidence suggests the need for vigilance among policy-makers and environmental campaigners regarding the underlying intentions that accompany environmental management practices and shows that these can to some extent be diagnosed analytically.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A systematic review on green human resource management: Implications for social sustainability

TL;DR: In this paper, a systematic review of the domain specific literature was carried out using the Scopus and Google Scholar databases which resulted in a set of 174 scientific articles between 1995 and 2019.
Journal ArticleDOI

Does China's carbon emissions trading policy improve the technology innovation of relevant enterprises?

TL;DR: Wang et al. as discussed by the authors employed the difference in difference difference (DID) and DID-based propensity score matching models to evaluate the effect of China's carbon emissions trading (CET) on technology innovation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Corporate governance, law, culture, environmental performance and CSR disclosure: A global perspective

TL;DR: In this paper, the impact of corporate governance and culture background on firms' environmental performance and CSR disclosure from a global perspective was investigated, and the authors found that common internal corporate governance best practices (such as CEO non-duality, ESG committees and gender diversified boards) are associated with better environmental performance, supporting the voluntary disclosure theory.
Journal ArticleDOI

How do we measure corporate environmental performance? A critical review

TL;DR: A new conceptualization of CEP is proposed based on a comprehensive and critical review of three decades of dedicated research, which highlights the pivotal concept of environmental impact and the corporate goal of reducing and preventing environmental harm.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error

James J. Heckman
- 01 Jan 1979 - 
TL;DR: In this article, the bias that results from using non-randomly selected samples to estimate behavioral relationships as an ordinary specification error or "omitted variables" bias is discussed, and the asymptotic distribution of the estimator is derived.
Journal ArticleDOI

Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that the trade-off between environmental regulation and competitiveness unnecessarily raises costs and slows down environmental progress, and that instead of simply adding to cost, properly crafted environmental standards can trigger innovation offsets, allowing companies to improve their resource productivity.
Journal ArticleDOI

A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the effect of the variance inflation factor (VIF) on the results of regression analyses, and found that threshold values of the VIF need to be evaluated in the context of several other factors that influence the variance of regression coefficients.
Book

Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies

TL;DR: Built to Last as mentioned in this paper examines 18 exceptional and long-lasting companies, including General Electric, Boeing, Disney, Hewlett-Packard and Proctor & Gamble, and compared each with one of its closest but less successful competitors, in order to discover exactly what has given it the edge over its rivals.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development

TL;DR: In this article, a study of Canadian firms in the oil and gas, mining, and forestry industries from 1986 to 1995 showed that both resource-based and institutional factors influence corporate sustainable development.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (3)
How Corporate Ethics Influences Corporate Climate Building?

The provided paper does not directly address the influence of corporate ethics on corporate climate building.

How does climate change affect the performance of businesses?

Climate change can affect the performance of businesses by causing distributional and procedural injustices, as well as externalizing environmental costs.