scispace - formally typeset
Book ChapterDOI

Metaphor and Thought: The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language

Michael J. Reddy
- pp 164-201
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, Schon's theme is replayed several octaves lower and the fundamental frequency is barely to be heard, even though it is a real and long awaited music.
Abstract
I should like to respond to Professor Schon's chapter by replaying his theme several octaves lower. In my opinion, he has struck exactly the right set of notes. “Problem setting” should indeed be considered the crucial process, as opposed to “problem solving.” And the “stories that people tell about troublesome situations” do set up or “mediate” the problem. And “frame conflict” between various stories should be studied in detail, precisely because it is quite often “immune to resolution by appeal to the facts.” It is hard to think of a better overture to genuine advance in the social and behavioral sciences than this. At the same time, it seems to me that Schon has managed to sound these excellent notes only in their overtones, so that the fundamental frequency is barely to be heard – even though, to my ears at least, Schon's kind of thinking is real and long awaited music. Quite simply, what I believe is missing is the application of Schon's wisdom – this paradigm-consciousness – to human communication itself. It may seem predictable that I, a linguist, would take such a position. But, if I do, it is hardly disciplinary narrow-mindedness that motivates me. In 1954, Norbert Wiener, one of the originators of information theory, and the “father of cybernetics,” stated quite flatly: “Society can only be understood through a study of the messages and communications facilities which belong to it” (Wiener, 1954, p. 16).

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One

TL;DR: In this article, two such metaphors are identified: the acquisition metaphor and the participation metaphor, and their entailments are discussed and evaluated, and the question of theoretical unification of research on learning is addressed, wherein the purpose is to show how too great a devotion to one particular metaphor can lead to theoretical distortions and to undesirable practices.
Book

Gesture and Thought

TL;DR: McNeill as mentioned in this paper argued that gestures are key ingredients in an Imagery-Language dialectic that fuels speech and thought; gestures are the "imagery" and also the components of language, rather than mere consequences.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor

TL;DR: This paper links the misunderstandings between engineers, technicians, and assemblers on a production floor to their work contexts, and demonstrates how members of these communities overcome such problems by cocreating common ground that transforms their understanding of the product and the production process.
Journal ArticleDOI

Language and agency

TL;DR: In this paper, a review describes and critiques some of the many ways agency has been conceptualized in the academy over the past few decades, focusing in particular on practice theorists such as Giddens, Bourdieu, de Certeau, Sahlins, and Ortner.
Journal ArticleDOI

The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science

TL;DR: This target article summarizes decades of cross-linguistic work by typologists and descriptive linguists, showing just how few and unprofound the universal characteristics of language are, once the authors honestly confront the diversity offered to us by the world's 6,000 to 8,000 languages.