Minimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients
TLDR
This study is the first to address minimally important differences (MIDs) for PROMIS measures in advanced-stage cancer patients by combining anchor- and distribution-based methods and focusing on item response theory-based MIDs estimated on a T-score scale.About:
This article is published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.The article was published on 2011-05-01 and is currently open access. It has received 456 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System & Raw score.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures
Cecilia A.C. Prinsen,Lidwine B. Mokkink,Lex M. Bouter,Jordi Alonso,Donald L. Patrick,H.C.W. de Vet,Caroline B. Terwee +6 more
TL;DR: The COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of PROMs includes methodology to combine the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties with the quality of the PROM itself (i.e., its measurement properties).
Journal ArticleDOI
A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting
TL;DR: Despite the existence of significant gaps in the evidence-base, there is growing evidence in support of routine PRO collection in enabling better and patient-centred care in cancer settings.
Journal ArticleDOI
Report of the NIH Task Force on research standards for chronic low back pain.
Richard A. Deyo,Samuel F. Dworkin,Dagmar Amtmann,Gunnar Andersson,David G. Borenstein,Eugene J. Carragee,John A. Carrino,Roger Chou,Karon F. Cook,Anthony Delitto,Christine Goertz,Partap S. Khalsa,John D. Loeser,Sean Mackey,James Panagis,James Rainville,Tor D. Tosteson,Dennis C. Turk,Michael Von Korff,Debra K. Weiner +19 more
TL;DR: A task force was convened by the NIH Pain Consortium with the goal of developing research standards for chronic low back pain, and results included recommendations for definitions, a minimum dataset, reporting outcomes, and future research.
Journal ArticleDOI
Clinical validity of PROMIS Depression, Anxiety, and Anger across diverse clinical samples
Benjamin D. Schalet,Paul A. Pilkonis,Lan Yu,Nathan E. Dodds,Kelly L. Johnston,Susan Yount,William T. Riley,David Cella +7 more
TL;DR: Evidence is provided that the PROMIS negative affect scores are sensitive to change in intervention studies in which negative affect is expected to change and this results inform the estimation of meaningful change and enable comparative effectiveness research.
Journal ArticleDOI
PROMIS measures of pain, fatigue, negative affect, physical function, and social function demonstrated clinical validity across a range of chronic conditions
Karon F. Cook,Sally E. Jensen,Benjamin D. Schalet,Jennifer L. Beaumont,Dagmar Amtmann,Susan M. Czajkowski,Darren A. DeWalt,James F. Fries,Paul A. Pilkonis,Bryce B. Reeve,Arthur A. Stone,Kevin P. Weinfurt,David Cella +12 more
TL;DR: The current body of clinical validity evidence for the nine PROMIS measures indicates the success of NIHPROMIS in developing measures that are effective across a range of chronic conditions.
References
More filters
Book
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
TL;DR: The concepts of power analysis are discussed in this paper, where Chi-square Tests for Goodness of Fit and Contingency Tables, t-Test for Means, and Sign Test are used.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
A. S. Zigmond,R. P. Snaith +1 more
TL;DR: It is suggested that the introduction of the scales into general hospital practice would facilitate the large task of detection and management of emotional disorder in patients under investigation and treatment in medical and surgical departments.
Journal ArticleDOI
Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale
TL;DR: Using a standard outcome across chronic pain studies would greatly enhance the comparability, validity, and clinical applicability of these studies, and the application of these results to future studies may provide a standard definition of clinically important improvement in clinical trials of chronic pain therapies.
Journal ArticleDOI
Measurement of health status: Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference
TL;DR: An approach to elucidating the significance of changes in score in quality of life instruments by comparing them to global ratings of change is developed, and a plausible range within which the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) falls is established.
Related Papers (5)
The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008
David Cella,William T. Riley,Arthur A. Stone,Nan E. Rothrock,Bryce B. Reeve,Susan Yount,Dagmar Amtmann,Rita K. Bode,Daniel J. Buysse,Seung W. Choi,Karon F. Cook,Robert F. DeVellis,Darren A. DeWalt,James F. Fries,Richard Gershon,Elizabeth A. Hahn,Jin Shei Lai,Paul A. Pilkonis,Dennis A. Revicki,Matthias Rose,Kevin P. Weinfurt,Ron D. Hays +21 more