scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

No First Use of Nuclear Weapons

Richard H. Ullman
- 01 Jul 1972 - 
- Vol. 50, Iss: 4, pp 669
TLDR
In his first speech to the United Nations, the leader of Peking's delegation to the General Assembly, Chiao Kuan-hua, stated on behalf of his government: "I once again solemnly declare that at no time and under no circumstances will China be the first to use nuclear weapons." And he continued : "If the United States and the Soviet Union really and truly want to disarm themselves, they should commit themselves not to be a first-use country as mentioned in this paper... This is not something difficult to do." Chiao's remarks, and their prominence
Abstract
IN his first speech to the General Assembly, the leader of Peking's delegation to the United Nations, Chiao Kuan-hua, stated on behalf of his government: "I once again solemnly declare that at no time and under no circumstances will China be the first to use nuclear weapons." And he continued : "If the United States and the Soviet Union really and truly want dis armament, they should commit themselves not to be the first to use nuclear weapons. This is not something difficult to do." Chiao's remarks, and their prominence in the first official state ment by a representative of the People's Republic of China before the United Nations, came as no surprise : the declaration that China would not be the first to use nuclear weapons has been a staple of Peking's foreign policy, constantly reiterated, ever since the first Chinese nuclear explosion in October 1964. From a Chinese point of view, such assurances made eminent good sense. In their first years, the few Chinese nuclear weapons and their manufacturing facilities offered a tempting target for a preemptive enemy. Indeed, it was more than once rumored first that the United States and then that the Soviet Union was plan ning such an attack. Even today a first strike could very largely eliminate China's nuclear capabilities. In so far as a solemn dec laration foreswearing first use tends to make it morally more difficult for others to use nuclear weapons against China, the P.R.C. continues to be well served by it. Moreover, it is also self-evident that, given the marked disparities between the Chi nese nuclear force as it will be for the rest of the 1970s and the forces possessed by the United States and the Soviet Union, first use by China against either "nuclear superpower" (a term the Chinese use only derogatorily) would be suicidal. Now that Peking is at last represented at the United Nations, it is likely that the theme of no first use of nuclear weapons will be heard with increased frequency and from increasing numbers of voices among the non-nuclear powers, fearful as they are that some day, in some perhaps unforeseeable circumstance, nuclear weapons might be used against them. The United States and the Soviet Union will undoubtedly be under more pressure to declare

read more

Citations
More filters
Book

The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons Since 1945

TL;DR: Tannenwald as discussed by the authors traces the rise of the nuclear taboo, the forces that produced it, and its influence on US leaders, and analyzes four critical instances where US leaders considered using nuclear weapons (Japan 1945, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and the Gulf War 1991).
Journal ArticleDOI

Nuclear Strategy: the Case for a Theory of Victory

TL;DR: In this paper, the value of arms control negotiations and weapons systems evaluations when there is no firm strategic force posture is questioned and the evolution of pre-war deterrence as a policy of assured destruction is outlined and examined in terms of whether the concept is rational or likely to be effective.
Journal ArticleDOI

No First Use: The Next Step for U.S. Nuclear Policy

TL;DR: The Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) as discussed by the authors concluded an intense, yearlong effort to revamp U.S. nuclear weapons policy to better address modern threats, but there were strong disagreements over what kinds of changes should be made.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nuclear Africa: weapons, power and proliferation

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the rather limited African experience of nuclear weapons, and the implications of global nuclear weapon possession and proliferation -and responses against it - for Africa, and contextualise these issues in the global framework.