scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook ChapterDOI

Our data, ourselves: privacy via distributed noise generation

TLDR
In this paper, a distributed protocol for generating shares of random noise, secure against malicious participants, was proposed, where the purpose of the noise generation is to create a distributed implementation of the privacy-preserving statistical databases described in recent papers.
Abstract
In this work we provide efficient distributed protocols for generating shares of random noise, secure against malicious participants. The purpose of the noise generation is to create a distributed implementation of the privacy-preserving statistical databases described in recent papers [14,4,13]. In these databases, privacy is obtained by perturbing the true answer to a database query by the addition of a small amount of Gaussian or exponentially distributed random noise. The computational power of even a simple form of these databases, when the query is just of the form ∑if(di), that is, the sum over all rows i in the database of a function f applied to the data in row i, has been demonstrated in [4]. A distributed implementation eliminates the need for a trusted database administrator. The results for noise generation are of independent interest. The generation of Gaussian noise introduces a technique for distributing shares of many unbiased coins with fewer executions of verifiable secret sharing than would be needed using previous approaches (reduced by a factor of n). The generation of exponentially distributed noise uses two shallow circuits: one for generating many arbitrarily but identically biased coins at an amortized cost of two unbiased random bits apiece, independent of the bias, and the other to combine bits of appropriate biases to obtain an exponential distribution.

read more

Citations
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Differentially private multi-party computation

TL;DR: This paper generalizes the results and proves that a simple non-interactive randomized response mechanism is optimal and holds for all privacy levels, heterogenous privacy levels across parties, all types of functions to be computed, all kinds of cost metrics, and both average and worst-case measures of accuracy.
Book ChapterDOI

Challenging Differential Privacy: The Case of Non-interactive Mechanisms

TL;DR: This paper considers personalized recommendation systems in which before publication, the profile of a user is sanitized by a non-interactive mechanism compliant with the concept of differential privacy, and compares two inference attacks, namely single and joint decoding.
Posted Content

Differential Privacy as a Causal Property

TL;DR: This work believes this characterization resolves disagreement and confusion in prior work about the consequences of differential privacy and opens up the possibility of applying results from statistics, experimental design, and science about causation while studying differential privacy.
Posted Content

The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacy

TL;DR: In this paper, an upper bound on the overall privacy level of differentially private multi-party computation was established, and a sequence of privatization mechanisms were constructed to achieve the upper bound.
Book ChapterDOI

Comparing Local and Central Differential Privacy Using Membership Inference Attacks

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compare local and central differential privacy based on the privacy parameters, which can lead to incorrect conclusions, since different privacy parameters are reflecting different types of mechanisms.
References
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis

TL;DR: In this article, the authors show that for several particular applications substantially less noise is needed than was previously understood to be the case, and also show the separation results showing the increased value of interactive sanitization mechanisms over non-interactive.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Byzantine Generals Problem

TL;DR: The Albanian Generals Problem as mentioned in this paper is a generalization of Dijkstra's dining philosophers problem, where two generals have to come to a common agreement on whether to attack or retreat, but can communicate only by sending messengers who might never arrive.
Book ChapterDOI

The Byzantine generals problem

TL;DR: In this article, a group of generals of the Byzantine army camped with their troops around an enemy city are shown to agree upon a common battle plan using only oral messages, if and only if more than two-thirds of the generals are loyal; so a single traitor can confound two loyal generals.
Journal Article

Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis

TL;DR: The study is extended to general functions f, proving that privacy can be preserved by calibrating the standard deviation of the noise according to the sensitivity of the function f, which is the amount that any single argument to f can change its output.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

How to play ANY mental game

TL;DR: This work presents a polynomial-time algorithm that, given as a input the description of a game with incomplete information and any number of players, produces a protocol for playing the game that leaks no partial information, provided the majority of the players is honest.