scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Perceptions of quality in primary health care: perspectives of patients and professionals based on focus group discussions

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The aggregated opinions, expectations and priorities of patients and professionals along some main dimensions of quality in primary health care, such as access, equity, appropriateness and patient- centeredness are presented.
Abstract
The EUprimecare project-team assessed the perception of primary health care (PHC) professionals and patients on quality of organization of PHC systems in the participating countries: Estonia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania and Spain. This article presents the aggregated opinions, expectations and priorities of patients and professionals along some main dimensions of quality in primary health care, such as access, equity, appropriateness and patient- centeredness. The focus group technique was applied in the study as a qualitative research method for exploration of attitudes regarding the health care system and health service. Discussions were addressing the topics of: general aspects of quality in primary health care; possibilities to receive/provide PHC services based on both parties needs; determinant factors of accessibility to PHC services; patient centeredness. The data sets collected during the focus group discussions were evaluated using the method of thematic analysis. There were 14 focus groups in total: a professional and a patient group in each of the seven partner countries. Findings of the thematic analysis were summarized along the following dimensions: access and equity, appropriateness (coordination, continuity, competency and comprehensiveness) and patient centeredness. This study shows perceptions and views of patients in interaction with PHC and opinion of professionals working in PHC. It serves as source of criteria with relevance to everyday practice and experience. The criteria mentioned by patients and by health care professionals which were considered determining factors of the quality in primary care were quite similar among the investigated countries. However, the perception and the level of tolerance regarding some of the criteria differed among EUprimecare countries. Among these dissimilar criteria we especially note the gate-keeping role of GPs, the importance of nurses' competency and the acceptance of waiting times. The impact of waiting time on patient satisfaction is obvious; the influence of equity and access to PHC services are more dependent on the equal distribution of settings and doctors in urban and rural area. Foreseen shortage of doctors is expected to have a substantial influence on patient satisfaction in the near future.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The benefits of co-location in primary care practices: the perspectives of general practitioners and patients in 34 countries

TL;DR: It is highlighted that GP mono- and multi-disciplinary co-location is related to positive outcomes at a GP level, such as a broader provision of technical procedures, increased collaboration among different providers and wider coordination with secondary care, however, GP co- location, particularly in a multidisciplinary setting, isrelated to less positive patient experiences.
Journal ArticleDOI

Experienced time pressure and stress: electronic health records usability and information technology competence play a role.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined EHR usability factors and nurses' informatics competence factors related to self-reported time pressure and psychological distress, and found that low EHR reliability and low support for cooperation were associated with high psychological distress.
Journal ArticleDOI

Overall satisfaction of health care users with the quality of and access to health care services: a cross-sectional study in six Central and Eastern European countries

TL;DR: A multi-country analysis of the satisfaction of health care users with the quality of and access to health care services in six Central and Eastern European countries suggests that there is ample room for improvements.
Journal ArticleDOI

Perceptions of primary care in Korea: a comparison of patient and physician focus group discussions

TL;DR: Focus group discussions revealed that discrepancies in perception have resulted from Korea's distorted healthcare delivery system, undifferentiated roles among healthcare organizations, patients' freedom of choice in selecting healthcare providers and other institutional factors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Patient satisfaction with nurse-delivery primary health care services in Free State and Gauteng provinces, South Africa: A comparative study

TL;DR: High levels of satisfaction with PHC services were experienced by study participants in both provinces, and nurses should continue listening, respecting and treating their patients with politeness, and also implement efficient work schedules to reduce patient waiting times.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Using thematic analysis in psychology

TL;DR: Thematic analysis is a poorly demarcated, rarely acknowledged, yet widely used qualitative analytic method within psychology as mentioned in this paper, and it offers an accessible and theoretically flexible approach to analysing qualitative data.
Book

Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a survey of the focus group research, focusing on the following topics: planning the group study, developing a questioning route, participants in a focus group, moderating skills, and conducting interviews with young people.
Journal ArticleDOI

Contribution of Primary Care to Health Systems and Health

TL;DR: The means by which primary care improves health have been identified, thus suggesting ways to improve overall health and reduce differences in health across major population subgroups.
Journal Article

Focus group discussion: a tool for health and medical research.

TL;DR: This paper presents a general introduction of the use of focus groups as a research tool within the context of health research, with the intention of promoting its use among researchers in healthcare.