scispace - formally typeset
Open Access

Performance Evaluation of the Early CNAV Navigation Message

TLDR
In this article, a signal-in-space range error (SISRE) of about 1.1 m is obtained for the CNAV message whereas it is 0.6 m for the legacy navigation message (LNAV).
Abstract
Following an initial test campaign in June 2013, the GPS Directorate has initiated a pre-operational routine generation and transmission of the Civil Navigation Message CNAV starting on 28 April 2014. The new message is broadcast by Block IIR-M satellites on the L2C signal as well as the L2C and L5 signals of the Block IIF satellites. The improved resolution and larger number of parameters in the new CNAV ephemeris message offers a notably reduced ephemeris fitting error and largely avoids the discontinuities of consecutive ephemeris messages from the same upload. CNAV data of the Block IIR-M and IIF satellites have been collected since the start of transmission using a small set of globally distributed receivers offering an almost continuous coverage. Based on comparison with precise ephemerides of the International GNSS Service (IGS), a Signal-in-Space Range Error (SISRE) of about 1.1 m is obtained for the CNAV message whereas it is 0.6 m for the legacy navigation message (LNAV). This degraded performance is related to less frequent CNAV updates resulting in prediction times of up to four days. For a three week period with a daily CNAV update rate almost the same SISRE is obtained as for LNAV. Complementary to the SISRE analysis, the new Inter-Signal Corrections (ISCs) have been monitored, which enable users to correctly account for differential code biases (DCBs) when using other signals than the L1/L2 P(Y)-code observations in real-time positioning applications. The broadcast ISC values agree with DCBs derived in the frame of the IGS Multi-GNSS Experiment and DCBs from the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe on the 0.1 – 2 ns level depending on the ISC type. While users of the the civil L1C/A and L2C signals have, so far, experienced a notably degraded positioning, the ISCs now enable a single point positioning accuracy that is fully competitive with that of semi-codeless P(Y)-code receivers.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) of the International GNSS Service (IGS) - Achievements, prospects and challenges

TL;DR: The status and tracking capabilities of the IGS monitoring station network are presented and the multi-GNSS products derived from this resource are discussed and the achieved performance is assessed and related to the current level of space segment and user equipment characterization.
Journal ArticleDOI

Determination of differential code biases with multi-GNSS observations

TL;DR: The results indicate that GPS and GLONASS intra-frequency biases obtained in this work show the same precision levels as those estimated by DLR (about 0.1 and 0.4 ns for the two constellations, respectively, with respect to the products of CODE).
Journal ArticleDOI

Multi-GNSS signal-in-space range error assessment – Methodology and results

TL;DR: The present study reviews the fundamental concepts and underlying assumptions of signal-in-space range error (SISRE) analyses and presents a harmonized framework for multi-GNSS performance monitoring based on the comparison of broadcast and precise ephemerides to contribute to a better understanding and harmonization of multi- GNSS SISRE analyses and their use as key performance indicators for the various constellations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Galileo status: orbits, clocks, and positioning

TL;DR: The European Global Navigation Satellite System Galileo is close to declaration of initial services and dual-frequency single point positioning with broadcast orbits and clocks of nine Galileo satellites that have so far been declared healthy already enables an accuracy at a few meters.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Comparing the ‘Big 4’ - A User's View on GNSS Performance

TL;DR: The determination and prediction of GNSS satellite orbits and clocks from measurements of global receiver networks, which forms the basis for precise point positioning applications, are discussed and the significance of satellite metadata knowledge is highlighted.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) of the International GNSS Service (IGS) - Achievements, prospects and challenges

TL;DR: The status and tracking capabilities of the IGS monitoring station network are presented and the multi-GNSS products derived from this resource are discussed and the achieved performance is assessed and related to the current level of space segment and user equipment characterization.

RINEX: The Receiver Independent Exchange Format Version 2.11

Werner Gurtner, +1 more
TL;DR: (Revision, April 1993) (Clarification December 1993), (Doppler Definition: January 1994), (PR Clarification: October 1994) (Wlfact Clarification): February 1995)

RINEX - The Receiver Independent Exchange Format - Version 3.00

Werner Gurtner, +1 more
Abstract: (Revision, April 1993) (Clarification December 1993) (Doppler Definition: January 1994) (PR Clarification: October 1994) (Wlfact Clarification: February 1995) (Event Time Frame Clarification: May 1996) (Minor errors in the examples A7/A8: May 1996) (Naming convention for compressed met files; January 1997) (Continuation line clarifications: April 1997) (GLONASS Extensions: April 1997) (Met sensor description and position records: April 1997) (Wavelength factor clarifications: April 1997) (Error in example A12: CORR TO SYSTEM TIME, April 1997) (Redefinition of sv clock params in GLONASS Nav Mess Files: March 1998) (Naming conventions for compressed RINEX obs files: March 1998) (GPS week: No roll-over, continuous number: March 1998) (Error in compressed DOS file naming convention: July 1998) (Table A13 contained blank satellite identifiers: Sept 1998) (Discrepancy between Tables A5 and A9 removed: Sept 1998)
Journal ArticleDOI

GNSS processing at CODE: status report

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on the generation of the combined global products at CODE, where they put emphasis not only on accuracy, but also on completeness, and study the impact of GLONASS on the CODE products, and the benefit of using them.
Journal ArticleDOI

Determination of differential code biases with multi-GNSS observations

TL;DR: The results indicate that GPS and GLONASS intra-frequency biases obtained in this work show the same precision levels as those estimated by DLR (about 0.1 and 0.4 ns for the two constellations, respectively, with respect to the products of CODE).
Related Papers (5)