scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Polygraph and interview validation of self-reported deviant behavior.

John P. Clark, +1 more
- 01 Aug 1966 - 
- Vol. 31, Iss: 4, pp 516-523
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Responses to anonymous questionnaires involving a wide range of deviant behavioral items, including the Dentler-Monroe and NyeShort delinquency scale items, were compared to responses made during a follow-up "interview" and polygraph examination.
Abstract
In the study of deviant behavior, current heavy reliance upon data from anonymous questionnaires demands concern for data validity. Responses to anonymous questionnaires involving a wide range of deviant behavioral items, including the Dentler-Monroe and NyeShort delinquency scale items, were compared to responses made during a follow-up "interview" and polygraph examination. The overall accuracy of the total questionnaire was high although results indicate significant inaccuracy on those items used in delinquency scales. However, a high degree of association was found between the respondent order established by the scales using data from questionnaire and polygraph results. Response inaccuracy was highly related to declared personal norms and reference group norms.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Development of a measure of workplace deviance.

TL;DR: A broad, theoretically derived measure(s) of deviant behavior in the workplace found to have internal reliabilities of .81 and .78, respectively and verified that a 2-factor structure had acceptable fit.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sensitive questions in surveys.

TL;DR: The article reviews the research done by survey methodologists on reporting errors in surveys on sensitive topics, noting parallels and differences from the psychological literature on social desirability.
Journal ArticleDOI

Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior.

TL;DR: This article reviews and integrates current literature on measurement error and participation bias in sex research, with an emphasis on collecting sexual information in the context of AIDS.