scispace - formally typeset
Book ChapterDOI

Post-modernism, gender and development

Jane L. Parpart
- pp 263-274
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The post-modern critique, with its attention to difference and discourse, and its attack on the universalizing truths of Enlightenment thinking, has much to offer those who are critical of development theory and practice as discussed by the authors.
Abstract
The post-modern critique, with its attention to difference and discourse, and its attack on the universalizing truths of Enlightenment thinking, has much to offer those who are critical of development theory and practice. Some Third World and Western scholars have drawn on this perspective to challenge the assumption that modernization is necessarily possible or desirable. They have questioned the belief that Third World development and westernization/modernization are synonomous and that Western political, social and economic institutions and practices (whether liberal or socialist) hold the answers to the Third World’s development problems (Escobar 1984; Ferguson 1985, 1990; Moore 1992).

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

An agenda for thinking about 'race' in development

TL;DR: The authors reveal some of the silences about race in development ideologies, institutions and practices and suggest that these mask the perpetuation of a racialized discourse in development, its complicity with broader historical and contemporary racial projects and the effects of race on the processes and consequences of development.
Journal ArticleDOI

Engendering development and disasters

TL;DR: It is argued that if disaster risk reduction initiatives are to reduce women's vulnerability, they need to focus explicitly on the root causes of this vulnerability and design programmes that specifically focus on reducing gender inequalities by challenging unequal gendered power relations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Critiquing ‘race’ and racism in development discourse and practice:

TL;DR: Arnab et al. as mentioned in this paper explore how racialized forms of power and inequality build upon this foundational distinction between the developed and developing and draw attention to the various, unspoken assumptions about race that underpin some of the key ideological bases of development thought and practice.

From Colonial Administration to Development Studies: a Postcolonial Critique of the History of Development Studies

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the colonial genealogy of development studies through the lives and experiences of individuals whose careers stretch across different historical moments encompassing the administration of colonies and the establishment and emergence of the development studies in institutes of higher education in the UK.