scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Reinforced granular column for deep soil stabilization: A review

TLDR
A review of the geosynthetic encased stone column as a ground improvement technique is presented in this article, where the authors identify key considerations for the general use of encased Stone columns, provide insights for design and construction, and compile the latest research developments.
Abstract
The engineering structures constructed on thick deposits of soft soil strata have problems of low bearing capacity, excessive total and differential settlement, lateral spreading etc. To mitigate such problems, different ground improvement techniques are available namely; vertical drains, lime/cement column, stone (granular) column etc. in view of their proven performance, short time schedule, durability, constructability and low costs. Stone column technique seems to be very suitable and favourable ground improvement technique for deep soft soil improvement. Further to prevent excessive bulging, squeezing of stone into soft soil, stone column can be encased with suitable geosynthetic. Another advantage of encasement is having high load carrying capacity and lesser settlement of composite foundation. This paper presents the current state of the geosynthetic encased stone column as a ground improvement technique. A review is provided aiming to: (a) identify key considerations for the general use of encased stone columns, (b) provide insights for design and construction, (c) compile the latest research developments. Case histories of field applications and observed field performance are cited to portray different stone column applications and observed effectiveness. The paper identifies areas where more research is needed and includes recommendations for future research and development.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Experimental study of ground improvement by using encased stone columns

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the use of vertically and horizontally reinforced stone columns, as a remedial measure for ordinary unreinforced stone columns to increase the stiffness of soft soils which contributes to its load carrying capacity and accelerates the process of consolidation leading to reduction in settlement.
Book ChapterDOI

Geotextile-Encased Columns: Case Studies over Twenty Years

TL;DR: The geotextile-encased columns (GEC) as discussed by the authors is the state-of-the-art in the world for embankments and dikes on soft soils.
Journal ArticleDOI

Enhancement of Soft Soil Behaviour by using Floating Bottom Ash Columns

TL;DR: In this paper, bottom ash is used as a substitute material in a granular column to decrease settlement and enhance the bearing capacity of soft soil, which is a derivate of coal burning process, it has similar engineering properties to sand and fine gravel.
Journal ArticleDOI

Fully coupled solution for the consolidation of poroelastic soil around geosynthetic encased stone columns

TL;DR: In this paper, an extension of a recently developed fully coupled elastoplastic method (Pulko and Logar, 2016) was presented for the analysis of a poroelastic thick-walled soil cylinder around an elastplastic end-bearing stone column to account for the influence of an elastic geosynthetic encasement.
Journal ArticleDOI

Seismic Performance of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns

TL;DR: The geotextile-encased columns (GECs) as mentioned in this paper were introduced in 1994 for embankments on soft or problematic soils, and the GECs consist of compacted granular fill similar to common stone columns.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: Numerical evaluation

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the qualitative and quantitative improvement in load capacity of the stone column by encasement through a comprehensive parametric study using the finite element analysis and found that the encased stone columns have much higher load carrying capacities and undergo lesser compressions and lesser lateral bulging as compared to conventional stone columns.
Journal ArticleDOI

Studies on the Behavior of Single and Group of Geosynthetic Encased Stone Columns

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the qualitative and quantitative improvement of individual load capacity of stone column by encasement through laboratory model tests conducted on stone columns installed in clay bed prepared in controlled condition in a large scale testing tank.
Journal ArticleDOI

Improvement of soft soils using geogrid encased stone columns

TL;DR: In this article, the results of a series of small-scale model column tests that were undertaken to investigate the behaviour of geogrid encased columns were discussed. And the results indicated a steady reduction in vertical strain with increasing encased length for both isolated columns and group columns and a significant increase in column stiffness and further reduction in column strain was observed for fully-encased columns.
Journal ArticleDOI

Model tests on geosynthetic-encased stone columns

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the qualitative and quantitative improvement of load capacity of individual encased stone columns through laboratory model tests and found that the load-carrying capacity of the encasement improves load transfer to deeper depths of soil.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparative study on the behavior of encased stone column and conventional stone column

TL;DR: In this paper, the behavior of the encased stone column stabilized bed is experimentally investigated and analyzed numerically, and material behaviour is simulated using Soft Soil, Mohr Coulomb and Geogrid models for clay, stone material and encasement respectively and validated with experimental results.