Reproducibility and relation to mean heart rate of heart rate variability in normal subjects and in patients with congestive heart failure secondary to coronary artery disease.

TLDR: Before heart rate (HR) variability can be used for predictive purposes in the clinical setting, day-to-day variation and reproducibility need to be defined as do relations to mean HR.

Abstract: Before heart rate (HR) variability can be used for predictive purposes in the clinical setting, day-to-day variation and reproducibility need to be defined as do relations to mean HR. HR variability and mean HR were therefore determined in 2 successive 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiograms obtained from 33 normal subjects (age 34 +/- 7 years, group I), and 22 patients with coronary disease and stable congestive heart failure (CHF) (age 59 +/- 7 years, group II). Three measures were used: (1) SDANN (standard deviation of all mean 5-minute normal sinus RR intervals in successive 5-minute recording periods over 24 hours); (2) SD (the mean of the standard deviation of all normal sinus RR intervals in successive 5-minute recording periods over 24 hours); and (3) CV (coefficient of variation of the SD measure), a new measure that compensates for HR effects. Group mean HR was higher and HR variability lower in group II than in group I (80 +/- 10 vs 74 +/- 9 beats/min, p less than 0.04). Mean group values for HR and HR variability showed good correlations between days 1 and 2 (mean RR, r = 0.89, 0.97; SDANN, r = 0.87, 0.87; SD, r = 0.93, 0.97; CV, r = 0.95, 0.97 in groups I and II, respectively). In contrast, considerable individual day-to-day variation occurred (group I, 0 to 46%; group II, 0 to 51%). Low HR variability values were more consistent than high values. SDANN and SD correlated moderately with HR in both groups (r = 0.50 to 0.64). The CV measure minimizes HR effects on HR variability.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)