scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Required Unfactored Strength of Geosynthetic in Reinforced Earth Structures

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, a simple limit equilibrium methodology is presented to determine the unfactored global geosynthetic strength required to ensure sufficient internal stability in reinforced earth structures, and the global strength is then distributed among individual layers using three different assumed distribution functions.
Abstract
Current reinforced earth structure designs arbitrarily distinguish between reinforced walls and slopes, that is, the batter of walls is 20° or less while in slopes it is larger than 20°. This has led to disjointed design methodologies where walls employ a lateral earth pressure approach and slopes utilize limit equilibrium analyses. The earth pressure approach used is either simplified (e.g., ignoring facing effects), approximated (e.g., considering facing effects only partially), or purely empirical. It results in selection of a geosynthetic with a long-term strength that is potentially overly conservative or, by virtue of ignoring statics, potentially unconservative. The limit equilibrium approach used in slopes deals explicitly with global equilibrium only; it is ambiguous about the load in individual layers. Presented is a simple limit equilibrium methodology to determine the unfactored global geosynthetic strength required to ensure sufficient internal stability in reinforced earth structures. This approach allows for seamless integration of the design methodologies for reinforced earth walls and slopes. The methodology that is developed accounts for the sliding resistance of the facing. The results are displayed in the form of dimensionless stability charts. Given the slope angle, the design frictional strength of the soil, and the toe resistance, the required global unfactored strength of the reinforcement can be determined using these charts. The global strength is then distributed among individual layers using three different assumed distribution functions. It is observed that, generally, the assumed distribution functions have secondary effects on the trace of the critical slip surface. The impact of the distribution function on the required global strength of reinforcement is minor and exists only when there is no toe resistance, when the slope tends to be vertical, or when the soil has low strength. Conversely, the impact of the distribution function on the maximum unfactored load in individual layers, a value which is typically used to select the geosynthetics, can result in doubling its required long-term strength.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A comparison of static and cyclic loading responses of foundations on geocell-reinforced sand

TL;DR: In this article, the results of laboratory-model tests on strip footings supported on unreinforced and geocell-reinforced sand beds under a combination of static and repeated loads are presented The influences of various parameters are studied including reinforcement width, height of the geocell below the footing base and various amplitudes of repeated load.
Journal ArticleDOI

Three-dimensional reinforced slopes: Evaluation of required reinforcement strength and embedment length using limit analysis

TL;DR: In this paper, the three-dimensional effects of 3D conditions on reinforced earth structure stability are considered, and employed to determine the required strength and length of reinforcement using a Limit Analysis approach.
Journal ArticleDOI

Post-construction performance of a two-tiered geogrid reinforced soil wall backfilled with soil-rock mixture

TL;DR: In this paper, a 17m high two-tiered reinforced soil wall backfilled with soil-rock mixture was instrumented for its performance under gravity load after construction, and the instrumentation continued for 15 months.
Journal ArticleDOI

Impact of Toe Resistance in Reinforced Masonry Block Walls: Design Dilemma

TL;DR: In this article, the authors identify the magnitude of toe resistance and critically review whether such high resistance is universally suitable for design and show that high toe resistance may not be feasible for most foundation soils.
Journal ArticleDOI

Field Instrumentation and Evaluation of Modular-Block MSE Walls with Secondary Geogrid Layers

TL;DR: In this article, the use of secondary reinforcement between primary reinforcement layers was proposed to alleviate wall-facing bulging in the practice, but this idea was not verified in the field.
References
More filters
Book

Specifications for highway bridges

TL;DR: GNERAL FUSI>@PF DK2B504<18!T9＀X=:M���
Journal ArticleDOI

Large-Scale Shaking Table Tests on Modular-Block Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an experimental study of the earthquake performance of modular-block reinforced soil retaining walls which were backfilled with sand using large-scale benchmark shaking table tests.
Journal ArticleDOI

Tensile strength, tension cracks, and stability of slopes.

TL;DR: In this article, the effect of tensial strength on the stability of slopes was evaluated using a variational approach to limiting equilibrium problems, and it was found that the maximum depth of tension cracks is 25% of the slope height, and this value occurs for vertical slopes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls as Important Permanent Structures 1996 - 1997 Mercer Lecture

TL;DR: In this paper, a geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining wall with full-height rigid facings was constructed in Japan as important permanent structures mainly for railways and occasionally for highways.

Design manual for segmental retaining walls

TL;DR: The use of segmental retaining walls has increased in residence, highways, and other commercial and municipal projects as mentioned in this paper, which provides design methodologies, installation procedures and sample specifications for the walls.
Related Papers (5)