scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal Article

Reverse SolangeProtecting the essence of fundamental rights against EU Member States

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors present an innovative approach to EU fundamental rights protection against the Member States, drawing on recent studies which have shown that the fundamental rights situation in a number of Member States is an increasing cause for concern, particularly with respect to media freedom.
Abstract
This article presents an innovative approach to EU fundamental rights protection against the Member States. It draws on recent studies which have shown that the fundamental rights situation in a number of Member States is an increasing cause for concern, particularly with respect to media freedom. However, while the Union intensely scrutinizes the fundamental rights situations in candidate countries, there is scant action so far in case of serious problems in the Member States. Although the latter are comprehensively committed to "respect for human rights" according to Art 2 TEU and subject to the enforcement mechanism foreseen by Art 7 TEU this has proven to be of very limited practical impact. Therefore, the article suggests opening up "respect for human rights" for individual legal actions via Union citizenship. Its starting point is the recent jurisprudential development of the "substance" of Union citizenship in Ruiz Zambrano. This substance can and should basically be defined with reference to the essence of fundamental rights enshrined in Article 2 TEU. To put this into practice the article suggests a reverse Solange-doctrine, applied by the ECJ towards the Member States: outside the scope of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights the Member States remain autonomous in fundamental rights protection as long as it can be presumed that they ensure the essence of fundamental rights enshrined in Article 2 TEU. However, should this presumption be rebutted, the "substance" of Union citizenship - within the meaning of Ruiz Zambrano - comes into play. On this basis Union citizens can seek redress before national courts and the ECJ.

read more

Citations
More filters
Posted Content

Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union

TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide a critical overview of options available to the EU to deal with the Rule of Law crisis in some of the Member States. But they also warn of the possible problems related to the involvement of the EU's involvement with the constitutional core of the member states.
Journal ArticleDOI

Can courts rescue national democracy? Judicial safeguards against democratic backsliding in the EU

TL;DR: In this paper, the potential efficacy and limitations of existing judicial mechanisms as tools to combat democratic backsliding in European Union (EU) member states are explored, and the authors conclude that despite their importance, judicial safeguards alone will not suffice to stop democratic back-sliding by a determined national government.
MonographDOI

Human Rights in the Council of Europe and the European Union: Achievements, Trends and Challenges

TL;DR: The main achievements of relevant institutions include securing minimum standards across the continent as they deal with increasing expansion, complexity, multidimensionality, and interpenetration of their human rights activities as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Monitoring and enforcement of the rule of law in the EU: rhetoric and reality

TL;DR: In this paper, a comprehensive examination of the rationale underlying the rule of law framework adopted by the Commission in March 2014 before outlining its main features is presented, and a number of modest recommendations are also offered at a time where an increasing number of voices are asking the Commission to activate the first phase its new mechanism in relation to Hungary and more recently, Poland.
Posted Content

Monitoring and Enforcement of the Rule of Law in the EU: Rhetoric and Reality

TL;DR: In this article, a comprehensive examination of the rationale underlying the rule of law framework adopted by the Commission in March 2014 before outlining its main features is presented, and a number of modest recommendations are also offered at a time where an increasing number of voices are asking the Commission to activate the first phase its new mechanism in relation to Hungary and more recently, Poland.