scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Semiparametric inference of competing risks data with additive hazards and missing cause of failure under MCAR or MAR assumptions

Laurent Bordes, +2 more
- 01 Jan 2014 - 
- Vol. 8, Iss: 1, pp 41-95
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors considered a semiparametric model for lifetime data with competing risks and missing causes of death, and derived estimators of the regression and functional parameters under the missing at random (MAR) mechanism.
Abstract
In this paper, we consider a semiparametric model for lifetime data with competing risks and missing causes of death. We assume that an additive hazards model holds for each cause-specific hazard rate function and that a random right censoring occurs. Our goal is to estimate the regression parameters as well as the functional parameters such as the baseline and cause-specific cumulative hazard rate functions / cumulative incidence functions. We first introduce preliminary estimators of the unknown (Euclidean and functional) parameters when cause of death indicators are missing completely at random (MCAR). These estimators are obtained using the observations with known cause of failure. The advantage of considering the MCAR model is that the information given by the observed lifetimes with unknown failure cause can be used to improve the preliminary estimates in order to attain an asymptotic optimality criterion. This is the main purpose of our work. However, since it is often more realistic to consider a missing at random (MAR) mechanism, we also derive estimators of the regression and functional parameters under the MAR model. We study the large sample properties of our estimators through martingales and empirical process techniques. We also provide a simulation study to compare the behavior of our three types of estimators under the different mechanisms of missingness. It is shown that our improved estimators under MCAR assumption are quite robust if only the MAR assumption holds. Finally, three illustrations on real datasets are also given.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Semiparametric regression and risk prediction with competing risks data under missing cause of failure

TL;DR: Simulation studies show that the estimators perform well even in the presence of a large fraction of missing cause of failures, and that the regression coefficient estimator can be substantially more efficient compared to the previously proposed augmented inverse probability weighting estimator.
Journal ArticleDOI

Semiparametric regression and risk prediction with competing risks data under missing cause of failure

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed a unified framework for inference about both the regression coefficients of the proportional cause-specific hazards model and the covariate-specific cumulative incidence functions under missing at random cause of failure.
Book ChapterDOI

On Competing Risks with Masked Failures

TL;DR: In this article, some statistical inference procedures used when the cause of failure is missing or masked for some units are reviewed.
Posted Content

Semiparametric Marginal Regression for Clustered Competing Risks Data with Missing Cause of Failure

TL;DR: In this paper, a maximum partial pseudolikelihood estimator under a missing at random assumption was proposed for population-averaged analysis with clustered competing risks data with informative cluster size and missing causes of failure.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Estimation of Regression Coefficients When Some Regressors are not Always Observed

TL;DR: In this paper, a new class of semiparametric estimators, based on inverse probability weighted estimating equations, were proposed for parameter vector α 0 of the conditional mean model when the data are missing at random in the sense of Rubin and the missingness probabilities are either known or can be parametrically modeled.
Book

Counting Processes and Survival Analysis

TL;DR: The Martingale Central Limit Theorem as mentioned in this paper is a generalization of the central limit theorem of the Counting Process and the Local Square Integrable Martingales (LSIM) framework.
Book

Competing Risks: A Practical Perspective

TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed a method to estimate the probability of a cancer event in the presence of competing risks using the Kaplan-Meier method. But the method is not suitable for the case of cancer patients.
Book

Classical Competing Risks

TL;DR: In this paper, Martingale et al. proposed a model for estimating the probability of failure of a small subset of survival data in a large set of small data sets, based on Bernoulli trials.
Related Papers (5)