scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

The Analysis of Random Effects in Modeling Studies.

C. James Scheirer, +1 more
- 01 Sep 1979 - 
- Vol. 50, Iss: 3, pp 752-757
TLDR
In this article, the concept of a random factor is discussed along with its application to and relevance for modeling research, and a practical solution to the problem is proposed, where the experimenter conceptualizes a study as providing the basis for a generalization to a larger population of models.
Abstract
SCHEIRER, C. JAMES, and GELLER, SANFORD E. The Analysis of Random Effects in Modeling Studies. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1979, 50, 752-757. Much of the research on modeling has used single models or, when multiple models have been used, a questionable data analysis has been applied. The analytic and conceptual difficulty revolves around the decision whether to treat models as a fixed or as a random factor in the analysis. We argue that in almost all cases the experimenter conceptualizes a study as providing the basis for a generalization to a larger population of models. Since this is the case, models must be analyzed as a random factor or a positive bias is introduced into the results. In this paper the concept of a random factor is discussed along with its application to and relevance for modeling research. Worked examples are provided, and a practical solution to the problem is proposed.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The generous elderly: naturalistic studies of donations across the life span.

TL;DR: In this paper, the relation between age and altruism was examined in two experiments conducted in naturalistic settings, where individuals from 5 to over 75 years of age had opportunities to donate money to a charity concerned with the welfare of infants with birth defects.
Journal ArticleDOI

Power and measures of effect size in analysis of variance with fixed versus random nested factors.

TL;DR: The authors discuss circumstances under which the treatment of nested provider effects as fixed as opposed to random is appropriate and present 2 formulas for the correct estimation of effect sizes when nested factors are fixed.
References
More filters
Book

Statistical Principles in Experimental Design

TL;DR: In this article, the authors introduce the principles of estimation and inference: means and variance, means and variations, and means and variance of estimators and inferors, and the analysis of factorial experiments having repeated measures on the same element.
Journal ArticleDOI

Statistical Principles in Experimental Design

TL;DR: This chapter discusses design and analysis of single-Factor Experiments: Completely Randomized Design and Factorial Experiments in which Some of the Interactions are Confounded.
Book

Design and Analysis - A Researcher's Handbook

TL;DR: Within-subject and mixed designs of Factorial Design have been studied in this article, where the Principal Two-Factor Within-Factor Effects and Simple Effects have been used to estimate the effect size and power of interaction components.
Journal ArticleDOI

The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.

TL;DR: The authors showed that the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy can be avoided by doing the right statistics, selecting the appropriate design, and sampling by systematic procedures, or by proceeding according to the so-called method of single cases.
Related Papers (5)