scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook

The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order

TLDR
Gusfield as mentioned in this paper argues that the "myth of the killer drunk" is a creation of the public culture of law and that the public law strengthens the illusion of moral consensus in American society and celebrates the virtues of a sober and orderly world.
Abstract
"Everyone knows 'drunk driving' is a 'serious' offense. And yet, everyone knows lots of 'drunk drivers' who don't get involved in accidents, don't get caught by the police, and manage to compensate adequately for their 'drunken disability.' Everyone also knows of 'drunk drivers' who have been arrested and gotten off easy. Gusfield's book dissects the conventional wisdom about 'drinking-driving' and examines the paradox of a 'serious' offense that is usually treated lightly by the judiciary and rarely carries social stigma."-Mac Marshall, "Social Science and Medicine" "A sophisticated and thoughtful critic. . . . Gusfield argues that the 'myth of the killer drunk' is a creation of the 'public culture of law.' . . . Through its dramatic development and condemnation of the anti-social character of the drinking-driver, the public law strengthens the illusion of moral consensus in American society and celebrates the virtues of a sober and orderly world."-James D. Orcutt, "Sociology and Social Research" "Joseph Gusfield denies neither the role of alcohol in highway accidents nor the need to do something about it. His point is that the research we conduct on drinking-driving and the laws we make to inhibit it tells us more about our moral order than about the effects of drinking-driving itself. Many will object to this conclusion, but none can ignore it. Indeed, the book will put many scientific and legal experts on the defensive as they face Gusfield's massive erudition, pointed analysis and criticism, and powerful argumentation. In The Culture of Public Problems, Gusfield presents the experts, and us, with a masterpiece of sociological reasoning."-Barry Schwartz, "American Journal of Sociology" This book is truly an outstanding achievement. . . . It is sociology of science, sociology of law, sociology of deviance, and sociology of knowledge. Sociologists generally should find the book of great theoretical interest, and it should stimulate personal reflection on their assumptions about science and the kind of consciousness it creates. They will also find that the book is a delight to read."-William B. Bankston, "Social Forces"

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Culture in action: symbols and strategies*

TL;DR: For example, the authors argues that culture influences action not by providing the ultimate values toward which action is oriented, but by shaping a repertoire or "tool kit" of habits, skills, and styles from which people construct "strategies of action."
Journal ArticleDOI

Medicalization and Social Control

Peter Conrad
- 01 Jan 1992 - 
TL;DR: The authors examines the major conceptual issues concerning medicalization and social control, emphasizing studies published on the topic since 1980, including the emergence, definition, contexts, process, degree, range, consequences, critiques, and future of medicalisation and demedicalization.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union

TL;DR: In this article, a sociological perspective is used to explain the enlargement of the European Community, in which enlargement is understood as the expansion of international community, and the bargaining process between Central and Eastern Europe and the European Union is viewed as an international discipline.
Journal ArticleDOI

Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity

TL;DR: In this article, a review of the literatures on countermovements and political opportunity is presented, arguing that this interaction increases when states enable but do not satisfy challengers, and presenting a general framework of theoretical propositions for understanding the interplay of movements and their opponents.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context

TL;DR: It is argued that a speech act view of security does not provide adequate grounding upon which to examine security practices in ‘real situations’, and three basic assumptions are put forward that an effective securitization is audience-centered, context-dependent and power-laden.