scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

The Devaluation of Women's Competence

Bernice Lott
- 01 Jan 1985 - 
- Vol. 41, Iss: 4, pp 43-60
TLDR
The authors found that the typical responses of men to a competent woman include prejudice, stereotyped beliefs, and overt or subtle discrimination, unless competing responses are evoked by other features of the situation or by the stimulus person's unique qualities.
Abstract
Research on the evaluation of competent women is reviewed in the context of the experiences of some eminent academic women with the objectives of bridging the distance between these two sources of data, and of identifying some of the conditions under which competent women are likely to be evaluated less favorably than comparable men. Findings generally support the hypothesis that the typical responses (of men, primarily) to a competent woman include prejudice, stereotyped beliefs, and overt or subtle discrimination, unless competing responses are evoked by other features of the situation or by the stimulus person's unique qualities. Thus, a competent woman is most likely to be devalued when judgments are elicited in realistic contexts in which there are potential consequences for the evaluator (e.g., a real employer) and when the woman is unfamiliar.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Interaction and the Conservation of Gender Inequality: Considering Employment

TL;DR: The authors argue that the persistence of gender hierarchy over transformations in its socioeconomic base lies in the mediation of gender inequality by taken-for-granted interactional processes that rewrite inequality into new institutional arrangements.
Journal ArticleDOI

Are People Prejudiced Against Women? Some Answers From Research on Attitudes, Gender Stereotypes, and Judgments of Competence

TL;DR: This paper found that attitudes toward women appear to be more positive than those toward men in samples of US and Canadian university students, and the evaluative content of the female stereotype is more favorable than the evaluation of the male stereotype, which is consistent with the generally more favorable evaluation of women than men obtained in attitude and stereotype studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Double Standards in the Evaluation of Men and Women

TL;DR: This paper investigated the emergence of such standards under several experimental conditions and investigated the extent to which the double standard is affected by the level of accountability for one's assessments, finding that women were held to a stricter standard of competence than men.
Journal ArticleDOI

Regarding Gender: Essentialism, Constructionism, and Feminist Psychology:

TL;DR: In this paper, two alternative understandings of gender, the essentialist and the constructionist, are discussed, and the implications of each of them for feminist psychology are discussed. But they are not discussed in detail.
Journal ArticleDOI

Student evaluations of college professors: When gender matters.

TL;DR: In this paper, student evaluations completed over a 4-year period at a private liberal arts college were analyzed for the effets of teacher gender, student gender, and divisional affiliation.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Are women prejudiced against women

Philip Goldberg
- 01 Apr 1968 - 
Journal ArticleDOI

Sex Effects on Evaluation

TL;DR: This article reviewed research on the evaluation of the qualifications and performance of men and women, and research on attributions about the causes of performance, and found that most studies show pro-male evaluation bias, contradictory evidence has also been found.
Journal ArticleDOI

Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness, and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant resumes.

TL;DR: In this paper, college students and professional interviewers rated and ranked bogus resumes on suitability for a managerial position on the basis of applicant sex, physical attractiveness, and scholastic standing.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as determinants of resumé evaluations.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluated 12 bogus job applicants for whom sex, physical attractiveness, and qualifications had been varied, with the first two variables (interviewer sex and attractiveness) constituting between-group factors, and the last three variables (applicant sex, attractiveness and qualifications), constituting repeated measures factors.
Related Papers (5)