scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The research and development costs of 68 randomly selected new drugs were obtained from a survey of 10 pharmaceutical firms and used to estimate the average pre-tax cost of new drug development.
About
This article is published in Journal of Health Economics.The article was published on 2003-03-01 and is currently open access. It has received 4135 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Fixed cost & Total cost.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates

TL;DR: The pharmaceutical industry faces considerable challenges, both politically and fiscally, and the fiscal pressures that face the industry from the perspective of R&D are dealt with.
Journal ArticleDOI

The present and future role of microfluidics in biomedical research

TL;DR: The progress made by lab-on-a-chip microtechnologies in recent years is analyzed, and the clinical and research areas in which they have made the greatest impact are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs

TL;DR: The research and development costs of 106 randomly selected new drugs were obtained from a survey of 10 pharmaceutical firms and used to estimate the average pre-tax cost of new drug and biologics development.
Journal ArticleDOI

Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Systems and Their Applications in Drug Discovery and Cell-Based Biosensors

TL;DR: The characteristics of 3D cell culture systems in comparison to the two-dimensional monolayer culture are discussed, focusing on cell growth conditions, cell proliferation, population, and gene and protein expression profiles.
Journal ArticleDOI

Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs.

TL;DR: The most comprehensive survey of clinical success rates across the drug industry to date shows productivity may be even lower than previous estimates.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Research and development costs for new drugs by therapeutic category. A study of the US pharmaceutical industry.

TL;DR: Development cost estimates by therapeutic category did not correlate strongly with US sales in the fifth year of marketing, but clinical development costs for Cardiovascular NCEs had much higher than average sales revenues but clinicaldevelopment costs for these drugs were only slightly above average.
Journal ArticleDOI

R&d Costs, Innovative Output and Firm Size in the Pharmaceutical Industry

TL;DR: The authors examined the relationship between firm size, R&D costs and output in the pharmaceutical industry and found that firms need to search for blockbuster drugs with above-average returns, particularly at the discovery and preclinical development phases.
Journal ArticleDOI

New Drug Innovation and Pharmaceutical Industry Structure: Trends in the Output of Pharmaceutical Firms:

TL;DR: Examination of pharmaceutical industry output, as measured by new chemical entity approvals in the United States since the 1962 Amendments to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938, indicates that innovation in the pharmaceutical industry is fairly widely dispersed and has become less concentrated over time.
Book

Competitive Strategies in the Pharmaceutical Industry

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore the pricing of pharmaceutical products in domestic and international markets, forces affecting competition in world markets, how competition affects risks to research and development, and the ways in which cost-effective research and information are used to promote pharmaceuticals.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (8)
Q1. What have the authors contributed in "The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs" ?

For example, DiMasi et al. this paper found that the average out-of-pocket cost per new drug is US $ 403 million ( 2000 dollars ). 

Can further improve their performance in terminating research early for compounds that will not make it to approval, then this will help lower out-of-pocket and capitalized costs. The growth rate for gross margins for recent years was also substantially lower than the growth rate for R & D outlays, leading to the suggestion that R & D growth rates could lessen in the future. The authors will examine costs by therapeutic category in future research. The R & D cost data for this study can be used in further analyses of R & D productivity at the firm level in future research. 

The categories “Toxicology and Safety Testing (4.5%),” Pharmaceutical Dosage Formulation and Stability Testing (7.3%),” “Regulatory: IND and NDA (4.1%),” “Bioavailability (1.8%),” and “Other (9.0%)” would each have to be decomposed into shares for pre-human R&D, pre-approval clinical period R&D, and post-approval R&D. 

In addition, the congressional debates on Medicare prescription drug coverage and various new state initiatives to fill gaps in coverage for the elderly and the uninsured have intensified the interest in the performance of the pharmaceutical industry. 

The growth rate in capitalized costs, however, is driven more by the fact that preclinical costs have a lower share of total out-of-pocket costs in the current study than in the previous studies, and time costs are necessarily proportionately more important for preclinical than for clinical expenditures. 

Once drug developers believe that they have enough evidence of safety and efficacy, they will compile the results of their testing in an application to regulatory authorities for marketing approval. 

In addition, the vast majority of the manufacturers with products that have received orphan drug designations are biotech firms or small niche pharmaceutical firms (see http://www.fda.gov/orphan/designat/list.htm). 

By all accounts, pharmaceutical firms have contracted out drug development activities at a rapidly growing rate over their study period, and the share of pharmaceutical R&D expenditures currently accounted for by outsourcing is substantial.