scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake

C. M. Lessells, +1 more
- 01 Jan 1987 - 
- Vol. 104, Iss: 1, pp 116-121
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The correct calculation of repeatability is outlined, a common mistake is pointed out, how the incorrectly calculated value relates to repeatable values is shown, and a method for checking published values and calculating approximate repeatability values from the F ratio is provided.
Abstract
-Repeatability is a useful tool for the population geneticist or genetical ecologist, but several papers have carried errors in its calculation We outline the correct calculation of repeatability, point out the common mistake, show how the incorrectly calculated value relates to repeatability, and provide a method for checking published values and calculating approximate repeatability values from the F ratio (mean squares among groups/ mean squares within groups) Received 6 February 1986, accepted 25 August 1986 REPEATABILITY is a measure used in quantitative genetics to describe the proportion of variance in a character that occurs among rather than within individuals Repeatability, r, is given by: r = (VG + VEg)/ VP, (1) where VG is the genotypic variance, VEg the general environmental variance, and Vp the phenotypic variance (Falconer 1960, 1981) In addition to its use in assessing the reliability of multiple measurements on the same individual, repeatability may be used to set an upper limit to the value of heritability (Falconer 1960, 1981) and to separate, for instance, the effects of "self" and "mate" on a character such as clutch size (van Noordwijk et al 1980) Repeatability is therefore a useful statistic for population geneticists and genetical ecologists Recently, we have noticed an increasing number of published papers and unpublished manuscripts in which repeatability was miscalculated Our purpose is fivefold: (1) to outline the correct method of calculating repeatability; (2) to point out a common mistake in calculating repeatability; (3) to show how much this mistake affects values of repeatability; (4) to provide a quick way of checking published estimates, and to calculate an approximate value of repeatability from published F ratios and degrees of freedom; and (5) to make recommendations for authors, referees, editors, and readers to prevent the promulgation and propagation of incorrect repeatability values in the literature CALCULATION OF REPEATABILITY Repeatability is the intraclass correlation coefficient (Sokal and Rohlf 1981), which is based on variance components derived from a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) The intraclass correlation coefficient is given by some statistical packages; otherwise it can be calculated from an ANOVA ANOVA is described in most statistics textbooks (eg Sokal and Rohlf 1981; Kirk 1968 gives a detailed treatment of more complex designs of ANOVA), so we will not repeat it here, but give the general form of the results from such an analysis in Table 1 Repeatability, r, is given by r = sA / (S + SA)' (2) where S2A is the among-groups variance component and s2 is the within-group variance component These variance components are calculated from the mean squares in the analysis of variance as:

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Evolution of animal genitalia: patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition dependence of genital and non-genital morphology in water strider (Heteroptera: Gerridae: Insecta)

TL;DR: While food stress during development had a large impact on adult morphology, and expression of genitalic traits exhibited significant levels of condition dependence, dierent genotypes did not significantly dier in their ability to cope with food stress.
Journal ArticleDOI

Seasonal and individual variation in response to GnRH challenge in male dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis)

TL;DR: This is the first demonstration of individual repeatability of short-term hormonal changes in a wild population of the dark-eyed junco, suggesting that hormonal plasticity might evolve in response to changing selection pressures.
Journal ArticleDOI

Outdoor immunology: methodological considerations for ecologists

TL;DR: The diversity of ways to measure immune function for ecologists is outlined, and some details on the limitations in interpretation of results are provided, to encourage thinking about immune function as a hierarchical defence model.
Journal ArticleDOI

Adrenocortical responses in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata): Individual variation, repeatability, and relationship to phenotypic quality

TL;DR: Sex differences in the extent and repeatability of inter-individual variation in adrenocortical responses and its relationship to sex-specific phenotypic quality, such as song duration and frequency and timing of egg laying are found.
Journal ArticleDOI

Negotiation over offspring care?—a positive response to partner-provisioning rate in great tits

TL;DR: An experimental increase in care by either male or female parent led to an increase (to a lesser extent) in the work rate of its partner, which is counter to the decrease predicted by partial compensation models.
References
More filters
Book

Introduction to quantitative genetics

TL;DR: The genetic constitution of a population: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and changes in gene frequency: migration mutation, changes of variance, and heritability are studied.
Book

Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences

Roger E. Kirk
TL;DR: This chapter discusses research strategies and the Control of Nuisance Variables, as well as randomly Randomized Factorial Design with Three or More Treatments and Randomized Block Factorial design, and Confounded Factorial Designs: Designs with Group-Interaction Confounding.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
What are the most common business strategies for heavy equipment distributors?

The provided paper does not mention anything about business strategies for heavy equipment distributors.