scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake

C. M. Lessells, +1 more
- 01 Jan 1987 - 
- Vol. 104, Iss: 1, pp 116-121
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The correct calculation of repeatability is outlined, a common mistake is pointed out, how the incorrectly calculated value relates to repeatable values is shown, and a method for checking published values and calculating approximate repeatability values from the F ratio is provided.
Abstract
-Repeatability is a useful tool for the population geneticist or genetical ecologist, but several papers have carried errors in its calculation We outline the correct calculation of repeatability, point out the common mistake, show how the incorrectly calculated value relates to repeatability, and provide a method for checking published values and calculating approximate repeatability values from the F ratio (mean squares among groups/ mean squares within groups) Received 6 February 1986, accepted 25 August 1986 REPEATABILITY is a measure used in quantitative genetics to describe the proportion of variance in a character that occurs among rather than within individuals Repeatability, r, is given by: r = (VG + VEg)/ VP, (1) where VG is the genotypic variance, VEg the general environmental variance, and Vp the phenotypic variance (Falconer 1960, 1981) In addition to its use in assessing the reliability of multiple measurements on the same individual, repeatability may be used to set an upper limit to the value of heritability (Falconer 1960, 1981) and to separate, for instance, the effects of "self" and "mate" on a character such as clutch size (van Noordwijk et al 1980) Repeatability is therefore a useful statistic for population geneticists and genetical ecologists Recently, we have noticed an increasing number of published papers and unpublished manuscripts in which repeatability was miscalculated Our purpose is fivefold: (1) to outline the correct method of calculating repeatability; (2) to point out a common mistake in calculating repeatability; (3) to show how much this mistake affects values of repeatability; (4) to provide a quick way of checking published estimates, and to calculate an approximate value of repeatability from published F ratios and degrees of freedom; and (5) to make recommendations for authors, referees, editors, and readers to prevent the promulgation and propagation of incorrect repeatability values in the literature CALCULATION OF REPEATABILITY Repeatability is the intraclass correlation coefficient (Sokal and Rohlf 1981), which is based on variance components derived from a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) The intraclass correlation coefficient is given by some statistical packages; otherwise it can be calculated from an ANOVA ANOVA is described in most statistics textbooks (eg Sokal and Rohlf 1981; Kirk 1968 gives a detailed treatment of more complex designs of ANOVA), so we will not repeat it here, but give the general form of the results from such an analysis in Table 1 Repeatability, r, is given by r = sA / (S + SA)' (2) where S2A is the among-groups variance component and s2 is the within-group variance component These variance components are calculated from the mean squares in the analysis of variance as:

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Adaptive significance of avian beak morphology for ectoparasite control

TL;DR: A feature of the beak specifically adapted for ectoparasite control is shown, significantly enhancing the efficiency of preening for parasite control in rock pigeons.
Journal ArticleDOI

Polygenic inheritance of a behavioral phenotype: interspecific genetics of song in the hawaiian cricket genus laupala.

TL;DR: The Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala (family Gryllidae) is one of several native genera of flightless crickets found in rain‐forest habitat across the Hawaiian archipelago, and the songs produced by adult males are acoustically distinct.
Journal ArticleDOI

Female choice for an indicator of male size in the song of the black-horned tree cricket, oecanthus nigricornis (orthoptera: gryllidae: oecanthinae)

TL;DR: It is shown that song is a reliable indicator of male size and male age, and that large male size is associated with increased female fecundity, and strong support is provided for the hypothesis that females use variation in calling song to assess male mate quality.
Journal ArticleDOI

Phenotypic flexibility of the avian gizzard: rapid, reversible and repeated changes of organ size in response to changes in dietary fibre content

TL;DR: Phenotypic responses of the gizzard of adult Japanese quail to experimental mismatches of load and capacity were tested by a series of diet-switching experiments, involving an increased content of non-digestable fibre (NDF) in the diet.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rejection of artificial cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) eggs in relation to variation in egg appearance among reed warblers (Acrocephalus scirpaceus)

TL;DR: The results are consistent with the evolutionary arms race hypothesis, but the intermediate rejection rate found in this population of reed warblers could also be maintained by an equilibrium between acceptors and rejecters due to rejection costs.
References
More filters
Book

Introduction to quantitative genetics

TL;DR: The genetic constitution of a population: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and changes in gene frequency: migration mutation, changes of variance, and heritability are studied.
Book

Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences

Roger E. Kirk
TL;DR: This chapter discusses research strategies and the Control of Nuisance Variables, as well as randomly Randomized Factorial Design with Three or More Treatments and Randomized Block Factorial design, and Confounded Factorial Designs: Designs with Group-Interaction Confounding.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
What are the most common business strategies for heavy equipment distributors?

The provided paper does not mention anything about business strategies for heavy equipment distributors.