scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Usability evaluation methods for the web: A systematic mapping study

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A systematic mapping study was performed to assess the UEMs that have been used by researchers to evaluate Web applications and their relation to the Web development process, which provided a framework in which new research activities can be more appropriately positioned and from which useful information for novice usability practitioners can be extracted.
Abstract
Context: In recent years, many usability evaluation methods (UEMs) have been employed to evaluate Web applications. However, many of these applications still do not meet most customers' usability expectations and many companies have folded as a result of not considering Web usability issues. No studies currently exist with regard to either the use of usability evaluation methods for the Web or the benefits they bring. Objective: The objective of this paper is to summarize the current knowledge that is available as regards the usability evaluation methods (UEMs) that have been employed to evaluate Web applications over the last 14years. Method: A systematic mapping study was performed to assess the UEMs that have been used by researchers to evaluate Web applications and their relation to the Web development process. Systematic mapping studies are useful for categorizing and summarizing the existing information concerning a research question in an unbiased manner. Results: The results show that around 39% of the papers reviewed reported the use of evaluation methods that had been specifically crafted for the Web. The results also show that the type of method most widely used was that of User Testing. The results identify several research gaps, such as the fact that around 90% of the studies applied evaluations during the implementation phase of the Web application development, which is the most costly phase in which to perform changes. A list of the UEMs that were found is also provided in order to guide novice usability practitioners. Conclusions: From an initial set of 2703 papers, a total of 206 research papers were selected for the mapping study. The results obtained allowed us to reach conclusions concerning the state-of-the-art of UEMs for evaluating Web applications. This allowed us to identify several research gaps, which subsequently provided us with a framework in which new research activities can be more appropriately positioned, and from which useful information for novice usability practitioners can be extracted.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A Content Analysis for Website Usefulness Evaluation: Utilizing Text Mining Technique

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluate the usefulness of company websites by presenting visualized outputs from a business perspective, allowing practitioners to easily understand the results of the website evaluation and use them in decision making.
Journal ArticleDOI

Social and Economic Contribution of 5G and Blockchain With Green Computing: Taxonomy, Challenges, and Opportunities

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyzed the advanced research on power consumption solutions for green BC-based 5G communication, Moreover, a taxonomy of 5G based on green BC and GC in various areas is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Manual versus automated qualitative usability assessment of interactive systems

TL;DR: It is investigated that most of the usability problems have been uncovered by the end‐users on academic websites that are not detected by tool, and there are several key features that these tools are failed to evaluate.
Journal ArticleDOI

Advancing open government data portals: a comparative usability evaluation study

TL;DR: A usability framework for OGD portals is proposed and its capability in recognizing usability problems and its causes is proved by carrying out a comparative heuristic evaluation in China.
Book ChapterDOI

Quality of Web Mashups: A Systematic Mapping Study

TL;DR: A systematic mapping study on which and how the quality of Web mashups has been addressed andHow the product quality-aware approaches have been defined and validated is reported.
References
More filters
Book

Statistical methods for rates and proportions

TL;DR: In this paper, the basic theory of Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) is used to detect a difference between two different proportions of a given proportion in a single proportion.
Journal ArticleDOI

Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions.

B. S. Everitt, +1 more
- 01 Sep 1973 - 
Book

Human-Computer Interaction

TL;DR: The human and the design of interactive systems: The myth of the infinitely fast machine, a guide to designing for diversity and the process of design.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering

TL;DR: This tutorial is designed to provide an introduction to the role, form and processes involved in performing Systematic Literature Reviews, and to gain the knowledge needed to conduct systematic reviews of their own.