scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Blekinge Institute of Technology

EducationKarlskrona, Sweden
About: Blekinge Institute of Technology is a education organization based out in Karlskrona, Sweden. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Software development & Context (language use). The organization has 1155 authors who have published 3868 publications receiving 77794 citations.


Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
26 Jun 2008
TL;DR: This work describes how to conduct a systematic mapping study in software engineering and provides guidelines for conducting systematic maps, and compares systematic maps with systematic reviews by systematically analyzing existing systematic reviews.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: A software engineering systematic map is a defined method to build a classification scheme and structure a software engineering field of interest. The analysis of results focuses on frequencies of publications for categories within the scheme. Thereby, the coverage of the research field can be determined. Different facets of the scheme can also be combined to answer more specific research questions. OBJECTIVE: We describe how to conduct a systematic mapping study in software engineering and provide guidelines. We also compare systematic maps and systematic reviews to clarify how to chose between them. This comparison leads to a set of guidelines for systematic maps. METHOD: We have defined a systematic mapping process and applied it to complete a systematic mapping study. Furthermore, we compare systematic maps with systematic reviews by systematically analyzing existing systematic reviews. RESULTS: We describe a process for software engineering systematic mapping studies and compare it to systematic reviews. Based on this, guidelines for conducting systematic maps are defined. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic maps and reviews are different in terms of goals, breadth, validity issues and implications. Thus, they should be used complementarily and require different methods (e.g., for analysis).

2,486 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
13 May 2014
TL;DR: It is concluded that using snowballing, as a first search strategy, may very well be a good alternative to the use of database searches.
Abstract: Background: Systematic literature studies have become common in software engineering, and hence it is important to understand how to conduct them efficiently and reliably.Objective: This paper presents guidelines for conducting literature reviews using a snowballing approach, and they are illustrated and evaluated by replicating a published systematic literature review.Method: The guidelines are based on the experience from conducting several systematic literature reviews and experimenting with different approaches.Results: The guidelines for using snowballing as a way to search for relevant literature was successfully applied to a systematic literature review.Conclusions: It is concluded that using snowballing, as a first search strategy, may very well be a good alternative to the use of database searches.

2,279 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There was a need to provide an update of how to conduct systematic mapping studies and how the guidelines should be updated based on the lessons learned from the existing systematic maps and SLR guidelines.
Abstract: Context Systematic mapping studies are used to structure a research area, while systematic reviews are focused on gathering and synthesizing evidence. The most recent guidelines for systematic mapping are from 2008. Since that time, many suggestions have been made of how to improve systematic literature reviews (SLRs). There is a need to evaluate how researchers conduct the process of systematic mapping and identify how the guidelines should be updated based on the lessons learned from the existing systematic maps and SLR guidelines. Objective To identify how the systematic mapping process is conducted (including search, study selection, analysis and presentation of data, etc.); to identify improvement potentials in conducting the systematic mapping process and updating the guidelines accordingly. Method We conducted a systematic mapping study of systematic maps, considering some practices of systematic review guidelines as well (in particular in relation to defining the search and to conduct a quality assessment). Results In a large number of studies multiple guidelines are used and combined, which leads to different ways in conducting mapping studies. The reason for combining guidelines was that they differed in the recommendations given. Conclusion The most frequently followed guidelines are not sufficient alone. Hence, there was a need to provide an update of how to conduct systematic mapping studies. New guidelines have been proposed consolidating existing findings.

1,598 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown numerically that vector antenna arrays can generate radio beams that exhibit spin and orbital angular momentum characteristics similar to those of helical Laguerre-Gauss laser beams in paraxial optics.
Abstract: We show numerically that vector antenna arrays can generate radio beams that exhibit spin and orbital angular momentum characteristics similar to those of helical Laguerre-Gauss laser beams in paraxial optics. For low frequencies (1 GHz), digital techniques can be used to coherently measure the instantaneous, local field vectors and to manipulate them in software. This enables new types of experiments that go beyond what is possible in optics. It allows information-rich radio astronomy and paves the way for novel wireless communication concepts.

903 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a set of 175 benchmark functions for unconstrained optimisation problems with diverse properties in terms of modality, separability, and valley landscape.
Abstract: Test functions are important to validate and compare the performance of optimisation algorithms. There have been many test or benchmark functions reported in the literature; however, there is no standard list or set of benchmark functions. Ideally, test functions should have diverse properties to be truly useful to test new algorithms in an unbiased way. For this purpose, we have reviewed and compiled a rich set of 175 benchmark functions for unconstrained optimisation problems with diverse properties in terms of modality, separability, and valley landscape. This is by far the most complete set of functions so far in the literature, and it can be expected that this complete set of functions can be used for validation of new optimisation in the future.

876 citations


Authors

Showing all 1172 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Martin Andersson7776833892
Maryann P. Feldman6221029262
Maged Elkashlan6129414736
Muhammad Usman61120324848
Trung Q. Duong6045712874
Claes Wohlin5623416886
Stefan Renvert521478420
Theo Notteboom5126110771
Lars Bengtsson473728621
Emilia Mendes452386699
Johan Richter442026875
Lennart E. Nacke4420713729
Mikael Nilsson422376467
Mats Viberg4123111749
Tony Gorschek411585504
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Nokia
28.3K papers, 695.7K citations

88% related

Tampere University of Technology
19.7K papers, 431.7K citations

88% related

Aalto University
32.6K papers, 829.6K citations

86% related

Ericsson
35.3K papers, 584.5K citations

85% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20236
202226
2021209
2020229
2019224
2018240