Use of a tourniquet in the internal fixation of fractures of the distal part of the fibula. A prospective, randomized trial.

TLDR: It is believed that it is justified not to use a tourniquet in the operative treatment of simple, isolated fibular fractures because of the lower prevalence of postoperative complications and the shorter time to recovery for the patients in Group 2.

Abstract: A prospective, randomized trial was undertaken to determine the rate of complications after the use of a tourniquet during open reduction and internal fixation of simple, closed fractures of the distal part of the fibula. Forty patients were operated on with use of a tourniquet (Group 1) and forty patients, without use of a tourniquet (Group 2). The average duration of the operation was significantly different between the two groups (41 +/- 9 minutes for Group 1 compared with 53 +/- 12 minutes for Group 2 [p = 0.026]). There were more complications in the patients in Group 1, two of whom had an isolated deep-vein thrombosis of the calf. The wound was possibly infected in eleven patients (seven in Group 1 and four in Group 2 [p < 0.05]) and frankly infected in three patients, all in Group 1 (p < 0.05). The plaster-of-Paris cast needed to be changed in three patients from Group 1. The patients in Group 1 returned to work an average of one week later than those in Group 2. The mean duration of follow-up was eighteen months (range, nine to thirty-two months). Given the lower prevalence of postoperative complications and the shorter time to recovery for the patients in Group 2, we believe that it is justified not to use a tourniquet in the operative treatment of simple, isolated fibular fractures.