Use of mobile apps and technologies in child and adolescent mental health: a systematic review
read more
Citations
The growing field of digital psychiatry: current evidence and the future of apps, social media, chatbots, and virtual reality.
An overview of and recommendations for more accessible digital mental health services
Acceptability and Utility of an Open-Access, Online Single-Session Intervention Platform for Adolescent Mental Health.
Digital tools for youth mental health.
Connected Mental Health: Systematic Mapping Study.
References
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1
Mobile App Rating Scale: A New Tool for Assessing the Quality of Health Mobile Apps
Mobile phone use and stress, sleep disturbances, and symptoms of depression among young adults - a prospective cohort study
Related Papers (5)
Digital Interventions to Support Population Mental Health in Canada During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Rapid Review.
Adolescent mental wellness: a systematic review protocol of instruments measuring general mental health and well-being.
Frequently Asked Questions (10)
Q2. What is the significant and impactful change to society in the last 50 years?
Mental Health6Arguably the most significant and impactful change to society in the last 50years has been the digital revolution, the introduction of digital technology and the Internet to all aspects of life; this includes interest in using them in the service of health; widely accepted applications already in use (Supplementary File 1: Digital Health Tool.
Q3. What is the main reason for the lack of a regulatory framework for h.apps?
Another important consideration is the language: 56% of the apps are only available in English[17], making use in an increasing multicultural society more difficult.
Q4. What is the surprising thing about the rise of digital health?
With the advent of smartphones, mobile telephones capable of computerfunctionality, digital health related content is in everyone’s pocket: 64.3% of the UK population owns a smartphone, with an even larger proportion regularly going online[12], so it is not surprising that the market of downloadable applications or “apps” has also embraced digital health content.
Q5. How old were the participants in the Jang et al. (2017) study?
81.4% of participants in the Jang et al. (2017) study were aged 10 to 29 years but no further breakdown of the groups composition in terms of ages was provided[34].
Q6. What does the author think of h.apps?
This suggests that h.apps are an acceptable resource and can be a useful vehicle for enhancing access to evidence-based monitoring and self-help.
Q7. What is the reason for the positive effects observed by Whittaker and Reid?
It may be that the effects observed by Whittaker[39] and Reid[37] are due to the usage of an app that makes adolescents think about their MH; this alone may have a positive effect as explained by Whittaker who notes that “the attention control was equally efficacious”[39].
Q8. What are the limitations of the review?
16In addition, confining the search to articles available in the English languagemay have limited the power of the review, particularly in the area of developing countries, applicability to low income countries being low.
Q9. What is the reason why the MEMO-CBT program was not included in the review?
For this review, a total of 6 articles met the inclusion criteria which arereflective of the fact that the study of mobile technologies in child and adolescent mental health is still in its relative infancy.
Q10. What is the way to provide a MH monitoring program?
The very act of engaging with MH monitoring may be beneficial for CYP and relatively inexpensive and user friendly apps may be the ideal mode to deliver that benefit in a cost-effective and efficient manner.