User-perceived quality of interactive systems
W. Dzida,S. Herda,W. D. Itzfeldt +2 more
- pp 188-195
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Categories are identified by factor analysis and represent a dimensional concept of the quality of interactive systems as perceived by its users, which describes essential user requirements.Abstract:
User-perceived quality of interactive systems is defined in terms of statistically non-overlapping categories, so-called dimensions or factors. Categories are identified by factor analysis and represent a dimensional concept of the quality of interactive systems as perceived by its users. Each category describes essential user requirements.This paper reports on a method and some initial results in the analysis of user-perceived quality of interactive systems. It is based on research work described in more detail elsewhere7.The methodology of approach is suitable for software requirements definition and human factors engineering.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
A framework for the development of decisoin support systems
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose a framework to explore the nature, scope, and content of the evolving topic of Decision Support Systems (DSS), and develop a descriptive model to access the performance objectives and the capabilities of a DSS as viewed by three of the major participants in their continued development and use.
Journal ArticleDOI
A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations
Martin Ivarsson,Tony Gorschek +1 more
TL;DR: The model is applied and validated in a comprehensive systematic literature review of evaluations of requirements engineering technologies published in software engineering journals and shows that the model can be applied to characterize evaluations in requirements engineering.
Journal ArticleDOI
Usability Assessment of Academic Digital Libraries: Effectiveness, Efficiency, Satisfaction, and Learnability
TL;DR: It is found in the study that there exists an interlocking relationship among effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction and operational criteria for effectiveness, Efficiency, satisfaction, and learnability.
Journal ArticleDOI
What makes users happy
Avi Rushinek,Sara F. Rushinek +1 more
TL;DR: The results of a user questionnaire are used to determine the effects of 17 different independent variables on user satisfaction.
References
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Quantitative evaluation of software quality
Barry Boehm,J. R. Brown,M. Lipow +2 more
TL;DR: The study reported in this paper provides for the first time a clear, well-defined framework for assessing the often slippery issues associated with software quality, via the consistent and mutually supportive sets of definitions, distinctions, guidelines, and experiences cited.
Journal ArticleDOI
Psychological complexity of computer programs: an experimental methodology
TL;DR: A series of experiments which have been conducted with the aim of establishing a suitable experimental methodology to measure those factors which make programs difficult to understand and maintain.
Journal ArticleDOI
On a Dilemma of Comparative Factor Analysis: A Study of Factor Matching Based on Random Data.
TL;DR: One of the most important, but still inadequately resolved issues pertinent to factor analytically oriented research is that of matching factors from two or more independent studies as mentioned in this paper, which has been severely limited by a lack of equally powerful rotational methods for establishing identity of concepts across a series of researches.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Quantitative measurement of program quality
TL;DR: In the absence of specific, applicable quantitative measurement tools there exists no means of defining the desired level of quality in a computer program, where quality is considered as something beyond correct program functioning, nor of ascertaining whether the desiredlevel has been achieved.