scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Vaccine alliance building blocks: a conjoint experiment on popular support for international COVID-19 cooperation formats.

TLDR
In this paper, the authors explored Germans' preferences for international COVID-19 vaccine alliance design principles and found that a larger alliance size and dominant EU-country composition increase alliance support.
Abstract
The design principles of institutions that visibly and significantly affect citizens’ lives are likely to be politically salient. Popular support for these principles is in turn crucial for institutional viability and effectiveness. Transboundary pandemics are a case in point. Understanding citizens’ preferences regarding the design of international alliances set up to mass-produce and distribute vaccines is likely to determine citizens’ subsequent cooperation with vaccination campaigns. This study explores Germans’ preferences for international COVID-19 vaccine alliance design principles. We conducted a conjoint experiment at a recurring cognitive moment in many pandemics’ cycles, between the initial outbreak and a more devastating but still-unknown second wave, when infection rates were very low, yet no policy solutions had been developed. We analyzed preferences regarding four building blocks: (1) alliance composition (size; EU-centrism), (2) alliance distribution rules (joining cost; vaccine allocation), (3) vaccine nationalism (cost per German household; coverage in Germany) and (4) vaccine producer confidence (origin; type). Distribution rules, political ideology and personal perceptions of pandemic threat matter little. But a larger alliance size and dominant EU-country composition increase alliance support. And vaccine nationalism is key: support increases with both lower costs and larger coverage for own-nation citizens. Moreover, support goes down for Chinese and American producers and increases for Swiss and especially own-nation producers. In sum, a realist and technocratic outlook is warranted at the cognitive stage in pandemic cycles when no solutions have been found, yet the worst already seems to be over, as national self-interest reigns supreme in popular attitudes.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A game theoretic approach identifies conditions that foster vaccine-rich to vaccine-poor country donation of surplus vaccines

TL;DR: In this article , the authors develop a game-theoretical approach to identify the vaccine donation strategy that is optimal for the vaccine-rich countries as a whole; and to determine whether the optimal strategy is stable (Nash equilibrium or self-enforcing agreement).
Journal ArticleDOI

How should COVID-19 vaccines be distributed between the Global North and South: a discrete choice experiment in six European countries

- 18 Oct 2022 - 
TL;DR: This paper examined public preferences in six European countries regarding the allocation of COVID-19 vaccines between the Global South and Global North and found that female, younger, and more educated respondents were more favorable to an equitable vaccine distribution.
Posted ContentDOI

How should COVID-19 vaccines be distributed between the Global North and South: a discrete choice experiment in six European countries

TL;DR: Public preferences in six European countries regarding the allocation of COVID-19 vaccines between the Global South and Global North are examined, showing female, younger, and more educated respondents were more favourable of an equitable vaccine distribution.
Journal ArticleDOI

Prioritization preferences for COVID-19 vaccination are consistent across five countries

TL;DR: This article found that public preferences are consistent with expert guidelines prioritizing health-care workers and people with medical preconditions, however, the public also considers those signing up early for vaccination and citizens of the country to be more deserving than later-comers and non-citizens.
Journal ArticleDOI

Correlates of support for international vaccine solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional survey evidence from Germany

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors examined the levels and predictors of international vaccine solidarity and found that respondents higher in cosmopolitanism and empathy exhibit more support for international dose-sharing.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

An economic theory of clubs

James M. Buchanan
- 01 Feb 1965 - 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors develop a general theory of clubs, or consumption ownership-membership arrangements, a theory that will include as a variable to be determined the extension of ownershipconsumption rights over differing numbers of persons.
ReportDOI

Investor Diversification and International Equity Markets

TL;DR: The authors used a simple model of investor preferences and behavior to show that current portfolio patterns imply that investors in each nation expect returns in their domestic equity market to be several hundred basis points higher than returns in other markets.
Journal ArticleDOI

Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson

TL;DR: In this article, four variables are used as predictors of a President's popularity: length of time in office, international events, economic slump, and war, and the number of voters who approve or disapprove of the way the incumbent is handling his job as president.
Journal ArticleDOI

Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments

TL;DR: This paper proposed a new causal estimand and showed that it can be nonparametrically identified and easily estimated from conjoint data using a fully randomized design, and then demonstrate the value of these techniques through empirical applications to voter decision making and attitudes toward immigrants.
Journal ArticleDOI

Which Is the Fairest One of All? A Positive Analysis of Justice Theories

TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluate various positive and normative theories of justice in terms of how accurately they describe the impartial fairness preferences of real people, and they propose and defend an integrated justice theory based on preferences over four distinct and sometimes conflicting forces.
Related Papers (5)