scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar

Judit Bar-Ilan
- 01 Feb 2008 - 
- Vol. 74, Iss: 2, pp 257-271
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This paper compares the h-indices of a list of highly-cited Israeli researchers based on citations counts retrieved from the Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar respectively with results obtained through Google Scholar.
Abstract
This paper compares the h-indices of a list of highly-cited Israeli researchers based on citations counts retrieved from the Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar respectively. In several case the results obtained through Google Scholar are considerably different from the results based on the Web of Science and Scopus. Data cleansing is discussed extensively.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis

TL;DR: This paper proposes a unique open-source tool, designed by the authors, called bibliometrix, for performing comprehensive science mapping analysis, programmed in R, and can be rapidly upgraded and integrated with other statistical R-packages.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics

TL;DR: Zehn Grundsatze um Forschung zu bewerten, drangen Diana Hicks, Paul Wouters und Kollegen einiges zusammen wirkt.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases

TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared the performance of Web of Science and Scopus and provided a comprehensive comparison of these two databases to answer frequent questions which researchers ask, such as: How web of science and scopus are different? In which aspects these two database are similar? Or, if the researchers are forced to choose one of them, which one should they prefer?
Journal ArticleDOI

The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index

TL;DR: It is problematic that SCI has been used and is used as the dominant source for science indicators based on publication and citation numbers, because the declining coverage of the citation databases problematizes the use of this source.
Journal ArticleDOI

A review of the literature on citation impact indicators

TL;DR: In this paper, an in-depth review of the literature on citation impact indicators is provided, focusing on the selection of publications and citations to be included in the calculation of citation impact indicator.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output

TL;DR: The index h, defined as the number of papers with citation number ≥h, is proposed as a useful index to characterize the scientific output of a researcher.
Journal ArticleDOI

Theory and practise of the g-index

TL;DR: It is shown that the g-index inherits all the good properties of the h-index and better takes into account the citation scores of the top articles and yields a better distinction between and order of the scientists from the point of view of visibility.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Hirsch-type index for journals

TL;DR: It is suggested that a h-type index - equal to h if you have published h papers, each of which has at least h citations - would be a useful supplement to journal impact factors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present characteristics of the statistical correlation between the Hirsch (h-) index and several standard bibliometric indicators, as well as with the results of peer review judgment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science

TL;DR: The data indicate that the question of which tool provides the most complete set of citing literature may depend on the subject and publication year of a given article, and that any one of these three resources as the answer to all citation tracking needs is not identified.
Related Papers (5)