scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers on "Lumbar vertebrae published in 2018"



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Open lumbar microdiscectomy still showed good clinical results, and it is reckoned that a randomized controlled trial with a large sample size would be required in the future to compare these two surgical methods.
Abstract: Background. Among the surgical methods for lumbar disc herniation, open lumbar microdiscectomy is considered the gold standard. Recently, percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy is also commonly performed for lumbar disc herniation for its various strong points. Objectives. The present study aims to examine whether percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy show better results as surgical treatments for lumbar disc herniation in the Korean population. Methods. In the present meta-analysis, papers on Korean patients who underwent open lumbar microdiscectomy and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy were searched, both of which are surgical methods to treat lumbar disc herniation. The papers from 1973, when percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy was first introduced, to March 2018 were searched at the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library. Results. Seven papers with 1254 patients were selected. A comparison study revealed that percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy had significantly better results than open lumbar microdiscectomy in the visual analogue pain scale at the final follow-up (leg: mean difference [MD]=-0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI]=-0.61, -0.09; p=0.009; back: MD=-0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]=-1.42, -0.17; p=0.01), Oswestry Disability Index (MD=-2.12; 95% CI=-4.25, 0.01; p=0.05), operation time (MD=-23.06; 95% CI=-32.42, -13.70; p<0.00001), and hospital stay (MD=-4.64; 95% CI=-6.37, -2.90; p<0.00001). There were no statistical differences in the MacNab classification (odds ratio [OR]=1.02; 95% CI=0.71, 1.49; p=0.90), complication rate (OR=0.72; 95% CI=0.20, 2.62; p=0.62), recurrence rate (OR=0.83; 95% CI=0.50, 1.38; p=0.47), and reoperation rate (OR=1.45; 95% CI=0.89, 2.35; p=0.13). Limitations. All 7 papers used for the meta-analysis were non-RCTs. Some differences (type of surgery (primary or revisional), treatment options before the operation, follow-up period, etc.) existed depending on the selected paper, and the sample size was small as well. Conclusion. While percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy showed better results than open lumbar microdiscectomy in some items, open lumbar microdiscectomy still showed good clinical results, and it is therefore reckoned that a randomized controlled trial with a large sample size would be required in the future to compare these two surgical methods.

80 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Low-quality evidence suggested that surgical treatment is more effective than non-operative treatment in improving physical functions; no significant difference was observed in adverse events.
Abstract: Objective:To investigate the effects of surgical versus non-operative treatment on the physical function and safety of patients with lumbar disc herniation.Data sources:PubMed, Cochrane Library, Em...

65 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: PELD can now be considered an alternative to microscopic lumbar discectomy (MLD) in the treatment of all kinds of disc herniations with the added benefits of keyhole surgery even for severely difficult and extremely difficult LDH cases.
Abstract: BACKGROUND Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is being treated with limited indication by percutaneous full endoscopic lumbar discectomy. However, microscopic lumbar discectomy (MLD) is still considered as a gold standard. OBJECTIVE With the advances in spinal endoscopic instruments and surgical techniques, all LDHs have now become operable with percutaneous full endoscopic lumbar discectomy procedure. We report the results of percutaneous full endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) for all patients diagnosed with LDH, including severely difficult and extremely difficult LDH cases who visited our clinic with leg pain and lower back pain. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective study of consecutive prospective patients. SETTING Spine center, Nanoori Suwon Hospital, Suwon, Korea. METHODS Electronic medical records of 98 consecutive patients (104 levels) who underwent surgery from October 2015 to May 2016, by PELD for different LDHs either by percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy (PETLD) or percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy (PEILD) approach were reviewed retrospectively. The L5-S1 level was accessed with PEILD approach and the other levels were accessed with PETLD approach. Outcomes were analyzed utilizing the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Mac Nab Criteria and endoscopic surgical success grade/score. RESULTS There were 75 (72.1%) men and 29 (27.9%) women patients with a mean age of 48.12 ± 15.88 years. Follow-up range from a minimum of 10 to 15 months (mean 12.77 ± 1.84 months). Most of the LDHs were located at L4-5 level. There were 76% severely difficult and extremely difficult cases. PETLD was the choice of approach in most of the cases (78 cases, 75%). VAS decreased significantly. ODI improved from preoperative 54.67 ± 7.52 to 24.50 ± 6.45 at last follow-up. 96.1% good to excellent result was obtained as per Mac Nab criteria. 98.1% of patients were managed with a successful to completely successful grade according to the endoscopic surgical success grading/scoring. Two cases (1.9%) developed transient motor weakness. LIMITATION Retrospective analysis of consecutive prospective patients. CONCLUSION With more than 96% success (98.1% as per endoscopic success grading/scoring) all kinds of LDHs, including severely difficult and extremely difficult LDHs, are accessible by the PELD (PETLD and PEILD) technique. PELD can now be considered an alternative to microscopic lumbar discectomy (MLD) in the treatment of all kinds of disc herniations with the added benefits of keyhole surgery even for severely difficult and extremely difficult LDH cases. KEY WORDS Lumbar disc herniation (LDH), percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD), percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy (PETLD), percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEILD), evolution of PELD, difficult LDH, highly migrated LDH, high canal compromised LDH, revision LDH, LDH with discal cyst, calcified LDH.

62 citations


Journal Article
TL;DR: Although lumbar trabecular HU T-scores are lower than DXA T- Scores, thresholds can be selected to achieve high sensitivity and specificity when screening for osteoporosis.
Abstract: Background Clinical computed tomography (CT) studies performed for other indications can be used to opportunistically assess vertebral bone without additional radiation or cost. Reference values for young women are needed to evaluate diagnostic accuracy and track changes in CT bone mineral density values across the lifespan. The purpose of this study was to determine reference values for lumbar trabecular CT attenuation (Hounsfield units [HU]) and determine the diagnostic accuracy of HU T-scores (T-scoreHU) for identifying individuals with osteoporosis. Methods We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study of patients undergoing CT of the lumbar spine. Reference values for lumbar spine Hounsfield units were determined from a reference sample of 190 young women aged 20-30 years undergoing CT scan of the lumbar spine. A separate sample of 252 older subjects undergoing CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) within a 6-month period that served as a validation cohort. Osteoporosis was defined by T-scoreDXA ≤ -2.5. Reference values were determined for lumbar HU from L1 to L4 from the reference cohort (24.0 ± 2.9 years). T-scoreHU was calculated in the validation cohort (58.9 ± 7.5 yrs). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess sensitivity and specificity of T-scoreHU for this task. Results Reference group HU ranged from 227 ± 42 at L3 to 236 ± 42 at L1 (P < 0.001). Validation group T-scoreDXA was -0.7 ± 1.5 and -0.9 ± 1.2 at lumbar and femoral sites respectively. Mean T-scoreHU was -2.3. T-scoreHU of -3.0, corresponding to 110 HU, was 48% sensitive and 91% specific for osteoporosis in the validation group. ROC area under the curve ranged from 0.825 to 0.853 depending on lumbar level assessed. Conclusions Although lumbar trabecular HU T-scores are lower than DXA T-scores, thresholds can be selected to achieve high sensitivity and specificity when screening for osteoporosis. Patients with a lumbar T-scoreHU ≤ -3.0 should be referred for additional evaluation. Further research into HU T-scores and clinical correlates may also provide a tool to assess changes in vertebral bone and the relationship to fracture risk across the lifespan.

57 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Feb 2018-Spine
TL;DR: It is identified that obesity, advanced American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and longer operative time were predictive of postoperative SSI, and increased age, female sex, serum creatinine more than 1.5 mg/dL, and prolonged operative duration are associated with non-SSI infectious complications after SLLF.
Abstract: Study Design.Retrospective multivariate analysis of a prospectively collected, multicenter database.Objective.To identify patient characteristics and perioperative risk factors associated with postoperative infectious complications after single-level lumbar fusion (SLLF) surgery.Summary of Backgroun

56 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Satisfactory radiographic outcomes can be achieved similarly and adequately with these 3 surgical approaches for patients with ASD with mild to moderate sagittal deformity.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE Surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD) is an effective endeavor that can be accomplished using a variety of surgical strategies. Here, the authors assess and compare radiographic data, complications, and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcome scores among patients with ASD who underwent a posterior spinal fixation (PSF)-only approach, a posterior approach combined with lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF+PSF), or a posterior approach combined with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF+PSF). METHODS The medical records of consecutive adults who underwent thoracolumbar fusion for ASD between 2003 and 2013 at a single institution were reviewed. Included were patients who underwent instrumentation from the pelvis to L-1 or above, had a sagittal vertical axis (SVA) of 10°, a pelvic tilt of > 20°, a lumbar Cobb angle of > 20°, and a thoracic Cobb angle of > 15°. Preoperative SVA, LL, pelvic incidence-LL mismatch, and lumbar and thoracic Cobb angles were similar among the groups. Patients in the PSF-only group had more comorbidities, those in the ALIF+PSF group were, on average, younger and had a lower body mass index than those in the LLIF+PSF group, and patients in the LLIF+PSF group had a significantly higher mean number of interbody fusion levels than those in the ALIF+PSF and PSF-only groups. At final follow-up, all radiographic parameters and the mean numbers of complications were similar among the groups. Patients in the LLIF+PSF group had proximal junctional kyphosis that required revision surgery significantly less often and fewer proximal junctional fractures and vertebral slips. All preoperative HRQoL scores were similar among the groups. After surgery, the LLIF+PSF group had a significantly lower ODI score, higher SRS-22 self-image/total scores, and greater achievement of the minimal clinically important difference for the SRS-22 pain score. CONCLUSIONS Satisfactory radiographic outcomes can be achieved similarly and adequately with these 3 surgical approaches for patients with ASD with mild to moderate sagittal deformity. Compared with patients treated with an ALIF+PSF or PSF-only surgical strategy, patients who underwent LLIF+PSF had lower rates of proximal junctional kyphosis and mechanical failure at the upper instrumented vertebra and less back pain, less disability, and better SRS-22 scores.

56 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Nov 2018-Spine
TL;DR: Being male, young age, current smoking, currentsmoking, higher BMI, herniation type, DUI, FO, FT, and from showed a significant correlation with the incidence of rLDH and patients with these risk factors should be paid more attention for prevention of recurrence after primary surgery.
Abstract: Study Design.Retrospective clinical series.Objective.To investigate the clinical features and the risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH) in China.Summary of Background Data.rLDH is a common cause of poor outcomes after lumbar microdiscectomy surgery. Risk factors for rLDH are incre

52 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In lumbar interbody fusion, MIS-TLIF had better ODI, VAS pain, and complication rate when compared to LLIF with direct and indirect meta-analysis methods, however, in terms of fusion rates, there were no differences between the two techniques.
Abstract: The surgical procedures used for arthrodesis in the lumbar spine for degenerative lumbar diseases remain controversial. This systematic review aims to assess and compare clinical outcomes along with the complications and fusion of each technique (minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) or minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (MIS LLIF)) for treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases. Relevant studies were identified from Medline and Scopus from inception to July 19, 2016 that reported Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), back and leg pain visual analog score (VAS), postoperative complications, and fusion of either technique. Fifty-eight studies were included for the analysis of MIS-TLIF; 40 studies were included for analysis of LLIF, and 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) study was included for comparison of MIS-TLIF to LLIF. Overall, there were 9506 patients (5728 in the MIS-TLIF group and 3778 in the LLIF group). Indirect meta-analysis, MIS-TLIF provided better postoperative back and leg pain (VAS), disabilities (ODI), and risk of having complications when compared to LLIF technique, but the fusion rate was not significantly different between the two techniques. However, direct meta-analysis between RCT study and pooled indirect meta-analysis of MIS-TLIF have better pain, disabilities, and complication but no statistically significant difference when compared to LLIF. In LLIF, the pooled mean ODI and VAS back pain were 2.91 (95% CI 2.49, 3.33) and 23.24 (95% CI 18.96, 27.51) in MIS approach whereas 3.14 (95% CI 2.29, 4.04) and 28.29 (95% CI 21.92, 34.67) in traditional approach. In terms of complications and fusion rate, there was no difference in both groups. In lumbar interbody fusion, MIS-TLIF had better ODI, VAS pain, and complication rate when compared to LLIF with direct and indirect meta-analysis methods. However, in terms of fusion rates, there were no differences between the two techniques.

43 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results of this study are intended to guide clinical practice and future lumbar total disk replacement device choice and design.

38 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Cortical bone trajectory screws would provide similar outcomes compared to pedicle screws in posterior lumbar interbody fusion at one year after surgery, and this technique represents a reasonable alternative topedicle screws.
Abstract: Introduction. A prospective comparative study between classical posterior interbody fusion with peduncular screws and the new technique with divergent cortical screws was conducted. Material and Methods. Only patients with monosegmental degenerative disease were recruited into this study. We analyzed a cohort of 40 patients treated from January 2015 to March 2016 divided into 2 groups (20 patients went to traditional open surgery and 20 patients under mini-invasive strategy). Primary endpoints of this study are fusion rate and muscular damage; secondary endpoints analyzed were three different clinical scores (ODI, VAS, and EQ) and the morbidity rate of both techniques. Results. There was no significant difference in fusion rate between the two techniques. In addition, a significant difference in muscular damage was found according to the MRI evaluation. Clinical outcomes, based on pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index status, and Euroquality-5D score, were found to be also statistically different, even one year after surgery. This study also demonstrated a correlation between patients’ muscular damage and their clinical outcome. Conclusions. Cortical bone trajectory screws would provide similar outcomes compared to pedicle screws in posterior lumbar interbody fusion at one year after surgery, and this technique represents a reasonable alternative to pedicle screws.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: CBT screws had better biomechanical fixation in osteoporotic lumbar spine compared with standard pedicles, and showed better resistance to fatigue testing and required more cycles to exceed 5 mm.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The two methods of defining lumbar spine muscle ROIs demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability, although significant differences exist as method 1 showed larger CSA and FSF values compared to method 2.
Abstract: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is commonly used to assess the health of the lumbar spine and supporting structures. Studies have suggested that fatty infiltration of the posterior lumbar muscles is important in predicting responses to treatment for low back pain. However, methodological differences exist in defining the region of interest (ROI) of a muscle, which limits the ability to compare data between studies. The purpose of this study was to determine reliability and systematic differences within and between two commonly utilized methodologies for ROI definitions of lumbar paraspinal muscle. T2-weighted MRIs of the mid-L4 vertebrae from 37 patients with low back pain who were scheduled for lumbar spine surgery were included from a hospital database. Fatty infiltration for these patients ranged from low to high, based on Kjaer criteria. Two methods were used to define ROI: 1) segmentation of the multifidus and erector spinae based on fascial planes including epimuscular fat, and 2) segmentation of the multifidus and erector spinae based on visible muscle boundaries, which did not include epimuscular fat. Total cross sectional area (tCSA), fat signal fraction (FSF), muscle cross sectional area, and fat cross sectional area were measured. Degree of agreement between raters for each parameter was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and area fraction of overlapping voxels. Excellent inter-rater agreement (ICC > 0.75) was observed for all measures for both methods. There was no significant difference between area fraction overlap of ROIs between methods. Method 1 demonstrated a greater tCSA for both the erector spinae (14–15%, p < 0.001) and multifidus (4%, p < 0.016) but a greater FSF only for the erector spinae (11–13%, p < 0.001). The two methods of defining lumbar spine muscle ROIs demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability, although significant differences exist as method 1 showed larger CSA and FSF values compared to method 2. The results of this study confirm the validity of using either method to measure lumbar paraspinal musculature, and that method should be selected based on the primary outcome variables of interest.


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Vertebral augmentation can sufficiently reduce von Mises stresses at different heights of OVCFs of the vertebral body, although this technique does not completely restore vertebral height to the anatomical criteria.
Abstract: Clinical results have shown that different vertebral heights have been restored post-augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) and the treatment results are consistent. However, no significant results regarding biomechanical effects post-augmentation have been found with different types of vertebral deformity or vertebral heights by biomechanical analysis. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the biomechanical effects between different vertebral heights of OVCFs before and after augmentation using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Four patients with OVCFs of T12 underwent computed tomography (CT) of the T11-L1 levels. The CT images were reconstructed as simulated three-dimensional finite-element models of the T11-L1 levels (before and after the T12 vertebra was augmented with cement). Four different kinds of vertebral height models included Genant semi-quantitative grades 0, 1, 2, and 3, which simulated unilateral augmentation. These models were assumed to represent vertical compression and flexion, left flexion, and right flexion loads, and the von Mises stresses of the T12 vertebral body were assessed under different vertebral heights before and after bone cement augmentation. Data showed that the von Mises stresses significantly increased under four loads of OVCFs of the T12 vertebral body before the operation from grade 0 to grade 3 vertebral heights. The maximum stress of grade 3 vertebral height pre-augmentation was produced at approximately 200%, and at more than 200% for grade 0. The von Mises stresses were significantly different between different vertebral heights preoperatively. The von Mises stresses of the T12 vertebral body significantly decreased in four different loads and at different vertebral body heights (grades 0–3) after augmentation. There was no significant difference between the von Mises stresses of grade 0, 1, and 3 vertebral heights postoperatively. The von Mises stress significantly decreased between pre-augmentation and post-augmentation in T12 OVCF models of grade 0–3 vertebral heights. Vertebral augmentation can sufficiently reduce von Mises stresses at different heights of OVCFs of the vertebral body, although this technique does not completely restore vertebral height to the anatomical criteria.

Book ChapterDOI
16 Sep 2018
TL;DR: This framework is able to generate unified radiological reports, which reveals its effectiveness and potential as a clinical tool to relieve spinal radiologists from laborious workloads to a certain extent, such that contributes to relevant time savings and expedites the initiation of many specific therapies.
Abstract: The objective of this work is to automatically generate unified reports of lumbar spinal MRIs in the field of radiology, i.e., given an MRI of a lumbar spine, directly generate a radiologist-level report to support clinical decision making. We show that this can be achieved via a weakly supervised framework that combines deep learning and symbolic program synthesis theory to overcome four inevitable tasks: semantic segmentation, radiological classification, positional labeling, and structural captioning. The weakly supervised framework using object level annotations without requiring radiologist-level report annotations to generate unified reports. Each generated report covers almost type lumbar structures comprised of six intervertebral discs, six neural foramina, and five lumbar vertebrae. The contents of each report contain the exact locations and pathological correlations of these lumbar structures as well as their normalities in terms of three type relevant spinal diseases: intervertebral disc degeneration, neural foraminal stenosis, and lumbar vertebrae deformities. This framework is applied to a large corpus of T1/T2-weighted sagittal MRIs of 253 subjects acquired from multiple vendors. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the framework is able to generate unified radiological reports, which reveals its effectiveness and potential as a clinical tool to relieve spinal radiologists from laborious workloads to a certain extent, such that contributes to relevant time savings and expedites the initiation of many specific therapies.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that low BMI, loosening of posterior instrumentation, and pear-shaped disc were associated with cage retropulsion after lumbar interbody fusion, particularly in non-obese patients.
Abstract: Study Design A retrospective clinical case series. Purpose To determine the strength of association between cage retropulsion and its related factors. Overview of Literature Lumbar interbody fusion with cage can obtain a firm union and can restore the disc height with normal sagittal and coronal alignment. Although lumbar interbody fusion procedures have satisfactory clinical outcomes, peri- and postoperative complications regarding the cage remain challenging. Methods From January 2006 to June 2016, 1,047 patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal interbody fusion at Gyeongsang National University Hospital were enrolled. Medical records and pre- and postoperative radiographs were reviewed to identify significant cage retropulsion-related factors. The associations between cage retropulsion with various risk factors were evaluated by calculating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using multiple logistic regression analysis. Results Of 1,229 disc levels, 16 cases (1.3%, 10 men and 6 women) had cage retropulsion. Univariate analysis revealed no significant differences between the cage retropulsion group and the no cage retropulsion group with regard to demographic data such as age, sex, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), smoking habits, presence of osteoporosis, and duration of follow-up. Multivariate analysis revealed that low BMI (OR, 0.875; 95% CI, 0.771-0.994; p=0.040), presence of screw loosening (OR, 27.400; 95% CI, 7.818-96.033; p<0.001), and pear-shaped disc (OR, 9.158; 95% CI, 2.455-34.160; p=0.001) were significantly associated with cage retropulsion. Conclusions This study demonstrated that low BMI, loosening of posterior instrumentation, and pear-shaped disc were associated with cage retropulsion after lumbar interbody fusion. Therefore, when performing lumbar interbody fusion with a cage, surgeons should have skillful surgical techniques for firm fixation to prevent cage retropulsion, particularly in non-obese patients.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An oblique retroperitoneal approach is very safe, allowing reproducible access from L1 to S1 for lumbar interbody fusion in adult spinal deformity and evaluate the radiographical findings and clinical outcomes of patients treated using this technique.
Abstract: In recent years, with advancements in surgical techniques and instrumentation, the lateral lumbar interbody fusion is being used increasingly as an alternative procedure to anterior approach. In this study, we illustrated a oblique retroperitoneal approach for lumbar interbody fusion with one incision site and tilting of the operation table in adult spinal deformity and evaluate the radiographical findings and clinical outcomes of patients treated using this technique. This study included 32 patients scheduled to undergo anterior and posterior long-level fusions for lumbar degenerative kyphosis or degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Data collected included blood loss, operative time, incision size, and perioperative complications. Pre- and postoperative radiographic parameters and clinical outcome measures were assessed. Mean follow-up time was 26.1 months. The mean blood losses were 107.4 and 102.4 ml, and the mean operative times were 116, 97, and 82 min for the patients within five levels (4 cases), four levels (18 cases), and three levels (10 cases). The mean incision sizes were 14.63, 13.82, and 12.5 cm in the patients with five, four, and three levels. The mean pelvic incidence was 50.3°. The mean preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA) was + 13.66 cm, and the last follow-up SVA was + 2.94 cm. The preoperative lumbar lordosis (LL) was 5.79°, and the last follow-up LL was 46.54°. The mean correction angle was 41°. The mean Cobb angle decreased from a preoperative value of 21.55° to 9.6°at the last follow-up. An oblique retroperitoneal approach is very safe, allowing reproducible access from L1 to S1 for lumbar interbody fusion in adult spinal deformity.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Radiotherapy was a safe and effective treatment choice for aggressive vertebral hemangioma, but in case with severe spinal cord compression and neurological deficit, surgical intervention was required.
Abstract: BACKGROUND Vertebral hemangioma is usually a benign and asymptomatic tumor of blood vessels, but can be aggressive (symptomatic) with expansion, pain, and spinal cord compression. The aim of this study was to review the effects of radiotherapy, surgery, and other treatment approaches in patients with aggressive vertebral hemangioma. MATERIAL AND METHODS Retrospective clinical review included 20 patients who underwent radiotherapy as their first-line treatment for aggressive vertebral hemangioma with mild or slowly developing neurological deficit. External radiation was divided into 20-25 fractions with a total dose of 40-50 Gy. Minimum clinical follow-up after treatment was 20 months. RESULTS The 20 patients included eight men and 12 women (mean age, 46.6 years), with aggressive vertebral hemangioma located in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar vertebrae in four, 14, and two patients, respectively. Following radiotherapy treatment, 65.0% of patients (13/20) were symptom-free, without recurrence or malignant transformation at the time of last clinical follow-up (average, 75.2 months). Due to minor post-radiation vertebral re-ossification, two of the 13 patients who were initially symptom-free after radiotherapy requested percutaneous vertebroplasty. A further seven patients required surgery after radiotherapy, due to increasing neurological deficit in three patients, and persistent neurological deficit in four patients. At the last follow-up (average, 63.6 months), six patients were symptom-free, and one patient still had slight residual symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Radiotherapy was a safe and effective treatment choice for aggressive vertebral hemangioma, but in case with severe spinal cord compression and neurological deficit, surgical intervention was required.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Genant’s semiquantitative assessment is a simple and effective method for detecting vertebral fracture and 66.8% of patients with vertebral fractures found in this study were undiagnosed in the original radiology reports.
Abstract: Vertebral fracture is the most common fragility fracture but it remains frequently unrecognized and is underdiagnosed worldwide. In this retrospective study, we examined the prevalence of moderate and severe vertebral fractures on chest radiographs of hospitalized female patients aged 50 years and older and determined missed diagnosis of vertebral fractures in the original radiology reports. 3216 female patients 50 years of age and older were enrolled in our study. The patients’ medical records including their original radiology reports and lateral chest radiographs were retrospectively reviewed by the study radiologists who had training certificates from the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD). Vertebral fractures between thoracic spine T4 and lumbar spine L1 were identified and classified using Genant’s semi-quantitative scale. The definition of vertebral fractures used in this study was Genant grade 2 or higher. The study radiologists identified 295(9.2%) patients with grade 2 or 3 fractured vertebrae, total 444 vertebrae on 3216 chest radiographs. The prevalence of vertebral fracture was 2.4% in women aged 50-59 yrs., 8.9% in women aged 60–69 yrs., and 21.9% in women aged≥70 yrs. There were 213 patients with a single vertebral fracture, 49 patients with two vertebral fractures and 33 patients with ≥ three vertebral fractures. Fractured vertebrae were identified with greater frequency in thoracic spine T11,12 and lumbar spine L1. According to our statistics, 66.8% of patients with vertebral fractures found in this study were undiagnosed in the original radiology reports. Vertebral fracture is common on chest radiographs but it is often ignored by radiologists. Genant’s semiquantitative assessment is a simple and effective method for detecting vertebral fracture. Because osteoporotic vertebral fracture increases the risk of new fractures, radiologists have an important role in accurately diagnosing vertebral fractures.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In severe OPLL cases, although ossified lesions were frequently seen at the intervertebral and vertebral levels around the cervicothoracic and thoracolumbar junctions in men, OPLL could be observed more diffusely in the thoracic spine in women.
Abstract: In patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) in the cervical spine, it is well known that the thoracic ossified lesions often coexist with the cervical lesions and can cause severe myelopathy. However, the prevalence of OPLL at each level of the thoracic and lumbar spinal segments is unknown. The aims of this study were to investigate how often OPLL occurs at each level in the thoracolumbar spine in patients with a radiological diagnosis of cervical OPLL and to identify the spinal levels most likely to develop ossification. Data were collected from 20 institutions in Japan. Three hundred and twenty-two patients with a diagnosis of cervical OPLL were included. The OPLL index (OP index), defined as the sum of the vertebral body and intervertebral disc levels where OPLL is present, was used to determine disease severity. An OP index ≥20 was defined as severe OPLL. The prevalence of OPLL at each level of the thoracic and lumbar spinal segments was calculated. Women were more likely to have ossified lesions in the thoracolumbar spine than men. Severe OPLL was significantly more common in women than in men (20% vs. 4.5%). For thoracic vertebral OPLL, the most frequently affected was the T1 segment in both men and women, followed by the T1/2 and T3/4 intervertebral levels in men and women, respectively. Ossified lesions were frequently seen at the intervertebral and vertebral levels around the cervicothoracic and thoracolumbar junctions in men with severe OPLL, whereas OPLL was more diffusely distributed in the thoracic spine in women with severe OPLL. Thoracolumbar OPLL occurred most often at T1 in men and at T3/4 in women. In severe OPLL cases, although ossified lesions were frequently seen at the intervertebral and vertebral levels around the cervicothoracic and thoracolumbar junctions in men, OPLL could be observed more diffusely in the thoracic spine in women.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The findings provide a sobering account of the significantly poorer outcomes after spine surgery compared with large-joint replacement and should be used to lobby research funding-bodies, governmental agencies, industry, and charitable foundations to invest more in spine research/registries in the hope of ultimately improving spine outcomes.
Abstract: Studies comparing the outcome of spine surgery with that of large-joint replacement report equivocal findings. The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in such studies are typically generic and may not be sufficiently sensitive to the successes/failures of treatment. This study compared different indices of “success” in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine, hip, or knee, using a validated, multidimensional, and joint-specific PROM. Preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively, 4594 patients (3937 lumbar spine, 368 hip, 269 knee) undergoing first-time surgery completed a PROM that included the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the affected joint. The latter comprises a set of single items on pain, function, symptom-specific well-being, quality of life, and disability—all in relation to the specified joint problem. Other single-item ratings of treatment success were made 12 months postoperatively. In multiple regression analyses, controlling for confounders, the mean improvement in COMI at 12 months was greatest for the hip patients and lowest for those with degenerative spinal deformity (= the statistical reference group) (p < 0.05). Compared with spinal deformity, the odds of achieving “success” were: higher for hip (OR 4.6; 95% CI 2.5–8.5) and knee (OR 4.0; 95% CI 2.1–7.7) (no difference between spine subgroups) for “satisfaction with care”; higher for hip (OR 16.9; 95% CI 7.3–39.6), knee (OR 6.3; 95% CI 3.4–11.6), degenerative spondylolisthesis (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.2–2.2), and herniated disc (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.2–2.4) for “global treatment outcome”; and higher for hip (OR 13.8; 95% CI 8.8–21.6), knee (OR 5.3; 95% CI 3.6–7.8), degenerative spondylolisthesis (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.3–2.1), and herniated disc (1.5; 95% CI 1.1–2.0) for “patient-acceptable symptom state”. Patient-rated complications were the greatest in degenerative spinal deformity (29%) and the lowest in hip (18%). The current study is the largest of its kind and the first to use a common, but joint-specific instrument to report patient-reported outcomes after surgery for degenerative disorders of the spine, hip, or knee. The findings provide a sobering account of the significantly poorer outcomes after spine surgery compared with large-joint replacement. Further work is required to hone the indications and patient selection criteria for spine surgery. The data should be used to lobby research funding-bodies, governmental agencies, industry, and charitable foundations to invest more in spine research/registries, in the hope of ultimately improving spine outcomes. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: “Within ring”-based SIRF not including the lumbar spine in the fixation range is a simple, safe, and low-invasive internal fixation method for UPRI.
Abstract: Spinopelvic fixation and triangular osteosynthesis give firm internal fixation for unstable pelvic ring injuries (UPRI), but with sacrifice of mobility of the lumbar spine. Here, we describe the procedure and outcomes of a new approach, which we refer to as “within ring”-based sacroiliac rod fixation (SIRF). The patient was placed in a prone position and longitudinal skin incisions were made at the medial margins of the bilateral posterior superior iliac spines (PSIS). After reduction of fracture, a pedicle screw was inserted into the first sacral vertebra on the injured side and iliac screws inserted through the bilateral PSIS were bridged using rods. SIRF was performed in 15 patients. The AO/OTA classification was 61-B2.3 in 1, C1.3 in 4, C2.3 in 7, C3.3 in 1, and H-type spinopelvic dissociation in two cases. The mean operative time was 179 (110–298) minutes, mean blood loss was 533 (100–2700) cc. One patient died during hospitalization and three patients stopped outpatient treatment. The other 11 patients achieved bone union without major loss of reduction in a mean post-operative follow-up period of 23.8 (4–50) months. The mean Majeed score at final follow-up was 86.7 (73–96) out of 96, excluding scoring sexual intercourse. “Within ring”-based SIRF not including the lumbar spine in the fixation range is a simple, safe, and low-invasive internal fixation method for UPRI.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Unexpectedly, an increment in metastasis size in the normal BMD spine produces a greater impact on vertebral stability compared to the osteoporotic spine.
Abstract: Cancer patients are likely to undergo osteoporosis as consequence of hormone manipulation and/or chemotherapy. Little is known about possible increased risk of fracture in this population. The aim of this study was to describe the biomechanical effect of a metastatic lesion in an osteoporotic lumbar spine model. A finite element model of two spinal motion segments (L3-L5) was extracted from a previously developed L3-Sacrum model and used to analyze the effect of metastasis size and bone mineral density (BMD) on Vertebral bulge (VB) and Vertebral height (VH). VB and VH represent respectively radial and axial displacement and they have been correlated to burst fracture. A total of 6 scenarios were evaluated combining three metastasis sizes (no metastasis, 15% and 30% of the vertebral body) and two BMD conditions (normal BMD and osteoporosis). 15% metastasis increased VB and VH by 178% and 248%, respectively in normal BMD model; while VB and VH increased by 134% and 174% in osteoporotic model. 30% metastasis increased VB and VH by 88% and 109%, respectively, when compared to 15% metastasis in normal BMD model; while VB and VH increased by 59% and 74% in osteoporotic model. A metastasis in the osteoporotic lumbar spine always leads to a higher risk of vertebral fracture. This risk increases with the size of the metastasis. Unexpectedly, an increment in metastasis size in the normal BMD spine produces a greater impact on vertebral stability compared to the osteoporotic spine.

Journal ArticleDOI
29 Oct 2018-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: This prospective 3-year cohort study of 12 child and adolescent weightlifters revealed abnormal lumbar findings in 11 participants at a high rate on MRI examination.
Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this three-year cohort study was to assess the incidence rates and characteristics of abnormal lumbar findings and low back pain (LBP) in child and adolescent weightlifting athletes using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and medical questionnaires. This study evaluated subclinical sports injuries, which in turn may help prevent competition-specific injuries and improve performance levels. Materials and methods Between 2014 and 2016, twelve participants who had been competing in weightlifting events for at least 2 years were enrolled in this study. The mean age of the participants at the start of this study was 11.4 ± 2.0 years, and there were 6 boys and 6 girls. Annual medical questionnaire surveys and lumbar examinations using MRI were performed during the 3-year follow-up. The incidence rates and variations of LBP and abnormal MRI findings were evaluated. Results At the start of this study, there were no positive findings of LBP, and abnormal lumbar findings on MRI were observed in only 2 participants. At the 2-year follow-up, 1 participant had LBP, and 8 of 12 participants had abnormal lumbar findings. In the final year, only 3 participants had LBP; however, abnormal lumbar findings were observed on MRI in 11 participants. Among these, lumbar spondylolysis was observed in 4 participants, lumbar disc protrusion or extrusion in 2 participants, and lumbar disc degeneration in 9 participants. Conclusion This prospective 3-year cohort study of 12 child and adolescent weightlifters revealed abnormal lumbar findings in 11 participants at a high rate on MRI examination. Children and adolescents undergoing resistance training at the competition level could potentially have irreversible changes in the lumbar vertebra without symptoms.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A novel indication for ESP block in ED; transverse process fracture of lumbar vertebra is reported.
Abstract: Plane blocks have become very popular in recent years with the introduction of ultrasonography into the regional anesthesia and algology practice. Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block was first described in 2016. ESP block involves injection of local anesthetics between erector spinae muscles and transverse process of thoracic or lumbar vertebrae and can block the dorsal and ventral rami of thoracolumbar spinal nerves. ESP block has been successfully reported to relieve the pain of multiple rib fracture in the emergency department (ED). Here we first report a novel indication for ESP block in ED; transverse process fracture of lumbar vertebra.

Journal Article
TL;DR: Compared with later interventions, PVP performed within 30 days after fracture development may be associated with a lower risk of adjacent fractures in the thoracolumbar region.
Abstract: BACKGROUND Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is widely used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). The influence of timing (early vs. late) of PVP on the development of adjacent vertebral fractures (AVF) has rarely been discussed. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare the incidence of AVF among patients who received early PVP (= 30 days after symptom onset, EPVP) or late PVP (> 30 days after symptom onset, LPVP) in the thoracolumbar region (T10 to L2) after a 1-year follow up. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective cohort study. SETTING Department of Orthopedic, an affiliated hospital of a medical university. METHODS Patients who had single-level, T-score = -2.5 of lumbar bone mineral density (BMD), primary OVCF in the thoracolumbar region (T10 to L2) and who received PVP between July 2012 and June 2014 were included in the study. They were divided into early PVP and late PVP groups according to the interval between symptom onset and treatment. The risk factors associated with subsequent AVFs were analyzed. RESULTS Of the 225 patients reviewed, 124 met the criteria and were followed for a minimum of 1 year. Eleven patients (14.1%) in the EPVP group (n = 78) and 18 patients (39.1%) in the LPVP group (n = 46) experienced an AVF during the first year following vertebroplasty. Outcomes were significantly better in patients with higher bone mineral density, lower cement volume, and without cement leakage (P < 0.01). Cox regression indicated an increase risk for AVF for LPVP, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 6.08 (95% confidence interval: 2.50-14.81). LIMITATION The incidence of AVFs could be over estimated due to this being a retrospective study with a small case number and lack of either biomechanical study of intra-vertebral cement distribution by times to support the result. CONCLUSIONS Compared with later interventions, PVP performed within 30 days after fracture development may be associated with a lower risk of adjacent fractures in the thoracolumbar region. KEY WORDS Percutaneous vertebroplasty, osteoporosis, osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture, adjacent vertebral fracture.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Therapies targeting the inflammatory process associated with ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene wear debris could reduce implant failure and therapies targeting neovascularization of discs following arthroplasty could mitigate periprosthetic pain.
Abstract: Introduction: Wear debris-induced osteolysis is a common cause of arthroplasty failure in several joints including the knee, hip and intervertebral disc. Debris from the prosthesis can trigger an i...

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Feb 2018-Spine
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify the international nuances in surgical treatment patterns for severals lumbar degenerative conditions, specifically, to identify differences in responses in each country group and different treatment trends across countries.
Abstract: Study Design.Electronic survey.Objective.The aim of this study was to identify the international nuances in surgical treatment patterns for severals lumbar degenerative conditions, specifically, to identify differences in responses in each country groupand different treatment trends across countries

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Adjacent segment disease and the need for revision surgery were significantly higher in the fusion group than those in the non-fusion group and both matrix metalloproteinase 3 and the 28-joint disease activity score incorporating C-reactive protein levels (DAS28-CRP) were significantly associated with the incidence and severity of ASD.