This has been wonderful support for the University and I very much appreciate your role and others at JSC in giving us good advice and direction. As you can see from the table of contents, the program has covered a very broad range of topics. The 15 technical reports are those which were directly supported by the grant. Note also. that 13 M.Sc. and 11 Ph.D. students have also been directly involved in this effort. Finally, four staff members (Tesar, Tosunoglu, Hooper, and Freeman) have beer. involved and participated in the direction of the research.

University of Texas at Austin의 연구 현황

The performance bottlenecks of graph applications depend not only on the algorithm and the underlying hardware, but also on the size and structure of the input graph. As a result, programmers must try different combinations of a large set of techniques, which make tradeoffs among locality, work-efficiency, and parallelism, to develop the best implementation for a specific algorithm and type of graph. Existing graph frameworks and domain specific languages (DSLs) lack flexibility, supporting only a limited set of optimizations. This paper introduces GraphIt, a new DSL for graph computations that generates fast implementations for algorithms with different performance characteristics running on graphs with different sizes and structures. GraphIt separates what is computed (algorithm) from how it is computed (schedule). Programmers specify the algorithm using an algorithm language, and performance optimizations are specified using a separate scheduling language. The algorithm language simplifies expressing the algorithms, while exposing opportunities for optimizations. We formulate graph optimizations, including edge traversal direction, data layout, parallelization, cache, NUMA, and kernel fusion optimizations, as tradeoffs among locality, parallelism, and work-efficiency. The scheduling language enables programmers to easily search through this complicated tradeoff space by composing together a large set of edge traversal, vertex data layout, and program structure optimizations. The separation of algorithm and schedule also enables us to build an autotuner on top of GraphIt to automatically find high-performance schedules. The compiler uses a new scheduling representation, the graph iteration space, to model, compose, and ensure the validity of the large number of optimizations. We evaluate GraphIt’s performance with seven algorithms on graphs with different structures and sizes. GraphIt outperforms the next fastest of six state-of-the-art shared-memory frameworks (Ligra, Green-Marl, GraphMat, Galois, Gemini, and Grazelle) on 24 out of 32 experiments by up to 4.8×, and is never more than 43% slower than the fastest framework on the other experiments. GraphIt also reduces the lines of code by up to an order of magnitude compared to the next fastest framework.

https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3276491

GraphIt: a high-performance graph DSL

This paper introduces a new approach to building distributed-memory graph analytics systems that exploits heterogeneity in processor types (CPU and GPU), partitioning policies, and programming models. The key to this approach is Gluon, a communication-optimizing substrate. Programmers write applications in a shared-memory programming system of their choice and interface these applications with Gluon using a lightweight API. Gluon enables these programs to run on heterogeneous clusters and optimizes communication in a novel way by exploiting structural and temporal invariants of graph partitioning policies. To demonstrate Gluon’s ability to support different programming models, we interfaced Gluon with the Galois and Ligra shared-memory graph analytics systems to produce distributed-memory versions of these systems named D-Galois and D-Ligra, respectively. To demonstrate Gluon’s ability to support heterogeneous processors, we interfaced Gluon with IrGL, a state-of-the-art single-GPU system for graph analytics, to produce D-IrGL, the first multi-GPU distributed-memory graph analytics system. Our experiments were done on CPU clusters with up to 256 hosts and roughly 70,000 threads and on multi-GPU clusters with up to 64 GPUs. The communication optimizations in Gluon improve end-to-end application execution time by ∼2.6× on the average. D-Galois and D-IrGL scale well and are faster than Gemini, the state-of-the-art distributed CPU graph analytics system, by factors of ∼3.9× and ∼4.9×, respectively, on the average.

https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3296979.3192404

Gluon: a communication-optimizing substrate for distributed heterogeneous graph analytics

Task-based programming models for shared memory--such as Cilk Plus and OpenMP 3--are well established and documented. However, with the increase in parallel, many-core, and heterogeneous systems, a number of research-driven projects have developed more diversified task-based support, employing various programming and runtime features. Unfortunately, despite the fact that dozens of different task-based systems exist today and are actively used for parallel and high-performance computing (HPC), no comprehensive overview or classification of task-based technologies for HPC exists. In this paper, we provide an initial task-focused taxonomy for HPC technologies, which covers both programming interfaces and runtime mechanisms. We demonstrate the usefulness of our taxonomy by classifying state-of-the-art task-based environments in use today.

/pdf/a-taxonomy-of-task-based-parallel-programming-technologies-1u81vvcm2f.pdf

A taxonomy of task-based parallel programming technologies for high-performance computing

There has been significant recent interest in parallel graph processing due to the need to quickly analyze the large graphs available today. Many graph codes have been designed for distributed memory or external memory. However, today even the largest publicly-available real-world graph (the Hyperlink Web graph with over 3.5 billion vertices and 128 billion edges) can fit in the memory of a single commodity multicore server. Nevertheless, most experimental work in the literature report results on much smaller graphs, and the ones for the Hyperlink graph use distributed or external memory. Therefore, it is natural to ask whether we can efficiently solve a broad class of graph problems on this graph in memory. This paper shows that theoretically-efficient parallel graph algorithms can scale to the largest publicly-available graphs using a single machine with a terabyte of RAM, processing them in minutes. We give implementations of theoretically-efficient parallel algorithms for 13 important graph problems. We also present the optimizations and techniques that we used in our implementations, which were crucial in enabling us to process these large graphs quickly. We show that the running times of our implementations outperform existing state-of-the-art implementations on the largest real-world graphs. For many of the problems that we consider, this is the first time they have been solved on graphs at this scale. We provide a publicly-available benchmark suite containing our implementations.

https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3210377.3210414

Theoretically Efficient Parallel Graph Algorithms Can Be Fast and Scalable

In the past few decades, a number of user-level threading and tasking models have been proposed in the literature to address the shortcomings of OS-level threads, primarily with respect to cost and flexibility. Current state-of-the-art user-level threading and tasking models, however, either are too specific to applications or architectures or are not as powerful or flexible. In this paper, we present Argobots, a lightweight, low-level threading and tasking framework that is designed as a portable and performant substrate for high-level programming models or runtime systems. Argobots offers a carefully designed execution model that balances generality of functionality with providing a rich set of controls to allow specialization by end users or high-level programming models. We describe the design, implementation, and performance characterization of Argobots and present integrations with three high-level models: OpenMP, MPI, and colocated I/O services. Evaluations show that (1) Argobots, while providing richer capabilities, is competitive with existing simpler generic threading runtimes; (2) our OpenMP runtime offers more efficient interoperability capabilities than production OpenMP runtimes do; (3) when MPI interoperates with Argobots instead of Pthreads, it enjoys reduced synchronization costs and better latency-hiding capabilities; and (4) I/O services with Argobots reduce interference with colocated applications while achieving performance competitive with that of a Pthreads approach.

Argobots: A Lightweight Low-Level Threading and Tasking Framework

Distributed-memory multi-core clusters enable in-memory processing of very large graphs with billions of nodes and edges. Recent distributed graph analytics systems have been built on top of MPI. However, communication in graph applications is very irregular, and each host exchanges different amounts of non-contiguous data with other hosts. MPI does not support such a communication pattern well, and it has limited ability to integrate communication with serialization, deserialization, and graph computation tasks. In this paper, we describe a lightweight communication runtime called LCI that supports a large number of threads on each host and avoids the semantic mismatches between the requirements of graph computations and the communication library in MPI. The implementation of LCI is informed by lessons learnt from two baseline MPI-based implementations. We have successfully integrated LCI with two state-of-the-art graph analytics systems - Gemini and Abelian. LCI improves the latency up to 3.5x for microbenchmarks compared to MPI solutions and improves the end-to-end performance of distributed graph algorithms by up to 2x.

A Lightweight Communication Runtime for Distributed Graph Analytics

Hardware trends indicate that supercomputers will see fast growing intra-node parallelism. Future programming models will need to carefully manage the interaction between inter- and intra-node parallelism to cope with this evolution. There exist many programming models which expose both levels of parallelism. However, they do not scale well as per-node thread counts rise and there is limited interoperability between threading and communication, leading to unnecessary software overheads and an increased amount of unnecessary communication. To address this, it is necessary to understand the limitations of current models and develop new approaches.We propose a new runtime system design, PPL, which abstracts important high-level concepts of a typical parallel system for distributed-memory machines. By modularizing these elements, layers can be tested to better understand the needs of future programming models. We present details of the design and development implementation of PPL in C++11 and evaluate the performance of several different module implementations through micro-benchmarks and three applications: Barnes-Hut, Monte Carlo particle tracking, and a sparse-triangular solver.

/pdf/ppl-an-abstract-runtime-system-for-hybrid-parallel-uix9f4uib2.pdf

Alex Brooks

Papers

Gluon: a communication-optimizing substrate for distributed heterogeneous graph analytics

Argobots: A Lightweight Low-Level Threading and Tasking Framework

A Lightweight Communication Runtime for Distributed Graph Analytics

PPL: an abstract runtime system for hybrid parallel programming