scispace - formally typeset
A

Anders Nordgren

Researcher at Centre for Applied Ethics

Publications -  48
Citations -  3530

Anders Nordgren is an academic researcher from Centre for Applied Ethics. The author has contributed to research in topics: Soil respiration & Climate change. The author has an hindex of 18, co-authored 46 publications receiving 3331 citations. Previous affiliations of Anders Nordgren include Linköping University & Uppsala University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Large-scale forest girdling shows that current photosynthesis drives soil respiration

TL;DR: Girdling reduced soil respiration within 1–2 months by about 54% relative to respiration on ungirdled control plots, and that decreases of up to 37% were detected within 5 days, which clearly show that the flux of current assimilates to roots is a key driver of soil resppiration.
Journal ArticleDOI

Contrasting effects of nitrogen availability on plant carbon supply to mycorrhizal fungi and saprotrophs - a hypothesis based on field observations in boreal forest.

TL;DR: It is hypothesize that low N supply and plant productivity, and hence low litter C supply to saprotrophs is associated with a high plant C supplyTo mycorrhizal fungi, while the reverse occurs under high N supply, and should mean that effects of N availability onC supply to these functional groups of microbes acts in opposing directions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Is growth of soil microorganisms in boreal forests limited by carbon or nitrogen availability

TL;DR: In this article, the authors applied sucrose from sugar cane, a C4 plant, to the organic mor-layer of a boreal Pinus sylvestris-Vaccinium vitis-idaea forest to study whether the biomass of soil microorganisms was limited by the availability of carbon or nitrogen.
Journal ArticleDOI

Carbon allocation between tree root growth and root respiration in boreal pine forest

TL;DR: It is suggested that 75% of the C allocated to roots is respired, while 25% is used for growth, and hence that root growth and turnover were grossly overestimated in the SWECON study.