scispace - formally typeset
A

Andrea F. Presbitero

Researcher at Johns Hopkins University

Publications -  131
Citations -  4256

Andrea F. Presbitero is an academic researcher from Johns Hopkins University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Debt & External debt. The author has an hindex of 30, co-authored 128 publications receiving 3600 citations. Previous affiliations of Andrea F. Presbitero include Center for Economic and Policy Research & International Monetary Fund.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Banks, Firms, and Jobs

TL;DR: In this article, the authors used a rich data set of over 1.5 million individual job contracts in an Italian region, matched with the universe of firms and their lending banks.
Journal ArticleDOI

Financing for development: editors’ introduction

TL;DR: In this double issue of the Oxford Review of Economic Policy as discussed by the authors, a set of papers concerned with the mobilization of domestic and foreign capital in support of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that were launched in September 2015 are published.
BookDOI

Mobilization Effects of Multilateral Development Banks

TL;DR: The authors used loan-level data on syndicated lending to estimate the mobilization effects of multilateral development banks (MDBs), that is, their ability to crowd-in capital from private creditors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Technology Adoption, Market Structure, and the Cost of Bank Intermediation

TL;DR: The authors studied the U.S. cost of financial intermediation and its inverted U-shape behavior since the mid-1960s and found that the banking sector structure is the main determinant of the long-run level of the CFI.
Posted Content

The Determinants of Economic Development Insitution or Geography

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that the institutional view is not so strong as it may appear: different specifications and different institutional indicators undermine the exclusive importance of institutions and the results of ACEmoglu, Johnson and Robinson in favour of the institutional approach are no more valid if other institutional indicators are used instead of the risk of expropriation.