scispace - formally typeset
A

Andrey Feklistov

Researcher at Rockefeller University

Publications -  16
Citations -  1292

Andrey Feklistov is an academic researcher from Rockefeller University. The author has contributed to research in topics: RNA polymerase & Polymerase. The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 16 publications receiving 1116 citations. Previous affiliations of Andrey Feklistov include Russian Academy of Sciences & Moscow State University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Bacterial Sigma Factors: A Historical, Structural, and Genomic Perspective

TL;DR: The key advances in σ biology are recounted, from their discovery 45 years ago to the most recent progress in understanding their structure and function at the atomic level, and both the housekeeping and alternative σs are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Structural Basis for Promoter −10 Element Recognition by the Bacterial RNA Polymerase σ Subunit

TL;DR: The key step in bacterial promoter opening is recognition of the -10 promoter element (T(-12)A(-11)T(-10),A(-9)A (-8)T (-7) consensus sequence) by the RNA polymerase σ subunit.
Journal ArticleDOI

Structure of a bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme open promoter complex

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors determined crystal structures, refined to 4.14 A-resolution, of RPo containing Thermus aquaticus RNAP holoenzyme and promoter DNA that includes the full transcription bubble.
Journal ArticleDOI

A basal promoter element recognized by free RNA polymerase σ subunit determines promoter recognition by RNA polymerase holoenzyme

TL;DR: During transcription initiation by bacterial RNA polymerase, the sigma subunit recognizes the -35 and -10 promoter elements; free sigma, however, does not bind DNA; recognition of bacterial promoters is controlled by independent interactions of sigma with multiple basal promoter elements.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rifamycins do not function by allosteric modulation of binding of Mg2+ to the RNA polymerase active center

TL;DR: It is shown that rifamycins do not affect the affinity of binding of Mg2+ to the RNAP active center, and the three lines of biochemical evidence are reassessed, obtaining results not supportive of the proposal.