scispace - formally typeset
A

Antonietta Pepe

Researcher at University of Bordeaux

Publications -  28
Citations -  938

Antonietta Pepe is an academic researcher from University of Bordeaux. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Brain asymmetry. The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 28 publications receiving 677 citations. Previous affiliations of Antonietta Pepe include Aix-Marseille University & Centre national de la recherche scientifique.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Machine learning framework for early MRI-based Alzheimer's conversion prediction in MCI subjects.

TL;DR: The results presented in this study demonstrate the potential of the suggested approach for early AD diagnosis and an important role of MRI in the MCI-to-AD conversion prediction.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation and Comparison of Current Fetal Ultrasound Image Segmentation Methods for Biometric Measurements: A Grand Challenge

TL;DR: Evaluation results of the methods submitted to Challenge US: Biometric Measurements from Fetal Ultrasound Images, a segmentation challenge held at the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 2012, show the femur sub-challenge had inferior performance to the head sub-Challenge, and several groups produced results that could be potentially used in clinical settings, with comparable performance to manual delineations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Automatic statistical shape analysis of cerebral asymmetry in 3D T1-weighted magnetic resonance images at vertex-level: application to neuroleptic-naïve schizophrenia.

TL;DR: In this article, a deformable model-based algorithm was used to extract the salient morphological features while establishing the point correspondence between the surfaces of the cerebral hemispheric surfaces, and the interhemispheric asymmetry was evaluated in a few thousands of corresponding surface vertices and tested for statistical significance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Difference of Gaussians revolved along elliptical paths for ultrasound fetal head segmentation.

TL;DR: The automatically derived biometric measurements were as accurate as the manual measurements and the segmentation accuracy was superior to the accuracy of the other automatic methods that have been evaluated using the same data.