scispace - formally typeset
B

Bart Larivière

Researcher at Ghent University

Publications -  53
Citations -  2859

Bart Larivière is an academic researcher from Ghent University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Customer retention & Customer satisfaction. The author has an hindex of 21, co-authored 49 publications receiving 2377 citations. Previous affiliations of Bart Larivière include Katholieke Universiteit Leuven & Erasmus University Rotterdam.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Customer attrition analysis for financial services using proportional hazard models

TL;DR: These findings suggest that: (1) demographic characteristics, environmental changes and stimulating ‘interactive and continuous’ relationships with customers are of major concern when considering retention; (2) customer behaviour predictors only have a limited impact on attrition in terms of total products owned as well as the interpurchase time.
Journal ArticleDOI

Predicting customer retention and profitability by using random forests and regression forests techniques

TL;DR: The research findings demonstrate that both random forests techniques provide better fit for the estimation and validation sample compared to ordinary linear regression and logistic regression models, and suggest that past customer behavior is more important to generate repeat purchasing and favorable profitability evolutions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Investigating the role of product features in preventing customer churn, by using survival analysis and choice modeling: The case of financial services

TL;DR: The results of this study indicate that customer retention cannot be understood by solely relying on customer characteristics, and it might be true that “not all customers are created equal”, but neither are all products.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Meta-Analysis of Relationships Linking Service Failure Attributions to Customer Outcomes

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate whether the service firm could have prevented the failure (controllability attribution) and whether the cau-tability attribution could have been improved.