The fourth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumours of the central nervous system, published in 2007, lists several new entities, including angiocentric glioma, papillary glioneuronal tumour, rosette-forming glioneuronal tumour of the fourth ventricle, papillary tumour of the pineal region, pituicytoma and spindle cell oncocytoma of the adenohypophysis. Histological variants were added if there was evidence of a different age distribution, location, genetic profile or clinical behaviour; these included pilomyxoid astrocytoma, anaplastic medulloblastoma and medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity. The WHO grading scheme and the sections on genetic profiles were updated and the rhabdoid tumour predisposition syndrome was added to the list of familial tumour syndromes typically involving the nervous system. As in the previous, 2000 edition of the WHO ‘Blue Book’, the classification is accompanied by a concise commentary on clinico-pathological characteristics of each tumour type. The 2007 WHO classification is based on the consensus of an international Working Group of 25 pathologists and geneticists, as well as contributions from more than 70 international experts overall, and is presented as the standard for the definition of brain tumours to the clinical oncology and cancer research communities world-wide.

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00401-007-0243-4.pdf

The 2007 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System

The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System is both a conceptual and practical advance over its 2007 predecessor. For the first time, the WHO classification of CNS tumors uses molecular parameters in addition to histology to define many tumor entities, thus formulating a concept for how CNS tumor diagnoses should be structured in the molecular era. As such, the 2016 CNS WHO presents major restructuring of the diffuse gliomas, medulloblastomas and other embryonal tumors, and incorporates new entities that are defined by both histology and molecular features, including glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype and glioblastoma, IDH-mutant; diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27M-mutant; RELA fusion-positive ependymoma; medulloblastoma, WNT-activated and medulloblastoma, SHH-activated; and embryonal tumour with multilayered rosettes, C19MC-altered. The 2016 edition has added newly recognized neoplasms, and has deleted some entities, variants and patterns that no longer have diagnostic and/or biological relevance. Other notable changes include the addition of brain invasion as a criterion for atypical meningioma and the introduction of a soft tissue-type grading system for the now combined entity of solitary fibrous tumor / hemangiopericytoma-a departure from the manner by which other CNS tumors are graded. Overall, it is hoped that the 2016 CNS WHO will facilitate clinical, experimental and epidemiological studies that will lead to improvements in the lives of patients with brain tumors.

/pdf/the-2016-world-health-organization-classification-of-tumors-1rt6cpzcew.pdf

The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.

The Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS), in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and National Cancer Institute (NCI), is the largest population-based registry focused exclusively on primary brain and other central nervous system (CNS) tumors in the United States (US) and represents the entire US population. This report contains the most up-to-date population-based data on primary brain tumors (malignant and non-malignant) and supersedes all previous CBTRUS reports in terms of completeness and accuracy. All rates (incidence and mortality) are age-adjusted using the 2000 US standard population and presented per 100,000 population. The average annual age-adjusted incidence rate (AAAIR) of all malignant and non-malignant brain and other CNS tumors was 23.79 (Malignant AAAIR=7.08, non-Malignant AAAIR=16.71). This rate was higher in females compared to males (26.31 versus 21.09), Blacks compared to Whites (23.88 versus 23.83), and non-Hispanics compared to Hispanics (24.23 versus 21.48). The most commonly occurring malignant brain and other CNS tumor was glioblastoma (14.5% of all tumors), and the most common non-malignant tumor was meningioma (38.3% of all tumors). Glioblastoma was more common in males, and meningioma was more common in females. In children and adolescents (age 0-19 years), the incidence rate of all primary brain and other CNS tumors was 6.14. An estimated 83,830 new cases of malignant and non-malignant brain and other CNS tumors are expected to be diagnosed in the US in 2020 (24,970 malignant and 58,860 non-malignant). There were 81,246 deaths attributed to malignant brain and other CNS tumors between 2013 and 2017. This represents an average annual mortality rate of 4.42. The 5-year relative survival rate following diagnosis of a malignant brain and other CNS tumor was 23.5% and for a non-malignant brain and other CNS tumor was 82.4%.

CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007-2011.

Pathology and genetics of tumors of soft tissue and bone

Astrocytes are specialized glial cells that outnumber neurons by over fivefold. They contiguously tile the entire central nervous system (CNS) and exert many essential complex functions in the healthy CNS. Astrocytes respond to all forms of CNS insults through a process referred to as reactive astrogliosis, which has become a pathological hallmark of CNS structural lesions. Substantial progress has been made recently in determining functions and mechanisms of reactive astrogliosis and in identifying roles of astrocytes in CNS disorders and pathologies. A vast molecular arsenal at the disposal of reactive astrocytes is being defined. Transgenic mouse models are dissecting specific aspects of reactive astrocytosis and glial scar formation in vivo. Astrocyte involvement in specific clinicopathological entities is being defined. It is now clear that reactive astrogliosis is not a simple all-or-none phenomenon but is a finely gradated continuum of changes that occur in context-dependent manners regulated by specific signaling events. These changes range from reversible alterations in gene expression and cell hypertrophy with preservation of cellular domains and tissue structure, to long-lasting scar formation with rearrangement of tissue structure. Increasing evidence points towards the potential of reactive astrogliosis to play either primary or contributing roles in CNS disorders via loss of normal astrocyte functions or gain of abnormal effects. This article reviews (1) astrocyte functions in healthy CNS, (2) mechanisms and functions of reactive astrogliosis and glial scar formation, and (3) ways in which reactive astrocytes may cause or contribute to specific CNS disorders and lesions.

/pdf/astrocytes-biology-and-pathology-2hq13zf0bo.pdf

Astrocytes: biology and pathology

Assessment of mitotic activity represents one of the oldest and most routinely used histopathologic methods of evaluating the biological aggressiveness of human tumors. In the case of pituitary tumors, however, the relevance of this approach as a means of gauging tumor behavior remains ill-defined. In this article, the relationship between the mitotic index and biological aggressiveness of pituitary tumors was evaluated in a series of 54 pituitary adenomas and 6 primary pituitary carcinomas. All tumors were fully classified by immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy; adenomas were further stratified on the basis of their invasion status, the latter being defined as gross, operatively, or radiologically apparent infiltration of dura or bone. Mitotic figures were present in 11 tumors, 10 being either invasive adenomas or pituitary carcinomas. A significant association between the presence of mitotic figures and tumor behavior was noted, as evidenced by progressive increments in the proportion of cases expressing mitotic figures in the categories of noninvasive adenoma, invasive adenoma, and pituitary carcinoma (3.9, 21.4, and 66.7%, respectively; Fisher's exact test, two-tailed, p < 0.001). The mitotic index, however, appeared to be a less informative parameter, being extremely low in all cases (mean = 0.016% +/- 0.005 [+/- SEMI). Although the mean mitotic index in pituitary carcinomas (0.09% +/- 0.035) was significantly higher than the mean mitotic index of either noninvasive adenomas (0.002% +/- 0.002) or invasive adenomas (0.013% +/- 0.005), no practical threshold value capable of distinguishing these three groups was evident. Comparison of the mitotic index with Ki-67 derived growth fractions in these tumors revealed a significant but weak linear correlation (r = 0.41, p < 0.01). These data suggest that when, mitotic figures are present, they do provide some indication of the behavior and invasive potential of pituitary tumors. For routine diagnostic purposes, however, the discriminating power of this parameter is somewhat limited, being superseded by alternative and more informative methods of growth fraction determination such as that provided by the Ki-67 immunolabeling.

Assessment of Mitotic Activity in Pituitary Adenomas and Carcinomas.

Co-deletion of chromosome arms 1p and 19q, characteristic of oligodendroglial tumors, was recently found to be mediated by t(1;19)(q10;p10). To evaluate the prevalence of 1p19q co-deletion and t(1;19) in extraventricular neurocytomas (EVN), we studied tumors from 23 patients, including 13 females and 10 males (median age at diagnosis 34 years, range 2-76 years). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies were performed with probes targeting 1p36/1q25 and 19q13/19p13 to assess for 1p19q co-deletion, as well as chromosome 1 alpha-satellite and 19p12 to detect t(1;19)(q10;p10). FISH was successful in 21 (91%) cases and demonstrated 1p19q co-deletion in five cases (24%) or isolated 1p loss in two cases (10%). Evidence for t(1;19) was found in four (of five) cases with 1p19q co-deletion. Three tumors with 1p19q loss and t(1;19) demonstrated atypical histologic features, compared with one (of 17) tumors without 1p19q co-deletion (P = 0.01, Fisher exact test). In addition, tumors with t(1;19) showed increased mitotic activity compared with tumors without t(1;19) (P = 0.045; Wilcoxon rank sum test). The four patients with t(1;19) developed tumor recurrence (n = 3), or expired (n = 2) 3.5 to 5.5 years after first resection. These results suggest that 1p19q loss and t(1;19) occur in a subset of EVN, and may be associated with aggressive histology in these tumors.

Interphase Cytogenetics for 1p19q and t(1;19)(q10;p10) may Distinguish Prognostically Relevant Subgroups in Extraventricular Neurocytoma

Pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence.

In a wide spectrum of tumors, cell proliferation, vascularity, apoptosis, cell adhesion, and cell-cycle progression may indicate tumor progression. In this review article, the literature regarding apoptotic markers and p53, as well as cyclooxygenase-2, galectin-3, and pituitary tumor-transforming factor, proliferative markers, angiogenesis, including vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor, pituitary tumor-transforming gene, microarrays, stem cells, and microenvironment and tumor heterogeneity are presented. Only a particular group of selected biomarkers show promise in differentiating pituitary tumors which will behave in an aggressive manner. Therefore, the most common and promising biomarkers and terms were analyzed, proposing the need for uniform design and application of methods and standardized criteria for the interpretation of results. The new spectrum of biomarkers may shed light upon the pathogenetic mechanisms and also may serve as standardized diagnostic tool for daily pathologic practice.

Biomarkers of Pituitary Neoplasms

We have examined a series of 135 gliomas for alterations of the p53, CDKN2A (p16) and PTEN tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) in order to evaluate the incidence of their inactivation as a function of tumor malignancy and cellular differentiation, and to examine potential associations with patient outcome. The composition of this series, classified using WHO criteria, is as follows: 27 grade 2 tumors (11 astrocytomas, 12 oligoastrocytomas, 4 oligodendrogliomas), 42 grade 3 tumors (22 astrocytomas, 16 oligoastrocytomas, 4 oligodendrogliomas), and 66 grade 4 tumors (63 astrocytomas and 3 oligoastrocytomas). Similar frequencies of p53 mutation were observed among grade 2 (37.0%), and grade 3 tumors (38.1%), as well as between astrocytomas and mixed tumors. CDKN2A and PTEN mutations were clearly associated with increasing tumor malignancy (occurring in 0% of grade 2 tumors, 14.3% and 4.8% respectively of grade 3 tumors, and 27.3% and 30.3% respectively of grade 4 tumors) and were observed at substantially higher rates among astrocytomas. For the tumor suppressor genes examined, there was no relationship between the occurrence of any two TSG inactivation events. With regard to outcome, the p53 genetic status showed no significant relationship with patient survival. The CDKN2 and PTEN alterations were negative prognostic indicators of survival when evaluated in all 135 gliomas, but failed to predict outcome when evaluated in either of the high grade (3 or 4) tumor groups.

Bernd W. Scheithauer

Papers

Assessment of Mitotic Activity in Pituitary Adenomas and Carcinomas.

Interphase Cytogenetics for 1p19q and t(1;19)(q10;p10) may Distinguish Prognostically Relevant Subgroups in Extraventricular Neurocytoma

Pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence.

Biomarkers of Pituitary Neoplasms

Tumor suppressor gene alterations in malignant gliomas: histopathological associations and prognostic evaluation.