scispace - formally typeset
B

Boris Hayete

Researcher at Boston University

Publications -  16
Citations -  4687

Boris Hayete is an academic researcher from Boston University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Causal model & Internal medicine. The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 14 publications receiving 4188 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A Common Mechanism of Cellular Death Induced by Bactericidal Antibiotics

TL;DR: The results suggest that all three major classes of bactericidal drugs can be potentiated by targeting bacterial systems that remediate hydroxyl radical damage, including proteins involved in triggering the DNA damage response, e.g., RecA.
Journal ArticleDOI

Large-scale mapping and validation of Escherichia coli transcriptional regulation from a compendium of expression profiles.

TL;DR: The compendium of expression data compiled in this study, coupled with RegulonDB, provides a valuable model system for further improvement of network inference algorithms using experimental data.
Journal ArticleDOI

Gyrase Inhibitors Induce an Oxidative Damage Cellular Death Pathway in Escherichia Coli

TL;DR: It is shown that superoxide‐mediated oxidation of iron–sulfur clusters promotes a breakdown of iron regulatory dynamics and drives the generation of highly destructive hydroxyl radicals via the Fenton reaction, and that blockage of hydroxy radical formation increases the survival of gyrase‐poisoned cells.
Journal ArticleDOI

Large-scale identification of clinical and genetic predictors of motor progression in patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease: a longitudinal cohort study and validation

TL;DR: The authors' model ensemble confirmed established and identified novel predictors of PD motor progression and showed that incorporating the predicted rates of motor progression into the final models of treatment effect reduced the variability in the study outcome.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Gotrees: predicting go associations from protein domain composition using decision trees.

TL;DR: The method is more sensitive when compared to the InterPro2GO performance and suffers only some precision decrease, and improved the sensitivity by 22%, 27% and 50% for Molecular Function, Biological Process and Cellular GO terms respectively.