Cara R. Nelson

TL;DR: The second edition of the International Principles and Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration (the Standards) presents a robust framework for restoration projects to achieve intended goals, while addressing challenges including effective design and implementation, accounting for complex ecosystem dynamics (especially in the context of climate change), and navigating trade-offs associated with land management priorities and decisions as mentioned in this paper.

TL;DR: In this paper, a landscape management framework that incorporates all systems, across the spectrum of degrees of alteration, provides a fuller set of options for how and when to intervene, uses limited resources more effectively, and increases the chances of achieving management goals.

TL;DR: A critical analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the NbS principles can inform the review and revision of principles supporting specific types of N bS (such as the approaches reviewed here), as well as serve as the foundation for the development of standards for the successful implementation of NBS.

TL;DR: A document that provides standards to guide practitioners, operational personnel, planners, managers, regulators, and funding agencies involved in restoring degraded ecosystems anywhere in the world- whether terrestrial, freshwater, coastal or marine.

TL;DR: This paper conducted an intensive review of conservation science to find out whether the field has tracked priorities over the past 20 years and found geographic gaps in conservation research, with marine, tundra, and desert biomes being studied less than other systems.