Christopher M. Raymond

TL;DR: Social learning is increasingly becoming a normative goal in natural resource management and policy, but there remains little consensus over its meaning or theoretical basis as discussed by the authors. This lack of conceptual clarity has limited our capacity to assess whether social learning has occurred, and if so, what kind of learning has taken place, to what extent, between whom, when, and how.

TL;DR: It is argued that there is no single optimum approach for integrating local and scientific knowledge and a shift in science is encouraged from the development of knowledge integration products to theDevelopment of problem-focussed, knowledge integration processes.

TL;DR: In this article, Williams et al. examined the relationship between place attachment and landscape values using two measures of place attachment, a psychometric, scale-based measure and a map based measure derived from mapped special places.

TL;DR: In this article, a four-dimensional model of rural landholder attachments to their natural resource management region was developed with the aim of developing an integrated approach to the measurement of place attachment that clearly distinguishes between different elements of place scholarship.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors presented a community values mapping method based on the concept of natural capital and ecosystem services and the landscape values methodology to link local perception of place to a broader measure of environmental values at the landscape level.