D
Daniel R. Jeske
Researcher at University of California, Riverside
Publications - 154
Citations - 2977
Daniel R. Jeske is an academic researcher from University of California, Riverside. The author has contributed to research in topics: Estimator & CUSUM. The author has an hindex of 30, co-authored 151 publications receiving 2709 citations. Previous affiliations of Daniel R. Jeske include AT&T & Qualcomm.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Mean Squared Error of Estimation or Prediction under a General Linear Model
TL;DR: In this article, the problem of predicting a linear combination of the fixed and random effects of a mixed-effects linear model is considered, where the best linear-unbiased predictor depends on parameters which generally are unknown.
Journal ArticleDOI
Baseline and stress-induced plasma corticosterone concentrations of mice selectively bred for high voluntary wheel running
Jessica L. Malisch,Wendy Saltzman,Fernando Ribeiro Gomes,Fernando Ribeiro Gomes,Enrico L. Rezende,Daniel R. Jeske,Theodore Garland +6 more
TL;DR: The results suggest that selection for increased locomotor activity has caused correlated changes in the HPA axis, resulting in higher baseline CORT concentrations and, possibly, reduced stress responsiveness and a lower growth rate.
Journal ArticleDOI
On maximum-likelihood estimation of clock offset
TL;DR: It is shown that the MLE corresponds to a previously proposed estimator of clock offset, and the ML interpretation of the estimator provides further insight and motivation for its use.
Journal ArticleDOI
Fenofibrate Represses Interleukin-17 and Interferon-γ Expression and Improves Colitis in Interleukin-10-Deficient Mice
Jimmy W. Lee,Poonam J. Bajwa,Monica J. Carson,Daniel R. Jeske,Yingzi Cong,Charles O. Elson,Christian Lytle,Daniel S. Straus +7 more
TL;DR: The novel therapeutic activity of fenofibrate in this mouse model suggests that it may also have activity in Crohn's disease.
Journal ArticleDOI
Statistical Inference: An Integrated Approach
TL;DR: In this article, a short chapter on goodness-of-µ t tests (Chap. 6), and it is lacking in several respects, including the coverage of topics and the conclusions presented.