scispace - formally typeset
D

Daniel S. Joyce

Researcher at University of Nevada, Reno

Publications -  19
Citations -  304

Daniel S. Joyce is an academic researcher from University of Nevada, Reno. The author has contributed to research in topics: Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells & Circadian rhythm. The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 14 publications receiving 205 citations. Previous affiliations of Daniel S. Joyce include Stanford University & Queensland University of Technology.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Melanopsin-mediated pupil function is impaired in Parkinson's disease.

TL;DR: In this article, melanopsin and rod/cone photoreceptors were evaluated to determine if non-motor symptoms observed in Parkinson's disease are linked to ipRGC dysfunction.
Journal ArticleDOI

Temporal characteristics of melanopsin inputs to the human pupil light reflex

TL;DR: It is inferred that outer retina summation is important for rapidly controlling pupil diameter in response to short timescale fluctuations in illumination and may occur at two potential sites, one that is presynaptic to extrinsic photoreceptor input to ipR GCs, or another within the pupil control pathway if ipRGCs have differential temporal tuning to extrINSic and intrinsic signalling.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Effects of Short-Term Light Adaptation on the Human Post-Illumination Pupil Response

TL;DR: Light and dark adaptation have opposite effects on the pupil metrics, which should be normalized to baseline to minimize significant correlations between constriction and PIPR amplitudes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Melanopsin-mediated post-illumination pupil response in the peripheral retina.

TL;DR: In this paper, the relationship between stimulus area and photon flux with stimuli constant for CFD, irradiance, or area at central (0 deg) and peripheral (20 deg) eccentricities with high and low melanopsin excitation was determined.
Journal ArticleDOI

The accuracy of artificial and natural light measurements by actigraphs

TL;DR: Both actigraphs provide good performance in monitoring the temporal patterning of light, whereas the absolute illuminance values require correction to accurately evaluate the effects of light intensity on human health and behaviours.