抗原变异可使得多种致病微生物易于逃避宿主免疫应答。表达在感染红细胞表面的恶性疟原虫红细胞表面蛋白1（PfPMP1）与感染红细胞、内皮细胞、树突状细胞以及胎盘的单个或多个受体作用，在黏附及免疫逃避中起关键的作用。每个单倍体基因组var基因家族编码约60种成员，通过启动转录不同的var基因变异体为抗原变异提供了分子基础。

疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]／Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

The manipulation of fluids in channels with dimensions of tens of micrometres--microfluidics--has emerged as a distinct new field. Microfluidics has the potential to influence subject areas from chemical synthesis and biological analysis to optics and information technology. But the field is still at an early stage of development. Even as the basic science and technological demonstrations develop, other problems must be addressed: choosing and focusing on initial applications, and developing strategies to complete the cycle of development, including commercialization. The solutions to these problems will require imagination and ingenuity.

The origins and the future of microfluidics

The 11th edition of Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine welcomes Anthony Fauci to its editorial staff, in addition to more than 85 new contributors. While the organization of the book is similar to previous editions, major emphasis has been placed on disorders that affect multiple organ systems. Important advances in genetics, immunology, and oncology are emphasized. Many chapters of the book have been rewritten and describe major advances in internal medicine. Subjects that received only a paragraph or two of attention in previous editions are now covered in entire chapters. Among the chapters that have been extensively revised are the chapters on infections in the compromised host, on skin rashes in infections, on many of the viral infections, including cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus, on sexually transmitted diseases, on diabetes mellitus, on disorders of bone and mineral metabolism, and on lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly. The major revisions in these chapters and many

Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine

Recent advances in mechanics and materials provide routes to integrated circuits that can offer the electrical properties of conventional, rigid wafer-based technologies but with the ability to be stretched, compressed, twisted, bent, and deformed into arbitrary shapes. Inorganic and organic electronic materials in microstructured and nanostructured forms, intimately integrated with elastomeric substrates, offer particularly attractive characteristics, with realistic pathways to sophisticated embodiments. Here, we review these strategies and describe applications of them in systems ranging from electronic eyeball cameras to deformable light-emitting displays. We conclude with some perspectives on routes to commercialization, new device opportunities, and remaining challenges for research.

http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/327/5973/1603.full.pdf

Materials and mechanics for stretchable electronics

基礎講座 電気泳動(Electrophoresis)

Herein we describe a versatile new strategy for producing monodisperse solid particles with sizes from 20 to 1000 mm. The method involves the formation of monodisperse liquid droplets by using a microfluidic device and shaping the droplets in a microchannel and then solidifying these drops in situ either by polymerizing a liquid monomer or by lowering the temperature of a liquid that sets thermally. This method has the following features: 1) It produces particles with an exceptionally narrow range of sizes. 2) A new level of control over the shapes of the particles is offered. 3) The mechanism for droplet formation allows the use of a wide variety of materials including gels, metals, polymers, and polymers doped with functional additives. 4) The procedure can be scaled up to produce large numbers of particles. A number of methods exist for making inorganic and organic particles with narrow polydispersity. Inorganic colloids are typically prepared by precipitation reactions from organometallic precursors. Polymer colloids with sizes from 20 nm to approximately 1 mm are usually prepared by a variation of emulsion polymerization techniques. Larger beads are accessible through miniemulsion polymerization,

https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ange.200590085

Generation of Monodisperse Particles by Using Microfluidics: Control over Size, Shape, and Composition

This Review summarizes methods for constructing systems and structures at micron or submicron scales that have applications in microbiology. These tools make it possible to manipulate individual cells and their immediate extracellular environments and have the capability to transform the study of microbial physiology and behaviour. Because of their simplicity, low cost and use in microfabrication, we focus on the application of soft lithographic techniques to the study of microorganisms, and describe several key areas in microbiology in which the development of new microfabricated materials and tools can have a crucial role.

/pdf/microfabrication-meets-microbiology-3fk5svoxk6.pdf

Microfabrication meets microbiology

1. Introduction: Overview of CA as a Model
Carbonic anhydrase (CA, EC 4.2.1.1) is a protein that is especially well-suited to serve as a model in many types of studies in biophysics, bioanalysis, the physical-organic chemistry of inhibitor design, and medicinal chemistry. In vivo, this enzyme catalyzes the hydration of CO2 and the dehydration of bicarbonate (eq 1).


CO2+H2O⇌HCO3−+H+

(1)


The active site of α-CAs comprises a catalytic ZnII ion coordinated by three imidazole groups of histidines and by one hydroxide ion (or water molecule), all in a distorted tetrahedral geometry. This grouping is located at the base of a cone-shaped amphiphilic depression, one wall of which is dominated by hydrophobic residues and the other of which is dominated by hydrophilic residues.1 Unless otherwise stated, “CA” in this review refers to (i) various isozymes of α-CAs or (ii) the specific α-CAs human carbonic anhydrases I and II (HCA I and HCA II) and bovine carbonic anhydrase II (BCA II); “HCA” refers to HCA I and HCA II; and “CA II” refers to HCA II and BCA II.

CA is particularly attractive for biophysical studies of protein–ligand binding for many reasons. (i) CA is a monomeric, single-chain protein of intermediate molecular weight (~30 kDa), and it has no pendant sugar or phosphate groups and no disulfide bonds. (ii) It is inexpensive and widely available. (iii) It is relatively easy to handle and purify, due in large part to its excellent stability under standard laboratory conditions. (iv) Amino acid sequences are available for most of its known isozymes. (v) The structure of CA, and of its active site, has been defined in detail by X-ray diffraction, and the mechanism of its catalytic activity is well-understood. (vi) As an enzyme, CA behaves not only as a hydratase/anhydrase with a high turnover number but also as an esterase (a reaction that is easy to follow experimentally). (vii) The mechanism of inhibition of CA by ligands that bind to the ZnII ion is fairly simple and well-characterized; it is, therefore, easy to screen inhibitors and to examine designed inhibitors that test theories of protein–ligand interactions. (viii) It is possible to prepare and study the metal-free apoenzyme and the numerous variants of CA in which the ZnII ion is replaced by other divalent ions. (ix) Charge ladders of CA II—sets of derivatives in which acylation of lysine amino groups (−NH3+ → −NHAc) changes the net charge of the protein—allow the influence of charge on properties to be examined by capillary electrophoresis. Some disadvantages of using CA include the following: (i) the presence of the ZnII cofactor, which can complicate biophysical and physical-organic analyses; (ii) a structure that is more stable than a representative globular protein and, thus, slightly suspect as a model system for certain studies of stability; (iii) a function—interconversion of carbon dioxide and carbonate—that does not involve the types of enzyme/substrate interactions that are most interesting in design of drugs; (iv) a catalytic reaction that is, in a sense, too simple (determining the mechanism of a reaction is, in practice, usually made easier if the reactants and products have an intermediate level of complexity); and (v) the absence of a solution structure of CA (by NMR spectroscopy). The ample X-ray data, however, paint an excellent picture of the changes (which are generally small) in the structure of CA that occur on binding ligands or introducing mutations.

The most important class of inhibitors of CA, the aryl-sulfonamides, has several characteristics that also make it particularly suitable for physical-organic studies of inhibitor binding and in drug design: (i) arylsulfonamides are easily synthesized; (ii) they bind with high affinity to CA (1 μM to sub-nM); (iii) they share one common structural feature; and (iv) they share a common, narrowly defined geometry of binding that exposes a part of the ligand that can be easily modified synthetically. There are also many non-sulfonamide, organic inhibitors of CA, as well as anionic, inorganic inhibitors.

We divide this review into five parts, all with the goal of using CA as a model system for biophysical studies: (I) an overview of the enzymatic activity and medical relevance of CA; (II) the structure and structure–function relationships of CA and its engineered mutants; (III) the thermodynamics and kinetics of the binding of ligands to CA; (IV) the effect of electrostatics on the binding of ligands to and the denaturation of CA; and (V) what makes CA a good model for studying protein–ligand binding and protein stability.



1.1. Value of Models 
CA serves as a good model system for the study of enzymes. That is, it is a protein having some characteristics representative of enzymes as a class, but with other characteristics that make it especially easy to study. It is a moderately important target in current medicinal chemistry: its inhibition is important in the treatment of glaucoma, altitude sickness, and obesity; its overexpression has recently been implicated in tumor growth; and its inhibition in pathogenic organisms might lead to further interesting drugs.2,3 More than its medical relevance, its tractability and simplicity are what make CA a particularly attractive model enzyme.

The importance of models in science is often underestimated. Models represent more complex classes of related systems and contribute to the study of those classes by focusing research on particular, tractable problems. The development of useful, widely accepted models is a critical function of scientific research: many of the techniques (both experimental and analytical) and concepts of science are developed in terms of models; they are thoroughly engrained in our system of research and analysis.

Examples of models abound in successful areas of science: in biology, E. coli, S. cerevisiae, Drosophila mela-nogaster, C. elegans, Brachydanio rerio (zebrafish), and the mouse; in chemistry, the hydrogen atom, octanol as a hydrophobic medium, benzene as an aromatic molecule, the 2-norbornyl carbocation as a nonclassical ion, substituted cyclohexanes for the study of steric effects, p-substituted benzoic acids for the study of electronic effects, cyclodextrins for ligand–receptor interactions; in physics, a vibrating string as an oscillator and a particle in a box as a model for electrons in orbitals.

Science needs models for many reasons:


Focus: Models allow a community of researchers to study a common subject. Solving any significant problem in science requires a substantial effort, with contributions from many individuals and techniques. Models are often the systems chosen to make this productive, cooperative focus possible.


Research Overhead: Development of a system to the point where many details are scientifically tractable is the product of a range of contributions: for enzymes, these contributions are protocols for preparations, development of assays, determination of structures, preparation of mutants, definition of substrate specificity, study of rates, and development of mechanistic models. In a well-developed model system, the accumulation of this information makes it relatively easy to carry out research, since before new experiments begin, much of the background work–the fundamental research in a new system–has already been carried out.


Recruiting and Interdisciplinarity: The availability of good model systems makes it relatively easy for a neophyte to enter an area of research and to test ideas efficiently. This ease of entry recruits new research groups, who use, augment, and improve the model system. It is especially important to have model systems to encourage participation by researchers in other disciplines, for whom even the elementary technical procedures in a new field may appear daunting.


Comparability: A well-established model allows researchers in different laboratories to calibrate their experiments, by reproducing well-characterized experiments.


Community: The most important end result of a good model system is often the generation of a scientific community–that is, a group of researchers examining a common problem from different perspectives and pooling information relevant to common objectives.



One of the goals of this review is to summarize many experimental and theoretical studies of CA that have established it as a model protein. We hope that this summary will make it easier for others to use this protein to study fundamentals of two of the most important questions in current chemistry: (i) Why do a protein and ligand associate selectively? (ii) How can one design an inhibitor to bind to a protein selectively and tightly? We believe that the summary of studies of folding and stability of CA will be useful to biophysicists who study protein folding. In addition, we hope that the compilation of data relevant to CA in one review will ease the search for information for those who are beginning to work with this protein.

/pdf/carbonic-anhydrase-as-a-model-for-biophysical-and-physical-1nijnawjpq.pdf

Carbonic Anhydrase as a Model for Biophysical and Physical-Organic Studies of Proteins and Protein–Ligand Binding

The interaction of bacteria with surfaces has important implications in a range of areas, including bioenergy, biofouling, biofilm formation, and the infection of plants and animals. Many of the interactions of bacteria with surfaces produce changes in the expression of genes that influence cell morphology and behavior, including genes essential for motility and surface attachment. Despite the attention that these phenotypes have garnered, the bacterial systems used for sensing and responding to surfaces are still not well understood. An understanding of these mechanisms will guide the development of new classes of materials that inhibit and promote cell growth, and complement studies of the physiology of bacteria in contact with surfaces. Recent studies from a range of fields in science and engineering are poised to guide future investigations in this area. This review summarizes recent studies on bacteria–surface interactions, discusses mechanisms of surface sensing and consequences of cell attachment, provides an overview of surfaces that have been used in bacterial studies, and highlights unanswered questions in this field.

/pdf/bacteria-surface-interactions-4brz0xn30o.pdf

Bacteria-surface interactions.

This article reviews the physical and chemical constraints of environments on biofilm formation. We provide a perspective on how materials science and engineering can address fundamental questions and unmet technological challenges in this area of microbiology, such as biofilm prevention. Specifically, we discuss three factors that impact the development and organization of bacterial communities. (1) Physical properties of surfaces regulate cell attachment and physiology and affect early stages of biofilm formation. (2) Chemical properties influence the adhesion of cells to surfaces and their development into biofilms and communities. (3) Chemical communication between cells attenuates growth and influences the organization of communities. Mechanisms of spatial and temporal confinement control the dimensions of communities and the diffusion path length for chemical communication between biofilms, which, in turn, influences biofilm phenotypes. Armed with a detailed understanding of biofilm formation, researchers are applying the tools and techniques of materials science and engineering to revolutionize the study and control of bacterial communities growing at interfaces.

/pdf/physicochemical-regulation-of-biofilm-formation-4e0pgah617.pdf

Douglas B. Weibel

Papers

Generation of Monodisperse Particles by Using Microfluidics: Control over Size, Shape, and Composition

Microfabrication meets microbiology

Carbonic Anhydrase as a Model for Biophysical and Physical-Organic Studies of Proteins and Protein–Ligand Binding

Bacteria-surface interactions.

Physicochemical regulation of biofilm formation