scispace - formally typeset
F

Farzana Ashraf

Researcher at COMSATS Institute of Information Technology

Publications -  50
Citations -  206

Farzana Ashraf is an academic researcher from COMSATS Institute of Information Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Biology. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 31 publications receiving 66 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

An international study on psychological coping during COVID-19: Towards a meaning-centered coping style

Nikolett Eisenbeck, +43 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the role of different psychological coping mechanisms in mental and physical health during the initial phases of the COVID-19 crisis with an emphasis on meaning-centered coping.
Journal ArticleDOI

Factorial validity of the Urdu version of the Obsession with COVID-19 Scale: Preliminary investigation using a university sample in Pakistan.

TL;DR: The results showed that the OCS exhibited factorial validity, as well as measurement invariance for gender, but showed limited evidence of construct validity in terms of showing weak positive correlations with the total scale and social dysfunction and self-confidence subscales of the General Heath Questionnaire and no correlation with the depression and anxiety subscale (GHQ-12).
Journal ArticleDOI

Work status, death anxiety and psychological distress during COVID-19 pandemic: Implications of the terror management theory.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors determined the application of terror management theory during the COVID-19 pandemic in Pakistan and examined death anxiety and psychological distress in the context of work status.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of Direct and Indirect Teacher Feedback on Accuracy of English Writing: A Quasi-Experimental Study among Pakistani Undergraduate Students

TL;DR: This article investigated the effect of teacher feedback on the written English accuracy of English as Second Language (ESL) students and found that ESL learners given direct meta-linguistic oral feedback reported fewer errors in two out of three linguistic forms in subsequent writing in comparison with ESL learners who received indirect written feedback and those who did not receive feedback.