Photodynamic therapy (PDT) was discovered more than 100 years ago, and has since become a well-studied therapy for cancer and various non-malignant diseases including infections. PDT uses photosensitizers (PSs, non-toxic dyes) that are activated by absorption of visible light to initially form the excited singlet state, followed by transition to the long-lived excited triplet state. This triplet state can undergo photochemical reactions in the presence of oxygen to form reactive oxygen species (including singlet oxygen) that can destroy cancer cells, pathogenic microbes and unwanted tissue. The dual-specificity of PDT relies on accumulation of the PS in diseased tissue and also on localized light delivery. Tetrapyrrole structures such as porphyrins, chlorins, bacteriochlorins and phthalocyanines with appropriate functionalization have been widely investigated in PDT, and several compounds have received clinical approval. Other molecular structures including the synthetic dyes classes as phenothiazinium, squaraine and BODIPY (boron-dipyrromethene), transition metal complexes, and natural products such as hypericin, riboflavin and curcumin have been investigated. Targeted PDT uses PSs conjugated to antibodies, peptides, proteins and other ligands with specific cellular receptors. Nanotechnology has made a significant contribution to PDT, giving rise to approaches such as nanoparticle delivery, fullerene-based PSs, titania photocatalysis, and the use of upconverting nanoparticles to increase light penetration into tissue. Future directions include photochemical internalization, genetically encoded protein PSs, theranostics, two-photon absorption PDT, and sonodynamic therapy using ultrasound.

/pdf/new-photosensitizers-for-photodynamic-therapy-5diko9hbsn.pdf

New photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy

Background and Objectives: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) appears to be endowed with several favorable features for the treatment of infections originated by microbial pathogens, including a broad spectrum of action, the efficient inactivation of antibiotic-resistant strains, the low mutagenic potential, and the lack of selection of photoresistant microbial cells. Therefore, intensive studies are being pursued in order to define the scope and field of application of this approach. Results: Optimal cytocidal activity against a large variety of bacterial, fungal, and protozoan pathogens has been found to be typical of photosensitizers that are positively charged at physiological pH values (e.g., for the presence of quaternarized amino groups or the association with polylysine moieties) and are characterized by a moderate hydrophobicity (n-octanol/water partition coefficient around 10). These photosensitizers in a micromolar concentration can induce a > 4–5 log decrease in the microbial population after incubation times as short as 5– 10 minutes and irradiation under mild experimental conditions, such as fluence-rates around 50 mW/cm 2 and irradiation times shorter than 15 minutes. Conclusions: PDT appears to represent an efficacious alternative modality for the treatment of localized microbial infections through the in situ application of the photosensitizer followed by irradiation of the photosensitizer-loaded infected area. Proposed clinical fields of interest of antimicrobial PDT include the treatment of chronic ulcers, infected burns, acne vulgaris, and a variety of oral infections. Lasers Surg. Med. 38:468–481, 2006. 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lsm.20361

Photodynamic therapy in the treatment of microbial infections: Basic principles and perspective applications

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) can attack a diverse range of targets to exert antimicrobial activity, which accounts for their versatility in mediating host defense against a broad range of pathogens. Most ROS are formed by the partial reduction in molecular oxygen. Four major ROS are recognized comprising superoxide (O2•-), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radical (•OH), and singlet oxygen ((1)O2), but they display very different kinetics and levels of activity. The effects of O2•- and H2O2 are less acute than those of •OH and (1)O2, because the former are much less reactive and can be detoxified by endogenous antioxidants (both enzymatic and nonenzymatic) that are induced by oxidative stress. In contrast, no enzyme can detoxify •OH or (1)O2, making them extremely toxic and acutely lethal. The present review will highlight the various methods of ROS formation and their mechanism of action. Antioxidant defenses against ROS in microbial cells and the use of ROS by antimicrobial host defense systems are covered. Antimicrobial approaches primarily utilizing ROS comprise both bactericidal antibiotics and nonpharmacological methods such as photodynamic therapy, titanium dioxide photocatalysis, cold plasma, and medicinal honey. A brief final section covers reactive nitrogen species and related therapeutics, such as acidified nitrite and nitric oxide-releasing nanoparticles.

Antimicrobial strategies centered around reactive oxygen species - bactericidal antibiotics, photodynamic therapy and beyond

Photodynamic therapy for localized infections--state of the art.

Fullerenes have attracted considerable attention in different fields of science since their discovery in 1985. Investigations of physical, chemical and biological properties of fullerenes have yielded promising information. It is inferred that size, hydrophobicity, three-dimensionality and electronic configurations make them an appealing subject in medicinal chemistry. Their unique carbon cage structure coupled with immense scope for derivatization make them a potential therapeutic agent. The study of biological applications has attracted increasing attention despite the low solubility of carbon spheres in physiological media. The fullerene family, and especially C60, has appealing photo, electrochemical and physical properties, which can be exploited in various medical fields. Fullerene is able to fit inside the hydrophobic cavity of HIV proteases, inhibiting the access of substrates to the catalytic site of enzyme. It can be used as radical scavenger and antioxidant. At the same time, if exposed to light, fullerene can produce singlet oxygen in high quantum yields. This action, together with direct electron transfer from excited state of fullerene and DNA bases, can be used to cleave DNA. In addition, fullerenes have been used as a carrier for gene and drug delivery systems. Also they are used for serum protein profiling as MELDI material for biomarker discovery. In this review we report the aspects of medicinal applications of fullerenes.

Medicinal applications of fullerenes.

https://www.cell.com/cell-chemical-biology/pdf/S1074-5521(05)00270-X.pdf

Cationic Fullerenes Are Effective and Selective Antimicrobial Photosensitizers

Functionalized fullerenes mediate photodynamic killing of cancer cells: Type I versus Type II photochemical mechanism.

Carbon monoxide (CO) is a key material in C1 chemistry for chemical production and CO2 reduction, whereas in applications, such as H2 for fuel cells, its concentration must be kept below 0.2 ppm. Adsorption technology is useful for both CO removal and production to provide environmental sustainability for the energy and chemical industries. In this review, the CO adsorption performances of various adsorbents, such as activated carbons, zeolites, metal–organic frameworks, activated alumina, mesoporous silicas, and their modified adsorbents, are collected, and their physical and chemical properties and CO selectivities are summarized. Cu+ impregnation is a powerful and widely used modification method to enhance the CO adsorption of adsorbents. Therefore, the preparation methods and their effects on CO adsorption are also compared and reviewed. The data and analysis in this review can provide insights for the development of novel adsorbents and processes for CO removal and production. 

Haeryeon Lee

Papers

Cationic Fullerenes Are Effective and Selective Antimicrobial Photosensitizers

Functionalized fullerenes mediate photodynamic killing of cancer cells: Type I versus Type II photochemical mechanism.

Overview of Carbon Monoxide Adsorption Performance of Pristine and Modified Adsorbents