https://faculty.washington.edu/renatab/courses/PSE490/downloads/pretreatment.pdf

Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass.

Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition.

Various agricultural residues, such as corn fiber, corn stover, wheat straw, rice straw, and sugarcane bagasse, contain about 20–40% hemicellulose, the second most abundant polysaccharide in nature. The conversion of hemicellulose to fuels and chemicals is problematic. In this paper, various pretreatment options as well as enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass to fermentable sugars is reviewed. Our research dealing with the pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of corn fiber and development of novel and improved enzymes such as endo-xylanase, β-xylosidase, and α-l-arabinofuranosidase for hemicellulose bioconversion is described. The barriers, progress, and prospects of developing an environmentally benign bioprocess for large-scale conversion of hemicellulose to fuel ethanol, xylitol, 2,3-butanediol, and other value-added fermentation products are highlighted.

Hemicellulose bioconversion

An overview of the different inhibitors formed by pre-treatment of lignocellulosic materials and their inhibition of ethanol production in yeast and bacteria is given. Different high temperature physical pre-treatment methods are available to render the carbohydrates in lignocellulose accessible for ethanol fermentation. The resulting hydrolyzsates contain substances inhibitory to fermentation—depending on both the raw material (biomass) and the pre-treatment applied. An overview of the inhibitory effect on ethanol production by yeast and bacteria is presented. Apart from furans formed by sugar degradation, phenol monomers from lignin degradation are important co-factors in hydrolysate inhibition, and inhibitory effects of these aromatic compounds on different ethanol producing microorganisms is reviewed. The furans and phenols generally inhibited growth and ethanol production rate (QEtOH) but not the ethanol yields (YEtOH) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Within the same phenol functional group (aldehyde, ketone, and acid) the inhibition of volumetric ethanol productivity was found to depend on the amount of methoxyl substituents and hence hydrophobicity (log P). Many pentose-utilizing strains Escherichia coli, Pichia stipititis, and Zymomonas mobilis produce ethanol in concentrated hemicellulose liquors but detoxification by overliming is needed. Thermoanaerobacter mathranii A3M3 can grow on pentoses and produce ethanol in hydrolysate without any need for detoxification.

Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass.

Hemicelluloses for fuel ethanol: A review.

Effects of lignocellulose degradation products on ethanol fermentations of glucose and xylose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Zymomonas mobilis, Pichia stipitis, and Candida shehatae

The ability ofCandida guillermondii to produce xylitol from xylose and to ferment individual non xylose hemicellulosic derived sugars was investigated in microaerobic conditions. Xylose was converted into xylitol with a yield of 0,63 g/g and ethanol was produced in negligible amounts. The strain did not convert glucose, mannose and galactose into their corresponding polyols but only into ethanol and cell mass. By contrast, fermentation of arabinose lead to the formation of arabitol. On D-xylose medium,Candida guillermondii exhibited high yield and rate of xylitol production when the initial sugar concentration exceeded 110 g/l. A final xylitol concentration of 221 g/l was obtained from 300 g/l D-xylose with a yield of 82,6% of theoretical and an average specific rate of 0,19 g/g.h.

Xylitol production from D-xylose byCandida guillermondii: Fermentation behaviour

The kinetics and enzymology ofd-xylose utilization are studied in micro-, semi-, and aerobic batch cultures during growth ofCandida guilliermondii andCandida parapsilosis in the presence of several initial xylose concentrations. The abilities of xylitol accumulation by these two yeast strains are high and similar, although observed under various growth conditions. WithCandida parapsilosis, optimal xylitol production yield (0.74 g/g) was obtained in microaerobiosis with 100 g/L of xylose, whereas optimal conditions to produce xylitol byCandida guilliermondii (0.69 g/g) arose from aerobiosis with 300 g/L of sugar. The different behavior of these yeasts is most probably explained by differences in the nature of the initial step of xylose metabolism: a NADPH-linked xylose reductase activity is measured with a weaker NADH-linked activity. These activities seem to be dependent on the degree of aerobiosis and on the initial xylose concentration and correlate with xylitol accumulation.

Xylitol production from xylose by two yeast strains: Sugar tolerance

Production of alcohol from raw wheat flour by Amyloglucosidase and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The fermentation of D-xylose byPachysolen tannophilus Y2460,Pichia stipitis Y7124,Kluyveromyces marxianus Y2415 andCandida shehatae Y12878 was investigated in aerobic, anaerobic and microaerophilic batch cultures. The aeration rate greatly influenced the fermentations; growth, rate of ethanol production and oxidation of ethanol are affected. Of the strains tested,Pichia stipitis appears superior; under anaerobic conditions it converts D-xylose (20 g/l) to ethanol with a yield of 0.40 g/l and it exhibits the highest ethanol specific productivity (3.5 g of ethanol per g dry cell per day) under microaerophilic conditions.

J. M. Navarro

Papers

Effects of lignocellulose degradation products on ethanol fermentations of glucose and xylose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Zymomonas mobilis, Pichia stipitis, and Candida shehatae

Xylitol production from D-xylose byCandida guillermondii: Fermentation behaviour

Xylitol production from xylose by two yeast strains: Sugar tolerance

Production of alcohol from raw wheat flour by Amyloglucosidase and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The effect of aeration on D-xylose fermentation by Pachysolen tannophilus, Pichia stipitis, Kluyveromyces marxianus, and Candida shehatae.