scispace - formally typeset
J

Jeremy Millar

Researcher at Monash University

Publications -  201
Citations -  6907

Jeremy Millar is an academic researcher from Monash University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Prostate cancer & Population. The author has an hindex of 31, co-authored 169 publications receiving 6074 citations. Previous affiliations of Jeremy Millar include Alfred Hospital & Wellington Hospital.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus: a randomised controlled phase III trial.

TL;DR: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin and fluorouracil does not significantly improve progression-free or overall survival for patients with resectable oesophageal cancer compared with surgery alone, and further assessment is warranted of the role of cheMoradiotherapy in patients with squamous-cell tumours.
Journal ArticleDOI

Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial

TL;DR: The first analyses of effectiveness from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial are presented, finding Escalated-dose CFRT with neoadjuvant androgen suppression seems clinically worthwhile in terms of bPFS, progression-free survival, and decreased use of salvage androgens suppression.
Journal ArticleDOI

Activation of Thymic Regeneration in Mice and Humans following Androgen Blockade

TL;DR: It is demonstrated that androgen ablation results in the complete regeneration of the aged male mouse thymus, restoration of peripheral T cell phenotype and function and enhancedThymus regeneration following bone marrow transplantation.
Journal Article

AN UPDATE OF THE PHASE III TRIAL COMPARING WHOLE PELVIC TO PROSTATE ONLY RADIOTHERAPY AND NEOADJUVANT TO ADJUVANT TOTAL ANDROGEN SUPPRESSION : UPDATED ANALYSIS OF RTOG 94-13, WITH EMPHASIS ON UNEXPECTED HORMONE/ RADIATION INTERACTIONS: IN REGARD TO LAWTON ET AL. Author's reply

TL;DR: Unexpected interactions appear to exist between the timing of hormonal therapy and radiation field size for this patient population and additional studies are warranted to determine whether the failure to demonstrate an advantage for NHT + WPRT compared with PORT + AHT is chance or, more likely, reflects a previously unrecognized biologic phenomenon.